Help


[permalink] [id link]
+
Page "Baron Gerard" ¶ 3
from Wikipedia
Edit
Promote Demote Fragment Fix

Some Related Sentences

barony and passed
All his other titles became extinct except for the Pelham Baronetcy of Laughton and the barony of Pelham of Stanmer, which were passed on to his first cousin once removed, Thomas Pelham ( for further history of these titles, see the Earl of Chichester ).
When that family died out in 1508, the manor and castle passed to George Manners, who inherited the castle and barony through his mother.
He was succeeded in the barony of Strange, which could be passed on through female lines, by his first cousin once removed, James Murray, 2nd Duke of Atholl.
The barony passed to his daughter, Sophia Charlotte ( 1762 – 1835 ), who married the Hon.
The title may pass through the female line when there is no male heir, and accordingly, when the 3rd earl, Edward Manners ( c. 1548 – 1587 ), left no sons, the barony of Ros passed to the family of his daughter Elizabeth ( d. 1591 ) who became the wife of William Cecil, Earl of Exeter.
Gilles de Rais, a Laval and comrade in arms of Joan of Arc, was executed without an heir, so the barony passed successively to the families of Tournemine, Annebaut and Gondi.
His only daughter and heir married Ralph Stafford, 1st Earl of Stafford, and the de jure barony passed with the Earldom of Stafford until 1521, when Edward Stafford, 3rd Duke of Buckingham was attainted.
He never married and on his death in 1957 the baronies of Murray and Glenlyon and earldom of Strange became extinct, the barony of Percy was passed on to his kinsman the 10th Duke of Northumberland ( see Baron Percy ), while the barony of Strange fell into abeyance ( see Baron Strange ).
Eyemouth fell within the feudal barony of Coldingham, possessed until the early 17th century by Coldingham Priory, after which it passed to the Home family, who had held lands in that barony since at least the 15th century.
When John Hervey, 1st Earl of Bristol, died in January 1751, the earldom of Bristol and the barony of Hervey, along with the estates of Ickworth House, passed to his grandson George, the eldest son of John, Lord Hervey.
The barony was then inherited by his only daughter, Elizabeth, while the earldom passed to a male heir, his younger brother.
They had no sons and Lord Northampton was succeeded in the barony of Compton, which could be passed on through female lines, by his daughter Lady Charlotte.
The barony of Paget, which could be passed on through the female line, devolved on his cousin Henry Bayly, who became the ninth Baron.
The barony became extinct on the death of his son, the eighth Earl, in 1884, while the Scottish titles were passed on to the Earl's uncle, the ninth Earl.
The baronetcy and barony, which only could be passed on to male heirs, were inherited by the late Earl's younger brother, the fourth Baron ( see the Baron Strathspey for later history of these titles ).
The claim to the barony of FitzWalter was passed on to the fifth Earl's heir-general Henry Mildmay, de jure fifteenth Baron.
He was childless and on his death in 1791 the earldom passed to his uncle, the fourth Earl of Orford ( see the Earl of Orford for later history of this title ), while the barony of Clinton became dormant.
The barony, however, passed to his daughter Elizabeth, who would later marry the first Earl of Worcester.
He had no surviving male issue, so the Marquesate and his other non-inherited titles became extinct on his death in 1491, whilst the barony passed de jure to his younger brother Maurice.
His son, the ninth Baron, was created Earl of Berkeley and Viscount Dursley, which remained united to the barony until the death of the sixth Earl in 1882, when the earldom passed to a male heir and the barony passed to a female one, Louisa Milman.

