Proponents of a voucher system are encouraged by private school sector growth as it is their view that private schools are typically more efficient at achieving results at a much lower per pupil cost when compared to public schools.

Proponents of this view sometimes point to examples of life's actions in the past that have resulted in dramatic change rather than stable equilibrium, such as the conversion of the Earth's atmosphere from a reducing environment to an oxygen-rich one.

Proponents of this view sometimes point to examples of life's actions in the past that have resulted in dramatic change rather than stable equilibrium, such as the conversion of the Earth's atmosphere from a reducing environment to an oxygen-rich one.

Proponents of this view, such as the author and neuroscientist Sam Harris, see morality as a budding science.

Proponents view OBE as a valuable replacement of the traditional model of relative ranking by ability and getting credit for merely sitting through class.

Proponents of the view that differences in IQ test scores between blacks and whites are ( primarily or largely ) genetically determined state that criticism of these views is based on political correctness.

Proponents of this view argue that the world outside one's own mind cannot be known and indeed might be nonexistent.

Proponents of this view ( and thus critics of dividends per se ) suggest that an eagerness to return profits to shareholders may indicate the management having run out of good ideas for the future of the company.

Proponents of this view tend to see the political question as whether society or the individual should teach sexual mores.

Proponents of this view include Francis of Assisi, Dietrich Bonhoeffer and in later life Leo Tolstoy.

Proponents of this view claim that the character of Polonius in Hamlet is a parody of Cecil, an interpretation which a minority of mainstream scholars have agreed with.

Proponents of fox hunting view it as an important part of rural culture and useful for reasons of conservation and pest control, while opponents argue that it is cruel and unnecessary.

Proponents of this view propose that immigrants need not completely abandon their culture and traditions in order to reach the goal that the melting pot theory seeks.

) Proponents of this compromise claim that the difference with this view and that of the assimilationists is that while their view of the melting pot essentially strips immigrants of their culture, the compromise allows immigrants to continue practicing and propagating their cultures from generation to generation and yet sustain and instill a love for their host country first and above all.

Proponents in contemporary political philosophy of such a view include Isaiah Berlin, Stuart Hampshire and Bernard Williams.

Proponents of this view often claim that sentences using empty names do not in fact express propositions, hence are not literally meaningful, despite appearances.

Proponents of this view argue that understanding the motivations and values of other cultures, rather than labeling them " evil ", is a better first step in eliminating violence.

Proponents of this view believe that the desire for monetary gain has led to the growth of the prison industry and the number of incarcerated individuals.

Proponents of this view are sometimes described as Christian Darwinists.

Proponents of this theory view traditional capitalism as a system that treats humanity as an input ( labour ) and cost ( wages ), with the result being the accumulation of capital.

Proponents of the view include Charles Spurgeon and George Eldon Ladd.

Proponents of this view, such as B. F. Skinner, often made parallels to previous pseudoscientific theories ( such as that of the four humours, the phlogiston theory of combustion, and the vital force theory of life ) that have all been successfully eliminated in attempting to establish their thesis about the nature of the mental.

Proponents of this idea argue either that such diversity is valuable in itself, to preserve human historical heritage and knowledge, or instrumentally valuable because it makes available more ways of solving problems and responding to catastrophes, natural or otherwise.

Proponents include Berkeley, Bishop of Cloyne, an Irish philosopher who advanced a theory he called immaterialism, later referred to as " subjective idealism ", contending that individuals can only know sensations and ideas of objects directly, not abstractions such as " matter ", and that ideas also depend upon being perceived for their very existence-esse est percipi ; " to be is to be perceived ".

Proponents of the Post Modern style attacked the Modernism with clever statements such as " less is a bore " and with captivating images such as Crown Hall sinking in Lake Michigan.

Proponents of gedoogbeleid argue that such a policy practices more consistency in legal protection than without it.

Proponents of this hypothesis have buttressed their case with linguistic, literary and archaeological interpretations, though such views have been called " archaeologically unsupportable ".

Proponents of funding for parochial schools argue that such an exclusion would violate the free exercise clause.

Proponents of several of the theories below have gone further to assert that there are yet other issues necessary to the analysis, such as interpersonal power struggles, community interactions, personal biases and other factors involved in deciding what is seen as truth.

Proponents of the intelligent design movement such as Cornelius G. Hunter, have asserted that the methodological naturalism upon which science is based is religious in nature.

Proponents attempt to associate this Christology with early church figures such as Justin Martyr, Lucian of Antioch, Eusebius of Caesarea, Arius, Eusebius of Nicomedia, Asterius the Sophist, Eunomius, and Ulfilas, as well as Felix, Bishop of Urgell.

Proponents of a legal market for organs say that the black-market nature of the current trade allows such tragedies and that regulation of the market could prevent them.

Proponents of Globalization, often referred to as advocates of Free Trade, embrace the economic philosophy of Neoliberalism articulated by economists working in the Neoclassical tradition, such as Milton Friedman.

Proponents of primordialist accounts of ethnic conflict argue that “ thnic groups and nationalities exist because there are traditions of belief and action towards primordial objects such as biological features and especially territorial location ”.

Proponents of pre-Columbian connections between Eurasia and the Americas have suggested even more distant locations such as modern-day Peru or Brazil.

Proponents of civil unions say that they provide practical equality for same-sex couples and solve the problems over areas such as hospital visitation rights and transfer of property caused by lack of legal recognition.

Proponents of Bilderberg conspiracy theories in the United States include individuals and groups such as the John Birch Society, political activist Phyllis Schlafly, writer Jim Tucker, political activist Lyndon LaRouche, radio host Alex Jones, and politician Jesse Ventura, who made the Bilderberg group a topic of a 2009 episode of his TruTV series Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura.

Proponents such as Maria Chattha argue that states will cooperate irrespective of relative gains, and are thus concerned with absolute gains.

Proponents such as Andrew Linklater, Robert W. Cox and Ken Booth focus on the need for human emancipation from States.

Proponents of the measure contend that only dangerous cults have been listed as such, and state secularism ensures religious freedom in France.

Proponents of this theory, such as Eric Hobsbawm, argue that ethnicity and notions of ethnic pride, such as nationalism, are purely modern inventions, appearing only in the modern period of world history.