1913 photo of Paterson silk strike of 1913 | Paterson silk strike leaders Patrick Quinlan ( activist ) | Patrick Quinlan, Tresca, Elizabeth Gurley Flynn, Adolph Lessig, and Bill HaywoodTresca joined the revolutionary syndicalist Industrial Workers of the World ( IWW ) in 1912, when he was invited by the union to Lawrence, Massachusetts to help mobilize the Italian workers during a campaign to free strike leaders Joseph Ettor and Arturo Giovannitti, jailed on false murder charges.

For Lessig, privacy breaches online can be regulated through code and law.

In 1998 faculty member Lawrence Lessig, now at Stanford Law School, was asked by online publisher Eldritch Press to mount a legal challenge to US copyright law.

Harvard law professor and Creative Commons board member Lawrence Lessig had called for a constitutional convention in a September 24 – 25, 2011 conference co-chaired by the Tea Party Patriots ' national coordinator, in Lessig's October 5 book, Republic, Lost: How Money Corrupts Congress – and a Plan to Stop It, and at the Occupy protest in Washington, DC.

The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World ( 2001 ) is a book by Lawrence Lessig, at the time of writing a professor of law at Stanford Law School, who is well known as a critic of the extension of the copyright term in US.

Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity ( published in paperback as Free Culture: The Nature and Future of Creativity ) is a 2004 book by law professor Lawrence Lessig that was released on the Internet under the Creative Commons Attribution / Non-commercial license ( by-nc 1. 0 ) on March 25, 2004.

The law professor Lawrence Lessig

In the preface of Free Culture, Lessig compares this book with a previous book of his, Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace, which propounded that software has the effect of law.

Professor Lessig analyzes the tension that exists between the concepts of piracy and property in the intellectual property realm in the context of what he calls the present " depressingly compromised process of making law " that has been captured in most nations by multinational corporations that are interested in the accumulation of capital and not the free exchange of ideas.

First defining and then pointedly critiquing a prevalent " if value, then right " notion of creative property, Lessig emphasizes that American law recognizes intellectual property as an instrument.

Lessig says it best ‘ it is the special duty of policy makers to guarantee that that protection not become a deterrent to progress ’ He specifies that his argument is not about justification of protection of copyrights but the effects of changing the law regarding copyright in the face of the Internet.

Before the internet, copies of any work were the trigger for copyright law, but Lessig raises the point of whether copies should always be the trigger, especially when considering the way digital media sharing works.

According to Lessig, the public domain becomes orphaned by these changes to copyright law.

Lessig insists that the future of our society is being threatened by recent changes in US law and administration, including decisions by the US Federal Communications Commission that allow increased Concentration of media ownership.

Lessig emphasizes the role of copyright law, pointing out that as it stands, copyright law impacts all kinds of piracy, and hence is a part of the piracy war that challenges free culture.

Ultimately, Lessig calls for changes in US copyright law that balance the support of intellectual property with cultural freedom.

Liberate the Music -- Again-Here Lessig argues that the law on file-sharing music should be reformed and that any reform that attempts to limit file sharing in lieu of purchasing must also ensure it does not hamper the sharing of free content.

In recent years, Sunstein has been a guest writer on The Volokh Conspiracy blog as well as the blogs of law professors Lawrence Lessig ( Harvard ) and Jack Balkin ( Yale ).

The Center for Internet and Society ( CIS ) is a public interest technology law and policy program founded in 2000 by Lawrence Lessig at Stanford Law School and a part of Law, Science and Technology Program at Stanford Law School.

Lawrence Lessig claims copyright is an obstacle to cultural production, knowledge sharing and technological innovation, and that private interests – as opposed to public good – determine law.

Many of the ideas and mechanisms are related to changes in copyright law, as described by Lawrence Lessig and Creative Commons.

In February 2008, he started the DRAFT LESSIG movement to encourage law professor Lawrence Lessig to run for the United States Congress.

One of the students who had claimed that he was victimized was constitutional scholar Lawrence Lessig, who has represented another student, John Hardwicke, in his lawsuit against the school.

If the court felt that it had the power to review legislation under the Commerce clause, Lessig argued, then the Copyright clause deserved similar treatment, or at very least a " principled reason " must be stated for according such treatment to only one of the enumerated powers.

Lessig started his academic career at the University of Chicago Law School, where he was Professor from 1991 to 1997.

Lessig has emphasized in interviews that his philosophy experience at Cambridge radically changed his values and career path.

Charles Nesson, Lawrence Lessig, Jonathan Zittrain, John Palfrey, William W. Fisher, and Yochai Benkler hold appointments at the Center.

Lessig writes at the end of the Preface, “… the free culture that I defend in this book is a balance between anarchy and control.

Lessig claims this kind of environment is not democratic and at no point in our history have we had fewer " legal right to control more of the development of our culture than now.

Lessig cites drug company lobbying in the U. S. to prevent reduced prices for their drugs in Africa but he holds the government and society responsible for failing to " revolt " against this injustice. In 1997 the US government threatened South Africa with possible trade sanctions if it attempted to obtain the drugs at the price at which they were available in these few other poor countries.

* Lessig Speaks at Swarthmore-Professor Lessig's lecture at Swarthmore College

" Neutralita ' Delle Reti, Free Software E Societa ' Dell ' informazione " Senator Vimercati in an interview said that he wants " to do something for the network neutrality " and that he was inspired by Lawrence Lessig, Professor at the Stanford Law School.

The article made many people interested in the legal implications of online activity, including Lawrence Lessig, and Dibbell himself would go on to teach cyberlaw as a Fellow at Stanford Law School Center for the Internet and Society.

Lessig returned to Harvard in December 2008 as Professor and Director of the " Edmond J. Safra Foundation Center for Ethics ".

Cooper spoke with Harvard Law School professor Lawrence Lessig about the subject of reforming Congress.

Harvard Law School professor Lawrence Lessig has called for a constitutional convention to draft a Second Constitution of the United States.

While copyright helps artists get rewarded for their work, Lessig warns that a copyright regime that is too strict and grants copyright for too long a period of time ( e. g. the current US legal climate ) can destroy innovation, as the future always builds on the past.

Recently Lawrence Lessig has argued in his book Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace that computer code may regulate conduct in much the same way that legal codes do.

In his book Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace, Lawrence Lessig argues that computer code can regulate conduct in much the same way as the legal code.

Lessig traces the simultaneous legal environment that permitted its genious: Given the challenge of deciding whether photographers would need to get per mission before taking aim, the legal system decided " in favor of the pirates .....

Lessig presses to suggest that, had the legal atmosphere been different, " nothing like the growth in a democratic technology of expression would have been realized.

Lawrence Lessig, himself a board member of Free Software Foundation advocates free software and argues that computer code can regulate conduct in much the same way that legal codes do.