However, it was held by the Supreme Court that an affidavit can be used as an evidence only if the Court so orders for sufficient reasons.

However, retired Associate Justices ( unlike judges on senior status ) take no part in the consideration or decision of any cases before the Supreme Court, although they may be appointed by the Chief Justice to sit on lower courts.

From such a surrender, the dissolution of the body corporate ensues .” Nor does there seem to have been much question that by “ a judgment of forfeiture against a corporation itself, it may be dissolved .” However, Supreme Court Justice Wilson, lecturing in his unofficial capacity, at least, suggests his displeasure with the doctrine that corporate dissolution cannot be predicated “ by a judgment of ouster against individuals.

However, of late, the Supreme Court has observed that the PIL has tended to become a means to gain publicity or obtain relief contrary to constitutionally valid legislation and policy.

However, in the case of Griggs v. Duke Power Co. in 1971, for the purpose of minimizing employment practices that disparately impacted racial minorities, the U. S. Supreme Court banned the use of IQ tests in employment, except when linked to job performance via a Job analysis.

However, there is a body of case law governing the civil commitment of individuals under the Fourteenth Amendment through U. S. Supreme Court rulings beginning with Addington v. Texas in 1979 which set the bar for involuntary commitment for treatment by raising the burden of proof required to commit persons from the usual civil burden of proof of " preponderance of the evidence " to the higher standard of " clear and convincing " evidence.

However, in a special class of cases, the U. S. Supreme Court has the power to exercise original jurisdiction.

However, the Supreme Court significantly altered the voluntariness standard in the case of Colorado v. Connelly.

However, on January 20, 2006, the Turkish Supreme Court ruled that his time served in Italy could not be deducted from his Turkish sentence and he was returned to jail.

However, the privilege was not formally recognized by the U. S. Supreme Court until United States v. Reynolds ( 1953 ) where it was held to be a common law evidentiary privilege.

However, the Supreme Court recognized an important exception in Padilla v. Kentucky ( 2010 ), in which the Court held that defense counsel is obligated to inform defendants of the potential immigration consequences of a guilty plea.

However, he / she may refer it to the Supreme Court to test its constitutionality.

However, the United States Supreme Court found that the defendants ( World-Wide Volkswagen Corp .) did not have the minimum contacts with Oklahoma necessary to create personal jurisdiction there.

However, appeal is merely a privilege provided by statute in 47 states and in federal judicial proceedings ; the U. S. Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that there is no federal constitutional right to an appeal.

However, the Supreme Court has ruled that Congress does have latitude to delegate regulatory powers to executive agencies as long as it provides an " intelligible principle " which governs the agency's exercise of the delegated regulatory authority.

However, the Supreme Court has interpreted the provision of Clause One that Representatives shall be elected " by the People " to mean that, in those states with more than one member of the House of Representatives, each congressional election district within the state must have nearly identical populations.

However, the United States Supreme Court has ruled that certain ballot access requirements, such as filing fees and submitting a certain number of valid petition signatures do not constitute additional qualifications and thus few Constitutional restrictions exist as to how harsh ballot access laws can be.

However, Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes wrote, " the Constitution does not appear to authorize two or more Supreme Courts functioning in effect as separate courts.

However, starting with Gitlow v. New York, the Supreme Court has applied the First Amendment to each state.

However, it was not until the middle to late twentieth century that the Supreme Court began to interpret the Establishment and Free Exercise Clauses in such a manner as to restrict the promotion of religion by the states.

Justice Abe Fortas wrote, However, since 1969 the Supreme Court has placed a number of limitations on Tinker interpretations.

However, the Supreme Court has ruled that the problem of scarcity does not allow the raising of a First Amendment issue.

However, in Mapp v. Ohio,, the Supreme Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment applies to the states by way of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

However, in City of Indianapolis v. Edmond,, the Supreme Court ruled that discretionary checkpoints or general crime-fighting checkpoints are not allowed.

However, in Crawford v. Washington,, the Supreme Court increased the scope of the Confrontation Clause by ruling that " testimonial " out-of-court statements are inadmissible if the accused did not have the opportunity to cross-examine that accuser and that accuser is unavailable at trial.

However, the General Court at Boston ordered the purchasers of Shawomet to appear before them to answer the sachems' claim.

However, this Court put to one side without consideration the Government's appeal from the dismissal of its Sherman Act allegations.

However, the Attorney General of California, at the request of the Secretary of Labor, sought to have the jurisdiction over the issue removed to the Federal District Court, on grounds that it was predominantly a Federal issue since the validity of the Secretary's Regulation was being challenged.

However, the Federal Court held that since the State had accepted the provisions of the Wagner-Peyser Act into its own Code, and presumably therefore also the regulations, it was now a State matter.

However, Twomey expresses confidence that, if the High Court of Australia were to be faced with the problems of covering clause 2, it would find some way to conclude that, with regard to Australia, the clause is subject solely to Australian law.

