In 1929 Leavis married one of his students, Queenie Roth, and this union resulted in a productive collaboration which yielded many great critical works culminating with their annus mirabilis in 1932 when Leavis published New Bearings in English Poetry, his wife published Fiction and the Reading Public, and the quarterly periodical Scrutiny was founded ( Greenwood 9 ).

In 1933 Leavis published For Continuity, which was a selection of Scrutiny essays.

Its undoubted influence as a precursor of later criticism was very marked in the early days of Scrutiny, the magazine founded a few years later by F. R. Leavis and Q. D. Leavis.

In 1932 and 1933 he was involved in a debate with F. R. Leavis, in the pages of Scrutiny.

He at times attributed his lack of success in finding a post closer to home to writing for Scrutiny and his short association with F. R. Leavis ; whose influence he mainly and early, but not entirely, rejected.

Leavis ' proponents claimed that he introduced a " seriousness " into English studies, and some English and American university departments were shaped very much by Leavis ’ s example and ideas.

Though his achievements as a critic of fiction were impressive, Leavis is often viewed as having been a better critic of poetry than of the novel.

F. R. Leavis wrote in 1936: " Carew, it seems to me, has claims to more distinction than he is commonly accorded ; more than he is accorded by the bracket that, in common acceptance, links him with Lovelace and Suckling.

In 1927, Leavis was appointed as a probationary lecturer for the university, and, when his first substantial publications began to appear a few years later, their style was very much influenced by the demands of teaching.

A small publishing house, The Minority Press, was founded by Gordon Fraser, another of Leavis ' students, in 1930, and served for several years as an additional outlet for the work of Leavis and some of his students.

Leavis vigorously attacked Snow's suggestion, from a 1959 lecture and book by C. P. Snow ( see The Two Cultures ), that practitioners of the scientific and humanistic disciplines should have some significant understanding of each other, and that a lack of knowledge of twentieth-century physics was comparable to an ignorance of Shakespeare ( Bell 10 ).

* The Great Tradition by F. R. Leavis ( London: Chatto and Windus 1948 )

F. R. Leavis admired and was influenced by Murry's early criticism.

An anonymous New Statesman review ( 29 Dec. 1928 ) of Eliot's criticism, however, to which F. R. Leavis replied apparently believing it was by Lucas, and which Leavis's biographer says " was certainly by Lucas ", was in fact by R. Ellis Roberts.

" ( John Britton has pointed out that this was never a question actually posed by Bradley, and apparently was made up by F. R. Leavis as a mockery of " current irrelevancies in Shakespeare criticism.

He was educated at Winchester College and Magdalene College, Cambridge, where he read English and was taught by F. R. Leavis.

He read English at Downing College, Cambridge, where he was taught and heavily influenced by F. R. Leavis.

Leavis and others ), and its completion was swiftly followed by his departure from England.

Part I terminates with " Envoi ", i. e. " Farewell ", a poem printed in italics in which Pound in fact " resuscitates the dead art of poetry " ( as he had said in Poem I ) by addressing a singer in " canorous lyric measures " ( Leavis ).

* July 14 – F. R. Leavis, British literary critic ( d. 1978 )

* April 14 – F. R. Leavis, British literary critic ( b. 1895 )

* April 14 – F. R. Leavis, literary critic

* July 14-F. R. Leavis, British literary critic ( died 1978 )

The literary critic F. R. Leavis was critical of this work, calling Snow a " public relations man " for the scientific establishment in an essay published in The Spectator, which was widely decried in the British press.

Frank Raymond " F. R ." Leavis CH ( 14 July 1895 – 14 April 1978 ) was an influential British literary critic of the early-to-mid-twentieth century.

Frank Raymond Leavis was born in Cambridge, England, in 1895, about a decade after T. S. Eliot, James Joyce, D. H. Lawrence and Ezra Pound, literary figures whose reputations he would later contribute to enhancing.

Leavis ' uncompromising zeal in promoting his views of literature drew mockery from some literary quarters.

Leavis appeared to possess a very clear idea of literary criticism and he was well known for his decisive and often provocative, and idiosyncratic, judgements.

Following this period Leavis pursued an increasingly complex treatment of literary, educational and social issues.

In discussing the nature of language and value, Leavis implicitly treats the sceptical questioning that philosophical reflection starts from as an irrelevance from his standpoint as a literary critic-a position set out in his famous early exchange with Rene Wellek.

* F. R. Leavis ( 1895 – 1978 ), literary critic

* F. R. Leavis, literary critic

Queenie Dorothy Leavis ( 7 December 1906 – 17 March 1981 ), née Roth, was an English literary critic and essayist.

* F. R. Leavis, Famous for his practical criticism, compared to New Critics

New Bearings in English Poetry was the first major volume of criticism Leavis was to publish, and it provides insight into his own critical positions.

Although there are undoubtedly similarities between Leavis's approach to criticism and that of the New Critics ( most particularly in that both take the work of art itself as the primary focus of critical discussion ), Leavis is ultimately distinguishable from them, since he never adopted ( and was explicitly hostile to ) a theory of the poem as a self-contained and self-sufficient aesthetic and formal artefact, isolated from the society, culture and tradition from which it emerged.

Leavis insisted that valuation was the principal concern of criticism, and that it must ensure that English literature should be a living reality operating as an informing spirit in society, and that criticism should involve the shaping of contemporary sensibility ( Bilan 61 ).

The influence of T. S. Eliot is easily identifiable in his criticism of Victorian poetry, and Leavis acknowledged this, saying in The Common Pursuit that, ‘ It was Mr. Eliot who made us fully conscious of the weakness of that tradition ’ ( Leavis 31 ).

* Leavis, F R The Great Tradition, London, Chatto & Windus, 1948.

F. R. Leavis had rubbished Scott, seeing him as a thoroughly bad novelist and a thoroughly bad influence ( The Great Tradition ); Marilyn Butler, however, offered a political reading of the fiction of the period that found a great deal of genuine interest in his work ( Romantics, Revolutionaries, and Reactionaries ).

* Leavis, L. R. " Marriage, Murder, and Morality: The Secret Agent and Tess.

Leo Tolstoy and Fyodor Dostoyevsky soon became internationally renowned to the point that many scholars such as F. R. Leavis have described one or the other as the greatest novelist ever.

* F. R. Leavis