Opponents argue that CVBGs are increasingly vulnerable to arsenal ships and cruise missiles, especially those with supersonic flight and the ability to perform radical trajectory changes to avoid anti-missile systems.

Opponents of the indivisibility of human rights argue that economic, social and cultural rights are fundamentally different from civil and political rights and require completely different approaches.

* Opponents are allowed to hit each other with fists and feet, striking above the hip

* Opponents are allowed to strike their opponent with punches and kicks, including kicks below the waist, except for the groin.

Opponents who really get angry ( or cry, or otherwise lose control ) are more likely to make errors: make sure they are in your favor.

Opponents of the ( soft drink ) vending machines believe that soft drinks are a significant contributor to childhood obesity and tooth decay, and that allowing soft drink sales in schools encourages children to believe they are safe to consume in moderate to large quantities.

Opponents of Harrison have argued that a phrase in Pope Pius XII's legislation " Cardinals who have been deposed or who have resigned, however, are barred and may not be reinstated even for the purpose of voting ", though it speaks of someone deposed or resigned from the cardinalate, not of someone who may have incurred automatic excommunication but has not been officially declared excommunicated, means that, even if someone is permitted to attend, that does not automatically translate into electability.

Opponents of traducianism are sometimes found in the pro-life movement, because many among those who hold to pro-life views are of the opinion that embryos have a soul and are to be fully recognized as persons.

Opponents frown upon the Trunk-or-Treat as violation of the tradition of walking door-to-door on Halloween, and as exclusion of children that do not belong to these groups and thus are not informed about them.

Opponents of outpatient commitment laws argue that they unnecessarily limit freedom, force people to ingest dangerous medications, or are applied with racial and socioeconomic biases.

Opponents of affirmative action such as George Sher believe that affirmative action devalues the accomplishments of people who are chosen based on the social group to which they belong rather than their qualifications.

Opponents of the CDU are the Social Democratic Party of Germany ( SPD ), The Left party and Alliance ' 90 / The Greens.

Opponents to the theory deny the existence of the panthers or claim that witnesses are simply mis-identifying the native lynxes or " bobcats ".

* Opponents are not irrationally committed to the pot ( see sunk cost fallacy ).

* Opponents are sufficiently skilled and paying sufficient attention.

Opponents claim that a hermeneutic approach is too relativist and that their own interpretations are based on common-sense evaluation.

Opponents of gender-neutral language often argue that proponents of gender-neutral language are impinging on the right of free expression and promoting censorship.

Opponents of restoring voting rights are almost always politically conservative representatives, and since the President Nixon's Southern Strategy ( 1968 and 1972 ) almost exclusively Republican.

* Opponents of digital rights management argue that it creates perverse incentives for users to use pirated software when they are unable to access games they have legally purchased.

Opponents are concerned about air, water, and noise pollution ; environmental degradation of nearby food crops such as soy beans, corn, and alfalfa ; negative effects on the ethanol fuel market and competition with local ethanol producing farmers ; displacement of some local residents and population resettling ; potential industrial disasters including explosions, leaks, and spills, reminiscent of the recent explosion at a similar-capacity Texas City Oil Refinery that caused the deaths of 15 workers and injured over 100 ; contamination potential threats of terrorism ; and concerns of the sheer size of the facility, which will be over twice the area of Elk Point itself.

Opponents of the FMA claim polling of the public has shown a cautious response, with many polls indicating opposition, even in states such as Arizona and Colorado which are normally thought of as socially conservative.

Opponents are concerned about the risk of pregnancy and STIs such as HIV, arguing that even protected sex is risky given that some STIs may be spread regardless of the use of condoms, such as Herpes and HPV.

Opponents are concerned that the dredging may be harmful, perhaps leading to greater loss of marshland than the area saved.

Opponents of the proposed extension are also concerned about possible damage to water quality, and the disruption of wave quality at Trestles, a world famous surfing spot.

Opponents of the policy were concerned that the French deux nations would be interpreted in English as " two nations ", i. e., the end of a united Canada.

Opponents are concerned that there are too many ways in which contamination of the food supply and the environment can occur to make this form of production socially desirable, or even economically feasible.

Opponents to the project include concerned citizens and business owners who consider that the bus system is too expensive, is not needed, and will cause many businesses to lose business or have to close because of the construction.

Opponents to the reintroduction included hunters concerned that wolves would inhibit their ability to hunt the highest number of game species possible, ranchers concerned for the welfare of their animals, and land developers concerned that a species listed under the Endangered Species Act may restrict what they can do to their land.

Opponents pointed out that leading pro-treaty politicians had admitted if referendums had been held in countries other than Ireland, it would probably have been defeated there as well.

Opponents argue that because both goals do not have time limits, there is no reason to implement Article 23 legislation before universal suffrage.

Opponents of evolution claim that there is significant dissent on evolution within the scientific community.

This may be true, but there is no way to actually know your Opponents have the same limitations you do.

Opponents of the Endangered Species Act argue that with over 2, 000 endangered species listed, and only 27 delisted due to recovery, the success rate of 1 % over nearly three decades proves that there needs to be serious reform in their methods to actually help the endangered animals and plants.

Opponents of the view, such as Arminians, hold that such interpretations are read into the passages, rather than being their natural meanings ; while admitting that words like " world " and " all " in the Bible do not always mean " every human being ," they maintain that there are no grounds for taking the terms in a limited sense here.

Opponents argue that there would be no guarantee that the sales tax rates, once lowered, would not soon be raised again.

Opponents respond that there is no evidence of such voter fraud in Texas, so no remedy is required, especially if such a remedy would decrease voting by senior citizens, the disabled, and lower-income residents.

Opponents responded that this line of argument would establish every road a national road ; there would be no limit to federal power.

Opponents of naturalism, including advocates of the verstehen method, contended that there is a need for an interpretive approach to the study of human action, a technique radically different to natural science.

Opponents to the idea stress, however, that various factors don't necessarily follow the premise as well as the fact that there are various differences among European nations, states and regions.

Opponents of the speculation assert that ATV only had a one-off hit with Princess Pearl, and there were no other series afterward that could have retained the audience that eventually returned to TVB.

Opponents argued that the decision was flawed and possibly illegal as there was no Environmental Impact Assessment — a legal requirement incorporated into British law two weeks after the start of the 1988 public enquiry.

On October 5, 2008, Slifkin published an essay entitled In Defense of My Opponents in which he acknowledges that there is a reasonable basis for a ban on his books in certain communities.