[permalink] [id link]
Let us define ( a polynomial of degree n ) and ( a nonzero polynomial of degree strictly less than n ) by, respectively the real and imaginary parts of f on the imaginary line.
from
Wikipedia
Some Related Sentences
Let and us
Let us look in on one of these nerve centers -- SAC at Omaha -- and see what must still happen before a wing of B-52 bombers could drop their Aj.
Let us not confuse the issue by labeling the objective or the method `` psychoanalytic '', for this is a well established term of art for the specific ideas and procedures initiated by Sigmund Freud and his followers for the study and treatment of disordered personalities.
Let us quote once more from R. G. Collingwood: `` History is properly concerned with the actions of human beings Regarded from the outside, an action is an event or series of events occurring in the physical world ; ;
Let us survey for a moment the development of modern thought -- turning our attention from the Reformation toward the revolutionary and romantic movements that follow and dwelling finally on more recent decades.
Let us, like the French, have outdoor cafes where we may relax, converse at leisure and enjoy the passing crowd.
Let us assume that it would be possible for an enemy to create an aerosol of the causative agent of epidemic typhus ( Rickettsia prowazwki ) over City A and that a large number of cases of typhus fever resulted therefrom.
Let us now put some flesh on the theoretical bones we have assembled by giving illustrations of roleplaying used for evaluation and analysis.
Let us also assume the existence of only one class or type of service, all of which is supplied at the same voltage, phase, etc. to residential, commercial, and industrial customers.
Let us therefore consider each of the three types of cost in turn, recognizing that this simplified classification is used only for illustrative purposes ; ;
Let us take a set of circumstances in which I happen to be interested on the legislative side and in which I think every one of us might naturally make such a statement.
Let and define
* Let be the set of ordered pairs of integers with not zero, and define an equivalence relation on according to which if and only if.
Let us imagine that the magnetization of a single superparamagnetic nanoparticle is measured and let us define as the measurement time.
Let x = x ( u, v, w ), y = y ( u, v, w ), z = z ( u, v, w ) be defined and smooth in a domain containing, and let these equations define the mapping of into.
Let B be a complex Banach algebra containing a unit e. Then we define the spectrum σ ( x ) ( or more explicitly σ < sub > B </ sub >( x )) of an element x of B to be the set of those complex numbers λ for which λe − x is not invertible in B.
Let X be locally ringed space with structure sheaf O < sub > X </ sub >; we want to define the tangent space T < sub > x </ sub > at the point x ∈ X.
Let M be a differentiable manifold and p a point of M. An affine connection on M allows one to define the notion of a geodesic through the point p.
Let V be a vector space over a field K. For any nonnegative integer k, we define the k < sup > th </ sup > tensor power of V to be the tensor product of V with itself k times:
Let V be a vector space over a field K, and let N be a subspace of V. We define an equivalence relation ~ on V by stating that x ~ y if x − y ∈ N. That is, x is related to y if one can be obtained from the other by adding an element of N. From this definition, one can deduce that any element of N is related to the zero vector ; in other words all the vectors in N get mapped into the equivalence class of the zero vector.
Let T be a linear mapping from the space of μ < sub > 1 </ sub >- integrable functions into the space of μ < sub > 2 </ sub >- measurable functions, and for 1 ≤ p, q ≤ ∞, define to be the operator norm of a continuous extension of T to
* Let C denote the vector space of all continuous real-valued functions on the interval, and define L: C → R by the rule
Let X be a scheme over a field k of characteristic p. Choose an open affine subset U = Spec R. Since X is a k-scheme, we get an inclusion of k in R. This forces R to be a characteristic p ring, so we can define the Frobenius endomorphism F for R as we did above.
Let us define the covariance matrix of the noise, reminding ourselves that this matrix has Hermitian symmetry, a property that will become useful in the derivation:
Let us define a price quasi-equilibrium with transfers as an allocation, a price vector p, and a vector of wealth levels w ( achieved by lump-sum transfers ) with ( where is the aggregate endowment of goods and is the production of firm j ) such that:
Let p be a point of M. Consider the space consisting of smooth maps defined in some neighborhood of p. We define an equivalence relation on as follows.
Let J ( R ) be the Jacobson radical of R. If U is a right module over a ring, R, and I is an right ideal in R, then define U · I to be the set of all ( finite ) sums of elements of the form u · i, where · is simply the action of R on U. Necessarily, U · I is a submodule of U.
0.646 seconds.