Plaintiffs specifically challenged the statute's definition of " harmful to juveniles ," as well as the provisions governing internet dissemination of those materials.

Plaintiffs are represented by barristers drawn from the Senior Court bar whose members are licensed to argue cases before the Council and French Supreme Court ; any such barrister bears the title of Counsel at Senior Court ( avocat aux Conseils ).

Plaintiffs demanded that the Bank turn over the customer account records for more than 40, 000 foreign clients.

Plaintiffs then asked the Court to impose trial sanctions against the Bank in response to its non-production.

Plaintiffs have appealed this to the Ninth Circuit on grounds that the Vatican Bank is engages in commercial activity in the United States.

On July 1, 2010, the Plaintiffs submitted a request that the European Central Bank initiate an investigation of Vatican Bank money laundering and dealing in Nazi gold.

Plaintiffs introduced statements by President Barack Obama, from prepared remarks, that DADT " doesn't contribute to our national security ", " weakens our national security ", and that reversal is " essential for our national security ".

Plaintiffs here invoked the right to vote and have their vote counted, but they are permitted to vote and their vote is already counted.

This suit coming on this day before this court for withdrawal in the presence of Mr. R. Rangachariar, Advocate for the Plaintiffs herein, of Mr. K. Venugopala Iyengar, Advocate for Defendants 1 herein, and of Mr. R. Soundara rajan, Advocate for Defendants 2 to 5 herein, and the said Advocates for the parties hereto represent to this court that the suit has been settled out of court, it is ordered as follows :-

In a 2007 ruling in a trial relating to automobile emission regulation in Vermont, U. S. District Court Chief Judge William K. Sessions wrote, " Plaintiffs ’ own expert, Dr. Christy, agrees with the IPCC ’ s assessment that in the light of new evidence and taking into account remaining uncertainties, most of the observed warming over the last fifty years is likely to have been due to the increase in GHG concentrations.

Plaintiffs may amend once before an answer is filed, a defendant can amend once within 21 days of serving an answer, and if there is no right to amend, seek leave of court (" leave shall be given when justice so requires.

Plaintiffs generally may now file initial pleadings that seek alternative means of relief, and need not make the election of remedies until a judgment is rendered as to the liability of the defendant.

Plaintiffs lacking other evidence to support their claims may demand that defendants take an oath swearing their innocence, refusal thereof can result in a verdict for the plaintiff.

# That by retroactively extending copyright terms, Congress had violated the requirements of the Constitution's Copyright Clause, which gives Congress the following power: " To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries " ( emphasis added ) Plaintiffs argued that by reading this formulation so as to allow for any number of retroactive extensions, Congress could in practice guarantee an unlimited period of copyright protection, thus thwarting the intent of the clause.

Plaintiffs in a lawsuit pending at that time provided documentation showing that the local Monsanto factory knowingly discharged both mercury and PCB-laden waste into local creeks for over 40 years.

Plaintiffs will be able to sue for damages based on the duty of care.

:" Far from ‘ inactivity ,’ by choosing to forgo insurance, Plaintiffs are making an economic decision to try to pay for health care services later, out of pocket, rather than now, through the purchase of insurance.

The Plaintiffs ' second argument was that this act was " unconstitutional and the Executive Order was invalid ", because one of the stipulations of the act was that " prices, rent, wages and salaries shall be stabilized for a period of 90-days " as stated by President Nixon.

" These three Plaintiffs pursued but ultimately lost their claims for punitive damages.

Plaintiffs challenged a contract requiring developers to purchase Oldcastle Precast product for properties served by AT & T infrastructure.

The expert witness for the Plaintiffs in the case was Jessie Stricchiola, an internet search expert who first identified instances of ppc click fraud in 2001.

Plaintiffs have invested huge sums over the years in producing motion pictures in reliance upon a legal framework that, through the law of copyright, has ensured that they will have the exclusive right to copy and distribute those motion pictures for economic gain.

:“ Without permission of the copyright holder, and in clear violation of applicable law, Defendants have copied and sold these Vaad Works and kept the proceeds for themselves … In violation of Federal and State Laws, Defendants have pocketed millions of dollars in revenues that rightfully belonged to Plaintiffs, who would have used the money to continue publishing and disseminating the teachings of the Rebbe .”( page 3 )

Plaintiffs / respondents, parents of African-American children in seven states where public schools had recently been desegregated, brought a nation-wide class action lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service in federal district court, contending that IRS guidelines and procedures for determining whether private schools were racially discriminatory, and subsequent denial of tax exempt status to such schools, were insufficient.

Plaintiffs alleged both contributory and vicarious copyright infringement by Napster, and soon filed a motion for a preliminary injunction in order to stop the exchange of plaintiffs ' songs on the service immediately.

Actually, a tutorial for the Aimster software showed as its only examples of file sharing the sharing of copyrighted works, including copyrighted music that Plaintiffs.

Plaintiffs argued that this property was not slum housing and that it could not be taken for a project under the management of a private agency to be redeveloped for private use simply to make the community more attractive overall.

* Fourth Circuit's Turnitin. com Ruling Brings More Trouble for Plaintiffs

* Archives. gov-American Historical Association, Hugh Davis Graham, Stanley I. Kutler, National Security Archive, Organization of American Historians, Public Citizen, Inc., and The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, Plaintiffs, v. The National Archives and Records Administration, and John W. Carlin, Archivist of the United States, Defendants.

The Plaintiffs were represented by Ron Castan, Bryan Keon-Cohen and Greg McIntyre.

" Plaintiffs ( Scientologists ) have abused the federal court system by using it, inter alia, to destroy their opponents, rather than to resolve an actual dispute over trademark law or any other legal matter.

Plaintiffs ' rights would be defined, and in most cases limited, by the writs available to them.

Plaintiffs were represented by Anne M. Vohl, Esq.

It was argued by the Plaintiffs that this was an agreement that was reached in April 1970 and demanded that the wage increase take effect September 6, 1971.

The remedies sought by Plaintiffs include an accounting of Defendants ’ profits from the infringement, an impoundment of the infringing works, and injunctive relief to the extent to prevent Defendants from continuing to copy or sell infringing works in violation of the Copyright Act, the Lanham Act and other laws and to enjoin Defendants from interfering with Plaintiffs ’ attempts to publish and disseminate the teachings of the Rebbe .”( page 4 )

HFT also asserts it properly paid store managers as allowed by law, and unpaid overtime wages, liquidated damages, attorneys ' fees and costs should not be awarded to Plaintiffs.

Lessig refocused the Plaintiffs ' brief to emphasize the Copyright clause restriction, as well as the First Amendment argument from the Appeals case.

Removing works from the public domain violated Plaintiffs ' vested First Amendment interests.

Lord Justices Waller, Fox and May affirmed McClory's right to make James Bond films and enjoined the Plaintiffs from taking similar legal action against McClory in the future.

He served as counsel to the Plaintiffs in relation to the disastrous rail accident during a school outing from Armagh to Newry.

Citing Plaintiffs ' argument in court filings that intervening Supreme Court cases relating to marriage and to LGBT rights distinguished Perry from Baker, District Judge Vaughn Walker denied Defendant-Intervenors ' Motion for Summary Judgment.

Removing works from the public domain violated Plaintiffs ’ vested First Amendment interests.