Many Canadian editors, though, use the Canadian Oxford Dictionary, often along with the chapter on spelling in Editing Canadian English, and, where necessary ( depending on context ), one or more other references.

" Another joke puts a question concerning the definition of blunderbuss to " the four wise clerks of Oxenford " ( a reference to Chaucer's Clerk ; Tolkien had worked for Henry Bradley, one of the four main editors of the Oxford English Dictionary ):

* Levine, Amy-Jill and Brettler, Marc Z., editors, The Jewish Annotated New Testament, Oxford University Press, USA, ( 15 November 2011 ), hardcover, 700 pages,

The New Oxford American Dictionary ( NOAD ) is a single-volume dictionary of American English compiled by American editors at the Oxford University Press.

* New Oxford American Dictionary, First Edition, Elizabeth J. Jewell and Frank R. Abate ( editors ), 2192 pages, September 2001, Oxford University Press, ISBN 0-19-511227-X.

* New Oxford American Dictionary, Third Edition, Angus Stevenson and Christine A. Lindberg ( editors ), 2096 pages, August 2010, Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-539288-3.

Historian John Stow, writing in his Survey of London ( 1598 ), noted ' this place is called the Star Chamber, because the roof thereof is decked with the likeness of stars gilt ...' The chamber's description is regarded as the most likely explanation for its name by the editors of the Oxford English Dictionary.

By the 1820s and 1830s, well-known liberals like Thomas Wakley and other radical editors of The Lancet were using Paley's aging examples to attack the establishment's control over medical and scientific education in Durham, London, Oxford and Cambridge.

The most recent and authoritative Middleton canon has been established by the editors of the Oxford Middleton ( 2007 ).

The editors of the Oxford Shakespeare conclude from the play's incidence of rare vocabulary, use of colloquialisms in verse, pause patterns, and infrequent rhyming that the play was composed in 1596, after Richard II but before Henry IV, Part I.

The editors of the New Oxford Annotated Bible suggest that Tarshish is either Tartessos or Sardinia.

* Rose, Herbert Jennings, " Echidna " in The Oxford Classical Dictionary, Hammond and Scullard ( editors ), Second Edition, Oxford University Press, 1992.

— editors ( 1996 ): The Oxford Companion to Australian Cricket, OUP.

reference: Carson III, Culley C., Kirby, Roger S., Goldstein, Irwin, editors, " Textbook of Erectile Dysfunction " Oxford, U. K .; Isis Medical Media, Ltd., 1999 ; Moreland, R. B.

– editors ( 1996 ): The Oxford Campanion to Australian Cricket, Oxford University Press.

* Pennington, D. H. & Thomas, Keith ( editors ) Puritans and Revolutionaries: essays in seventeenth-century history presented to Christopher Hill, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978.

His theory concerning the Liber Tricolumnis, was rejected by Liebermann and other editors of the Dialogus ( A. Hughes, C. G. Crump and C. Johnson, Oxford, 1902 ).

* God and Time: Essays on the Divine Nature, Gregory E. Ganssle and David M. Woodruff ( editors ), 2002, Oxford University Press, ISBN 0-19-512965-2

It has been used as an information source for the makers of many later dictionaries, including editors of the Oxford English Dictionary, who cited it over 2, 000 times in the first edition.

Out of all the Fugitive poets, Norton poetry editors Richard Ellmann and Robert O ' Clair opined that, " poems were among the most remarkable ," characterizing his poetry as " quirky " and " at times eccentric.

Holmes Norton specialized in freedom of speech cases, and her work included winning a Supreme Court case on behalf of the white racist National States ' Rights Party, a victory she put into perspective in an interview with one of the District of Columbia Bar's website editors: " I defended the First Amendment, and you seldom get to defend the First Amendment by defending people you like ... You don ’ t know whether the First Amendment is alive and well until it is tested by people with despicable ideas.

Current History ’ s board of contributing editors today includes Catherine Boone ( University of Texas at Austin ); Bruce Cumings ( University of Chicago ); Deborah Davis ( Yale University ); David B. H. Denoon ( New York University ); Larry Diamond ( Stanford University ); Michele Dunne ( Carnegie Endowment for International Peace ); Barry Eichengreen ( University of California, Berkeley ); C. Christine Fair ( Georgetown University ); Sumit Ganguly ( Indiana University ); Marshall Goldman ( Wellesley College ); G. John Ikenberry ( Princeton University ); Michael T. Klare ( Hampshire College ); Joshua Kurlantzick ( Council on Foreign Relations ); Michael McFaul ( Stanford University, currently on leave ); Rajan Menon ( Lehigh University ); Augustus Richard Norton ( Boston University ); Joseph Nye ( Harvard University ); Michael Shifter ( Inter-American Dialogue ); Arturo Valenzuela ( Georgetown University, currently on leave ); and Jeffrey Wasserstrom ( University of California, Irvine ).

