[permalink] [id link]
The Avimimus fossils were initially described as having come from the Djadokta Formation by Kurzanov ; however, in a 2006 description of a new specimen, Watabe and colleagues noted that Kurzanov was probably mistaken about the provenance, and it is more likely that Avimimus hailed from the more recent Nemegt Formation.
from
Wikipedia
Some Related Sentences
Avimimus and were
The jaws of Avimimus were thought to form a parrot-like beak, lacking teeth, and a thorough review of the holotype specimen's anatomy confirmed that no teeth were preserved, although a series of toothlike projections along the tip of the premaxilla were.
Kurzanov was so convinced they were attachment points for feathers that he concluded that Avimimus may have been capable of weak flight.
The legs were extremely long and slender, suggesting that Avimimus was a highly specialized runner.
The remains of Avimimus were recovered by Russian paleontologists and officially described by Dr. Sergei Kurzanov in 1981.
Avimimus and described
A second nearly complete specimen of Avimimus was discovered in 1996 and described in 2000 by Watabe and colleagues.
Avimimus and from
A variety of isolated bones that have been attributed to Avimimus but differ from A. portentosus may represent one or more distinct species, referred to as Avimimus sp ..
Avimimus and by
In 2008 a team of Canadian, American, and Mongolian paleontologists headed by Phil Currie reported the discovery of an extensive bonebed of Avimimus sp.
Avimimus and Kurzanov
Kurzanov himself, however, believed that Avimimus was an insectivore.
Because no tail was found with the original find, Kurzanov mistakenly concluded that Avimimus lacked a tail in life.
In fact, Kurzanov argued that Avimimus, rather than the famous early bird Archaeopteryx, was close to the direct ancestor of modern birds, and that Archaeopteryx was not as closely related to birds as had previously been suggested.
Kurzanov placed Avimimus in its own family, Avimimidae, in 1981.
Avimimus and was
Avimimus was a small dinosaur with a length of 1. 5 m ( 5 ft ).
The foramen magnum, the hole allowing the spinal cord to connect with the brain, was proportionally large in Avimimus.
The proportions of the leg bones add further weight to the idea of Avimimus was quick on its feet.
Avimimus was originally suggested to be a very close relative of birds, given its unique suite of bird-like features not known in other dinosaurs at the time.
Avimimus and is
This is also consistent with the hypothesis that Avimimus had a proportionally large brain.
Unlike oviraptorids and caenagnathids, the back vertebrae lack openings for air sacs, suggesting that Avimimus is more primitive than these animals.
The presence of feathers is now widely accepted, but most paleontologists do not believe Avimimus could fly.
More recent studies have shown that Avimimus is best grouped within the Oviraptoridae, within the subgroup Elmisaurinae.
Avimimus and more
The team reported finding abundant bones of at least ten individuals of Avimimus, but the deposit may hold more.
Most modern scientists find that Avimimus in fact belongs to a diverse group of bird-like dinosaurs more primitive than Archaeopteryx, the oviraptorosaurs.
Avimimus and .
Similarly, quill knobs ( anchor points for wing feathers on the ulna ) have been reported in the oviraptorosaurian species Avimimus portentosus.
The small teeth or possible lack thereof in Avimimus suggests that it may have been an herbivore or omnivore.
However, subsequent Avimimus finds containing caudal vertebrae have confirmed the presence of a tail.
Additionally, these authors identified a number of small theropod footprints in the same area as belonging to Avimimus.
fossils and were
The fossils were dated to between 4. 32 and 4. 51 million years old.
Its chemical composition makes it difficult to match the amber to its producers – it is most similar to the resins produced by flowering plants ; however, there are no flowering plant fossils until the Cretaceous, and they were not common until the Upper Cretaceous.
In the 1840s fossils of brachiopods and trilobites from the Silurian period were discovered at Woolshed Creek near Duntroon.
At the time, these were the oldest fossils discovered in Australia, though this record has now been far surpassed.
Walcott, led by scientific opinion at the time, attempted to categorise all fossils into living taxa, and as a result, the fossils were regarded as little more than curiosities at the time.
Gould suggests that the extraordinary diversity of the fossils indicate that life forms at the time were much more diverse than those that survive today, and that many of the unique lineages were evolutionary experiments that became extinct.
Scientific consensus is that these fossils were eroded from their original locations and then re-buried in much later sediments ( also known as reworked fossils ).
Similar plant and animal fossils are found around different continent shores, suggesting that they were once joined.
Despite a large number of Homo fossils finds, chimpanzee fossils ( genus Pan ) were not described until 2005.
Despite the 1891 discovery by Eugène Dubois of what is now called Homo erectus at Trinil, Java, it was only in the 1920s when such fossils were discovered in Africa, that intermediate species began to accumulate.
During the 1960s and 1970s hundreds of fossils were found, particularly in East Africa in the regions of the Olduvai gorge and Lake Turkana.
The first fossils of Homo erectus were discovered by Dutch physician Eugene Dubois in 1891 on the Indonesian island of Java.
They argue that when most of the Oldowan tools were found in association with human fossils, Homo was always present, but Paranthropus was not.
The study of fossils across geological time, how they were formed, and the evolutionary relationships between taxa ( phylogeny ) are some of the most important functions of the science of paleontology.
The observations that certain fossils were associated with certain rock strata led early geologists to recognize a geological timescale in the 19th century.
Fossil resin often contains other fossils called inclusions that were captured by the sticky resin.
Concretions, spherical or ovoid-shaped nodules found in some sedimentary strata, were once thought to be dinosaur eggs, and are often mistaken for fossils as well.
Various explanations have been put forth throughout history to explain what fossils are and how they came to be where they were found.
Greek scholar Aristotle realized that fossil seashells from rocks were similar to those found on the beach, indicating the fossils were once living animals.
Leonardo da Vinci concurred with Aristotle's view that fossils were the remains of ancient life.
0.479 seconds.