[permalink] [id link]
The cut-elimination ( or equivalently the normalization of the underlying calculus if there is one ) implies the consistency of the calculus: since there is obviously no cut-free proof of falsity, there is no contradiction in general.
from
Wikipedia
Some Related Sentences
cut-elimination and calculus
The cut-elimination theorem for a calculus says that every proof involving Cut can be transformed ( generally, by a constructive method ) into a proof without Cut, and hence that Cut is admissible.
The cut-elimination theorem is thus crucial to the applications of sequent calculus in automated deduction: it states that all uses of the cut rule can be eliminated from a proof, implying that any provable sequent can be given a cut-free proof.
A sequent calculus for the logic was given, but it lacked a cut-elimination theorem ; instead the sense of the calculus was established through a denotational semantics.
The principal novelty of the calculus of structures was its pervasive use of deep inference, which it was argued is necessary for calculi combining commutative and noncommutative operators ; this explanation concurs with the difficulty of designing sequent systems for pomset logic that have cut-elimination.
The cut-elimination theorem ( or Gentzen's Hauptsatz ) is the central result establishing the significance of the sequent calculus.
The cut-elimination theorem states that any judgement that possesses a proof in the sequent calculus that makes use of the cut rule also possesses a cut-free proof, that is, a proof that does not make use of the cut rule.
Gerhard Gentzen is the founder of proof-theoretic semantics, providing the formal basis for it in his account of cut-elimination for the sequent calculus, and some provocative philosophical remarks about locating the meaning of logical connectives in their introduction rules within natural deduction.
In brief, a language, which is understood to be associated with certain patterns of inference, has logical harmony if it is always possible to recover analytic proofs from arbitrary demonstrations, as can be shown for the sequent calculus by means of cut-elimination theorems and for natural deduction by means of normalisation theorems.
# If the formula is valid, then by completeness of cut-free sequent calculus, which follows from Gentzen's cut-elimination theorem, there is a cut-free proof of.
However, sequent calculus and cut-elimination were not known at the time of Herbrand's theorem, and Herbrand had to prove his theorem in a more complicated way.
cut-elimination and is
It is sound and complete with respect to intuitionistic logic and admits a similar cut-elimination proof.
Although the fundamental idea behind the analytic tableau method is derived from the cut-elimination theorem of structural proof theory, the origins of tableau calculi lie in the meaning ( or semantics ) of the logical connectives, as the connection with proof theory was made only in recent decades.
Deep inference is not important in logic outside of structural proof theory, since the phenomena that lead to the proposal of formal systems with deep inference are all related to the cut-elimination theorem.
Takeuti's conjecture is the conjecture of Gaisi Takeuti that a sequent formalisation of second-order logic has cut-elimination ( Takeuti 1953 ).
cut-elimination and consistency
Gentzen's so-called " Main Theorem " ( Hauptsatz ) about LK and LJ was the cut-elimination theorem, a result with far-reaching meta-theoretic consequences, including consistency.
Gentzen further demonstrated the power and flexibility of this technique a few years later, applying a cut-elimination argument to give a ( transfinite ) proof of the consistency of Peano arithmetic, in surprising response to Gödel's incompleteness theorems.
cut-elimination and proof
A proof of cut-elimination in simple type theory.
cut-elimination and .
The cut-elimination theorem states that ( for a given system ) any sequent provable using the rule Cut can be proved without use of this rule.
If we think of as a theorem, then cut-elimination simply says that a lemma used to prove this theorem can be inlined.
Due to the complexity of cut-elimination, herbrand disjunctions with cuts can be non-elementarily smaller than a standard herbrand disjunction.
equivalently and normalization
The denominator is a transform of the auxiliary polynomial ( equivalently, reversing the order of coefficients ); one could also use any multiple of this, but this normalization is chosen both because of the simple relation to the auxiliary polynomial, and so that.
With the normalization used in the previous section, G ( 0 ) gives the mean number of diffusers in the volume < N >, or equivalently — with knowledge of the observation volume size — the mean concentration:
equivalently and underlying
The construction uses 2 × 2 minor determinants, or equivalently the second exterior power of the underlying vector space of dimension 4.
Exchange-traded funds track underlying positions, so an investment performs equivalently to purchasing that number of physical positions, though the fund may in fact not directly purchase the positions, and instead use derivatives ( especially futures ) to produce the position.
equivalently and calculus
In mathematics, particularly in calculus, a stationary point is an input to a function where the derivative is zero ( equivalently, the slope is zero ): where the function " stops " increasing or decreasing ( hence the name ).
equivalently and if
Similarly, P is said to satisfy the descending chain condition ( DCC ) if every descending chain of elements eventually terminates, or equivalently if any descending sequence
If μ is not a positive measure, then N is μ-null if N is | μ |- null, where | μ | is the total variation of μ ; equivalently, if every measurable subset A of N satisfies μ ( A )
For a preorder "", a relation "<" can be defined as a < b if and only if ( a b and not b a ), or equivalently, using the equivalence relation introduced above, ( a b and not a ~ b ).