CNET gave Norton GoBack 4. 0 an editors ' rating of 3. 5 out of five stars, but the average user rating was only 1. 5 stars.

) Norton points out that the original edition's supplied words, printed in Roman type in 1611 as opposed to the black-letter of the main text, were very inadequately marked ; although many subsequent editors have tried to revise them ( especially Scrivener ), Norton feels that they are misunderstood by most readers and are ineffective even for those who know their purpose.

Regarding Berryman's earliest success in the field of poetry, the Norton Anthology of Modern Poetry editors note that " Berryman's early work formed part of a volume entitled Five Young American Poets, published by New Directions in 1940.

And according to the editors of The Norton Anthology of Modern Poetry, he lived turbulently.

The editors of The Norton Anthology of Modern Poetry note that " the influence of Yeats, Auden, Hopkins, Crane, and Pound on him was strong, and Berryman's own voice — by turns nerve-racked and sportive — took some time to be heard.

After surveying Berryman's career and accomplishments, the editors of The Norton Anthology of Modern Poetry stated, " What seems likely to survive of his poetry is its pungent and many-leveled portrait of a complex personality which, for all its eccentricity, stayed close to the center of the intellectual and emotional life of the mid-century and after.

In an autobiographical piece that Orwell sent to the editors of Twentieth Century Authors in 1940, he wrote: " The writers I care about most and never grow tired of are: Shakespeare, Swift, Fielding, Dickens, Charles Reade, Flaubert and, among modern writers, James Joyce, T. S. Eliot and D. H. Lawrence.

Most later 18th-century editors of Shakespeare dismissed Pope's creatively motivated approach to textual criticism.

"" Playing the Cook ": Nurturing Men in Titus Andronicus ", in Holger Klein and Rowland Wymer ( editors ), Shakespeare and History ( Shakespeare Yearbook ), ( Lewiston: The Edwin Mellen Press, 1996 ), 327 – 54

* Starks, Lisa S. " Cinema of Cruelty: Powers of Horror in Julie Taymor's Titus ", in Lisa S. Starks and Courtney Lehmann ( editors ) The Reel Shakespeare: Alternative Cinema and Theory ( London: Associated University Press, 2002 ), 121 – 142

" Marcus writes that this is seen by editors as out of character for Shakespeare and is therefore an indication that he did not write A Shrew.

* Bean, John C. " Comic Structure and the Humanizing of Kate in The Taming of the Shrew ", in Carolyn Ruth Swift Lenz, Gayle Greene and Carol Thomas Neely ( editors ), The Woman's Part: Feminist Criticism of Shakespeare ( Illinois: University of Illinois Press, 1980 ), 65 – 78

However, as Gayle Greene so aptly recognizes, it must be addressed that “ feminist criticism Shakespeare is nearly as concerned with the biases of Shakespeare ’ s interpretors – critics, directors, editors – as with Shakespeare himself .”

" The Frame of Disorder – Henry VI " in John Russell Brown and Bernard Harris ( editors ), Early Shakespeare ( London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1961 ), 72 – 99

" Shakespeare and English History ", in Margreta de Grazia and Stanley Wells ( editors ), The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001 ), 167 – 183

" The Frame of Disorder – Henry VI " in John Russell Brown and Bernard Harris ( editors ), Early Shakespeare ( London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1961 ), 72 – 99

" Shakespeare and English History ", in Margreta de Grazia and Stanley Wells ( editors ), The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001 ), 167 – 183

" The Frame of Disorder – Henry VI " in John Russell Brown and Bernard Harris ( editors ), Early Shakespeare ( London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1961 ), 72 – 99

" Shakespeare and English History ", in Margreta de Grazia and Stanley Wells ( editors ), The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001 ), 167 – 183

In 1986, the Oxford Shakespeare edition of Shakespeare's works rendered the character's name as Oldcastle, rather than Falstaff, in Henry IV, Part 1 ( although not, confusingly, in Part 2 ), as a consequence of the editors ' aim to present the plays as they would have appeared during their original performances.

Johann Ludwig Tieck called him the " model of a light and rare talent ", and Charles Lamb wrote that he was a " prose Shakespeare "; Professor Ward, one of Heywood's most sympathetic editors, pointed out that Heywood had a keen eye for dramatic situations and great constructive skill, but his powers of characterization were not on a par with his stagecraft.

The editors of the 1986 Oxford Edition of Shakespeare make the assumption that Wilkins was the co-author of Pericles and draw heavily upon The Painful Adventures in their controversial reconstructed text of the play.

Modern editors generally agree that Shakespeare is responsible for almost exactly half the play — 827 lines — the main portion after scene 9 that follows the story of Pericles and Marina.