barony and line
On the death in 1980 of his grandson, the ninth Earl, the line of the fifth Earl failed and the barony of Dunmore became extinct.
Their daughter, Maud Arden, married Sir Thomas Stanley, and the barony is still invested in that line.
Second in line to the barony is the present holder's grandson Thomas Michael Jonathan Willoughby ( b. 2007 )
The barony of Loughneugh and viscountcy of Massereene were inherited according to the special remainder ( which allowed them to be passed on through the female line ) by his daughter Harriet, the ninth Viscountess.
Born William Chichester, he succeeded to the estates of his cousin William O ' Neill, 3rd Viscount O ' Neill, in 1855 ( on whose death the viscountcy and barony of O ' Neill became extinct ) and assumed by Royal license the surname of O ' Neill in lieu of Chichester in order to inherit the lands of his cousin, despite not being descended in the male line from an O ' Neill.
Lord Seaford is also high in line of succession to the barony of Howard de Walden.
The letters patent directed that, if the holder of the barony ever succeeded to the earldom, then he would be automatically deprived of the barony as if he died naturally without issue, the barony being diverted to another line.
After the abeyance of 1463 the " right " to barony Fauconberg which resulted in the termination of 1903 was held together with the barony Conyers ; the two baronies then have followed the same way or line into the abeyance of 1948.
The castle, and the barony, remained within the Auchinleck family until 1504 when due to a failing Auchinleck male line, and the marriage of a daughter of Sir John Auchinleck to a Thomas Boswell, the estate and the title were granted to Boswell by King James IV.
The barony of Scrope of Bolton seems then to have become dormant ; and although the title might, it would appear, have been claimed through the female line by the representative of Charles Jones ( d. 1840 ) of Caton, Lancashire, no such claim was ever made.
Second in line to the barony is his grandson Thomas Michael Jonathan Willoughby ( b. 2007 )
The barony of Clinton has also survived to the present day, but is able to pass through the female line.
In the 10th century, the line of the lords of Massy was established ; their title of nobility was to become a barony ( nowadays the Grimaldi-Monaco family )..

barony and succession
As of 30 June 2006, the present holder of the barony has not successfully proven his succession to the baronetcy and is therefore not on the Official Roll of the Baronetage.
As of 30 June 2006, the present holder of the barony has not successfully proven his succession to the Bagot baronetcy and is therefore not on the Official Roll of the Baronetage.
As of 30 June 2006, the present holder of the barony has not successfully proven his succession to the baronetcy and is therefore not on the Official Roll of the Baronetage, with the baronetcy considered dormant.
As of 30 June 2006, the present holder of the barony has not successfully proven his succession to the baronetcy and is therefore not on the Official Roll of the Baronetage.
As of 30 June 2006, the present holder of the barony has not successfully proven his succession to the baronetcy and is therefore not on the Official Roll of the Baronetage, with the baronetcy considered dormant.
As of 30 June 2006, the present holder of the barony has not successfully proven his succession to the baronetcy and is therefore not on the Official Roll of the Baronetage, with the baronetcy considered dormant.
As of 30 June 2006, the present holder of the barony has not successfully proven his succession to the baronetcy and is therefore not on the Official Roll of the Baronetage, with the baronetcy considered dormant.
As of 30 June 2006, the present holder of the barony has not successfully proven his succession to the baronetcy and is therefore not on the Official Roll of the Baronetage.
As of 30 June 2006, the claimed present holder of the barony has not successfully proven his succession to the baronetcy and is therefore not on the Official Roll of the Baronetage.
As of 30 June 2006, the present holder of the barony has not successfully proven his succession to the baronetcy and is therefore not on the Official Roll of the Baronetage.
As of 30 June 2006, the present holder of the barony has not successfully proven his succession to the baronetcy and is therefore not on the Official Roll of the Baronetage ( for more information follow this link ).
The holders of the barony from the 6th Baron onwards have not successfully proven their succession to the baronetcy and therefore do not appear on the Official Roll of the Baronetage ( for more information follow this link ).
As of 30 June 2006, the present holder of the barony has not successfully proven his succession to the baronetcies and is therefore not on the Official Roll of the Baronetage.
As of 30 June 2006, the present holder of the barony has not successfully proven his succession to the baronetcy and is therefore not on the Official Roll of the Baronetage.
As of 30 June 2006, the present holder of the barony has not successfully proven his succession to the baronetcy of 1763 and is therefore not on the Official Roll of the Baronetage, with the baronetcy considered dormant ( for more information follow this link ).

0.886 seconds.