In mathematics, especially in set theory, a set A is a subset of a set B, or equivalently B is a superset of A, if A is " contained " inside B, that is, all elements of A are also elements of B.
; Alexandrov topology: A space X has the Alexandrov topology ( or is finitely generated ) if arbitrary intersections of open sets in X are open, or equivalently, if arbitrary unions of closed sets are closed, or, again equvalently, if the open sets are the upper sets of a poset.
Universal constructions are more general than adjoint functor pairs: a universal construction is like an optimization problem ; it gives rise to an adjoint pair if and only if this problem has a solution for every object of C ( equivalently, every object of D ).
On the other hand, if the null hypothesis that cannot be rejected, then equivalently the hypothesis of no causal effect of on y cannot be rejected.
if is divisible by ( or equivalently if and have the same remainder when divided by ).
A subset S of a partially ordered set P is called bounded if it has both an upper and a lower bound, or equivalently, if it is contained in an interval.
Otherwise, one can equivalently define a function to be Lipschitz continuous if and only if there exists a constant K ≥ 0 such that, for all x < sub > 1 </ sub > ≠ x < sub > 2 </ sub >,
Then two points x and y in X are topologically distinguishable if they do not have exactly the same neighbourhoods ( or equivalently the same open neighbourhoods ); that is, at least one of them has a neighbourhood that is not a neighbourhood of the other ( or equivalently there is an open set that one point belongs to but the other point does not ).
However, universal constructions are more general than adjoint functors: a universal construction is like an optimization problem ; it gives rise to an adjoint pair if and only if this problem has a solution for every object of D ( equivalently, every object of C ).
* A uniform space is complete if every Cauchy net in it converges ( or equivalently every Cauchy filter in it converges ).
In this case, if and only if every element of I is an element of J, or equivalently, if every multiple of the integer n is a multiple of m. In other words, if and only if m divides n ( or m is a factor of n ).
equivalently and there
* How many different linear extensions are there for a given partial order, or, equivalently, how many different topological orderings are there for a given directed acyclic graph?
For every, there exists a polynomial function p over C such that for all x in, we have, or equivalently, the supremum norm.
For each ( non-strict ) total order ≤ there is an associated asymmetric ( hence irreflexive ) relation <, called a strict total order, which can equivalently be defined in two ways:
The vertical axis represents the real interest rate, i. Since this is a non-dynamic model, there is a fixed relationship between the nominal interest rate and the real interest rate ( the former equals the latter plus the expected inflation rate which is exogenous in the short run ); therefore variables such as money demand which actually depend on the nominal interest rate can equivalently be expressed as depending on the real interest rate.
Then there does not exist a strictly increasing sequence of open sets ( equivalently
Through the observations he made in the following year, Richer determined that the clock was 2½ minutes per day slower than at Paris, or equivalently the length of a pendulum with a swing of one second there was 1¼ Paris lines, or 2. 6 mm, shorter than at Paris.
A multitree ( also called a strongly ambiguous graph or a mangrove ) is a directed graph in which there is at most one directed path ( in either direction ) between any two nodes ; equivalently, it is a DAG in which, for every node v, the set of nodes reachable from v forms a tree.
So the spectrum includes the set of approximate eigenvalues, which are those λ such that is not bounded below ; equivalently, it is the set of λ for which there is a sequence of unit vectors x < sub > 1 </ sub >, x < sub > 2 </ sub >, ... for which
The condition Ext < sup > 1 </ sup >( A, Z ) = 0 can be equivalently formulated as follows: whenever B is an abelian group and f: B → A is a surjective group homomorphism whose kernel is isomorphic to the group of integers Z, then there exists a group homomorphism g: A → B with fg = id < sub > A </ sub >.
For any x > 0, there exists a unique integer n such that 2 < sup > n </ sup > ≤ x < 2 < sup > n + 1 </ sup >, or equivalently 1 ≤ 2 < sup >− n </ sup > x < 2.
where is any element of, or equivalently as any level set of the quotient map A choice of gives a base point of and an identification of with but there is no natural choice, nor a natural identification of with
( 1 ) We could just stop there and say that the dividend divided by the divisor is the quotient written at the top with the remainder written at the bottom ; equivalently we could write the answer as the quotient followed by a fraction that is the remainder divided by the dividend.
Or equivalently, whether there exists a number whose aliquot sequence never terminates.
If R is complete, then there exists a finitely-generated R-module M ≠ 0 such that some ( equivalently every ) system of parameters for R is a regular sequence on M.
Intuitively, the fundamental group measures how the holes behave on a space ; if there are no holes, the fundamental group is trivial — equivalently, the space is simply connected.
They are defined by the condition that the coefficients of the highest-order derivatives be positive, which implies the key property that the principal symbol is invertible, or equivalently that there are no real characteristic directions.
* Running on treadmills is easier than running on an equivalently flat distance outdoors because the ground is smooth and there is no wind resistance.
The odd girth is, equivalently, the smallest odd number g for which there exists a homomorphism.
0.750 seconds.