However, in February 2006 the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany struck down these provisions of the law, stating such preventive measures were unconstitutional and would essentially be state-sponsored murder, even if such an act would save many more lives on the ground.

However, by 1906, the English Court of Appeal had made it clear in the decision of Automatic Self-Cleansing Filter Syndicate Co v Cunningham 2 Ch 34 that the division of powers between the board and the shareholders in general meaning depended on the construction of the articles of association and that, where the powers of management were vested in the board, the general meeting could not interfere with their lawful exercise.

However, by the terms of the Tennis Court Oath, the communes had bound themselves to meet continuously until France had a constitution.

However, the election may be overruled by the Magistrates ' Court if the facts suggest that the sentencing powers of a Magistrates ' Court would be inadequate to reflect the seriousness of the offence.

However, the Court did create a set of guidelines that must be followed.

However, although this is not conducting a plea bargain, in cases before the Crown Court, the defence can request an indication from the judge of the likely maximum sentence that would be imposed should the defendant decide to plead guilty.

) However, the European Court of Justice ruled against the law, potentially paving the way for a takeover.

" However, the Court overturned the spending limits, which it found imposed " substantial restraints on the quantity of political speech.

However, it is also possible that this position has not yet been completely overturned, since it was re-asserted in December 2009 by Pope Benedict XVI in Rome, who accused the mass media of producing " poison " that makes people less sensitive to violence.

However, this was merely a compromise position, and one which was in opposition to normal masonic practice, and consequently on 10 November 2004 ( after much deliberation by a special working party ) the Grand Chapter ( at its regular meeting in London ) overturned this compromise position, and declared the Royal Arch to be a separate degree in its own right, albeit the natural progression from the third degree.

However, their convictions were overturned on appeal in 1915 on the grounds that important defense evidence should have been admitted.

However, on 25 August 2005, the BRAC Commission overturned the recommendation that Cannon AFB be closed, but upheld the withdrawal of the base's F-16 fighter aircraft.

However, on December 10, 1941, the conviction was overturned on a 4 – 3 vote by New York's Court of Appeals, which questioned the use of testimony of non-accomplice witnesses who were promised leniency to support the testimony of Reles, Tannenbaum and Magoon.

However, in Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. Dimension Films, such a ruling was overturned on appeal, the US appeals court explicitly declining to recognize a de minimis standard for digital sampling.

However, the events of April to June 1940 overturned the balance of power, as the Germans conquered Denmark, Norway, The Netherlands, Belgium and France.

However the government successfully appealed to the Appellate Committee of the House of Lords who overturned the High Court and Court of Appeal decisions.

However an appeal to the Privy Council in London led to the decision being overturned.

However, it overturned the decision of the district court regarding the newspapers.

However in urban areas, the extinguishing of fires ignited by thermal radiation may matter little, as fires may also be started in a surprise attack by blast effect induced electrical shorts, gas pilot lights, overturned stoves, and other ignition sources, as was the case in the breakfast-time bombing of Hiroshima.

However, the Romans demanded the complete surrender of the city, and surprisingly to the Romans the city refused, the faction advocating submission overturned by one in favor of defense.

However, these scholars caution that a rise in ethnic consciousness did not have an impact on the official imperial ideology. In the official ideology, the traditional Byzantine view of Byzantium as the successor of Rome was not overturned, as the usage of the word Rhomaioi for subjects of the Nicene emperors demonstrates.

However, when the AFL overturned the draw result the following Wednesday after the match due to an error by the siren, the first time this had occurred since 1900, the AFL Commission declared Fremantle as one-point winners.

However, on 8 July an appeals court overturned Mijailović's sentence after tests had concluded that he was suffering from a mental illness at the time of the killing.

However, on 8 July, an appeals court overturned that sentence after tests had concluded that he was suffering from a mental illness at the time of the killing.

However, when the mayor restricted the vote to only Freemen in the election of 1660 for the Convention Parliament that organised the restoration of the monarchy, the House of Commons noted that " for One-and-twenty Parliaments, the Commonalty, as well as the Citizens, had had Voice in the electing of Members to serve in Parliament ; and that thereupon the Committee were of Opinion, that the Commonalty of the said Borough, together with the free Citizens, have Right of Election " and overturned the election, seating instead the candidate elected by the more-inclusive Commonality of Chichester, and jailing the mayor for two weeks for contempt because of his wilful denial of the ancient rights.

However this achievement was overturned later by the Supreme Court in Wabash v. Illinois.

However, Judge Motley's ruling was overturned on appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

However, an adverse report can be overturned.

However, in 1855, the Ohio State Supreme Court overturned the lower court rulings and upheld the constitutionality of a state wide prohibitory liquor law.

However, the Court of Appeal overturned her conviction within weeks: the disqualification was revoked, and she resumed her place in the House of Commons.

However, these findings of liability were overturned on appeal by the Northwest Territories Court of Appeal and a decision by the Supreme Court of Canada is pending.