They would have to go west through the narrow river valley that separated Leyte from Samar and hope that it didn't close in before they returned.

They were married over the week-end, though he was easily sixty and she could not have been even thirty.

`` They wouldn't have sold me in the first place if there'd been food enough to go around ''.

They have pulled out all my teeth and now she will carve out my tongue with her hacksaw!!

They couldn't have much dough, but then none of the freight-bums Feathertop rolled had much.

They have also led the nation in the direction of a welfare state.

They believe that if the South had been let alone it would have produced a civilization superior to that of modern America.

They, too, have fragments of the go code with them.

As Wisman put it, `` They have separate pieces of the pie, and we have the whole pie.

They are huge areas which have been swept by winds for so many centuries that there is no soil left, but only deep bare ridges fifty or sixty yards apart with ravines between them thirty or forty feet deep and the only thing that moves is a scuttling layer of sand.

They are in general those fears that once seemed to have been amenable to prayer or ritual.

They are presumed to have plunged to a common grave in this fatal embrace.

They have indicated the direction but they have not been explicit enough, I believe, in pointing out Faulkner's independence, his questioning if not indeed challenging the Southern tradition.

They have an ancestry extending back, however, at least to 1728, when William Byrd described the Lubberlanders he encountered in the back country of Virginia and North Carolina.

They tell us, sir, that we are free, because we have in one hand a ballot, and in the other a stock certificate.

They all have this in common: the earth is situated near the center of the deferent.

They were in fact quietly laughing at him, for their King wished to have nothing to do with the Western world.

On December 21, the day that the Irish House of Commons petitioned for removal of Sir Constantine Phipps, their Tory Lord Chancellor, Molesworth reportedly made this remark on the defense of Phipps by Convocation: `` They that have turned the world upside down, are come hither also ''.

They have remained on the opened page of my mind in all the years which since have passed.

They, in effect, have compromised the opposing positions of the nineteenth century.

They, too, have links with the city's ills.

They opposed the Forand bill, which would have placed the major burden of financial support upon the individual himself through compulsory payroll deduction ; ;

They both measure literature by moral standards, and in their political writings both allow for censorship, but the differences between them are also significant.

They met with many difficulties and many adventures, and became involved in political intrigues, Antoine especially exercising such influence as he possessed in favour of France and the Roman Catholic missionaries.

They became a major political issue in the elections of 1798 and 1800.

They argued that a new type of political force was needed to challenge the Conservative Party.

They drew the attention of the authorities to the serious consequences of any political implications in raising the banners.

They seek to explain why certain beliefs about categories would appear in political science as ideology, in religion as dogma, or in science as theory.

They were also among the first in South East Asia to adopt religious ideas and political institutions from India and to establish centralized kingdoms surrounding large territories.

They have also hailed its control of the armed forces, it respect for civil liberties, its expansion of suffrage and participation, and its gradual admission of new contenders, especially reformers, to the political arena.

They warn that this development may not only fuel lone wolf terrorism but have devastating effects on American political life, such as the rise of a revolutionary right-wing populist movement capable of subverting the established political powers.

They developed in the socio-economic and political cleavages that existed during the first three decades of the 19th century, and had the support of the business, professional and established Church ( Anglican ) elites in Ontario and to a lesser extent in Quebec.

They were refuted in this claim by David J. Schneider, who wrote that " correlations between prejudice and political conservative are reduced virtually to zero when controls for SDO are instituted ".

( They were not the only sacrifices ; law-breakers of all classes or defeated political opponents were also acceptable as victims.

They are represented at various levels in the political system.

They further called for an increased application of the gospel to the sociological, political, and economic areas.

They are issued in response to questions by ordinary Muslims, and go unnoticed by those not concerned, while the much smaller number of fatwā issued on controversial subjects, such as war, jihad, and dhimmis ( particularly by extremist preachers ), sometimes get wide coverage in the media because of their political content ( see examples below ).

They are also used for non-artistic purposes, such as conferences, charity galas and political meetings.

They had combined both political and economic interests.

They were initially intended for Nazi collaborators, but then other categories of political prisoners ( for example, members of deported peoples who fled from exile ) were also sentenced to " katorga works ".

They also served as the principal financiers of the nation's innumerable revolutions, floating innumerable loans-at high interest rates-to competing political factions.

They deliberately avoided social, economic, and cultural topics because they might undermine the national political development which their writing celebrated.

They organized first into tribal units, and then combined into larger political structures.

They also prohibited usury and took a number of measures in favor of women's rights, by declaring equality of the sexes and introducing women to political life.

They imposed on the parts of Afghanistan under their control their political and judicial interpretation of Islam issuing edicts forbidding women to work outside the home, attend school, or to leave their homes unless accompanied by a male relative.

They also won 56 % of the two party preferred vote, which is still the greatest winning margin at a federal election in Australian political history.