Help


[permalink] [id link]
+
Page "Lagrange's four-square theorem" ¶ 6
from Wikipedia
Edit
Promote Demote Fragment Fix

Some Related Sentences

theorem and was
The axiom of choice was formulated in 1904 by Ernst Zermelo in order to formalize his proof of the well-ordering theorem.
Transmission, Gregory Chaitin also presents this theorem in J. ACM – Chaitin's paper was submitted October 1966 and revised in December 1968, and cites both Solomonoff's and Kolmogorov's papers.
Mordell's theorem had an ad hoc proof ; Weil began the separation of the infinite descent argument into two types of structural approach, by means of height functions for sizing rational points, and by means of Galois cohomology, which was not to be clearly named as that for two more decades.
His ' matrix divisor ' ( vector bundle avant la lettre ) Riemann – Roch theorem from 1938 was a very early anticipation of later ideas such as moduli spaces of bundles.
His first ( pre-IHÉS ) breakthrough in algebraic geometry was the Grothendieck – Hirzebruch – Riemann – Roch theorem, a far-reaching generalisation of the Hirzebruch – Riemann – Roch theorem proved algebraically ; in this context he also introduced K-theory.
The first major application was the relative version of Serre's theorem showing that the cohomology of a coherent sheaf on a complete variety is finite dimensional ; Grothendieck's theorem shows that the higher direct images of coherent sheaves under a proper map are coherent ; this reduces to Serre's theorem over a one-point space.
The Grothendieck – Riemann – Roch theorem was announced by Grothendieck at the initial Mathematische Arbeitstagung in Bonn, in 1957.
Argonne National Laboratory was a leader in automated theorem proving from the 1960s to the 2000s
Following Desargues ' thinking, the sixteen-year-old Pascal produced, as a means of proof, a short treatise on what was called the " Mystic Hexagram ", Essai pour les coniques (" Essay on Conics ") and sent it — his first serious work of mathematics — to Père Mersenne in Paris ; it is known still today as Pascal's theorem.
The Cook – Levin theorem states that the Boolean satisfiability problem is NP-complete, and in fact, this was the first decision problem proved to be NP-complete.
SAT was the first known NP-complete problem, as proved by Stephen Cook in 1971 ( see Cook's theorem for the proof ).
It was Pierre-Simon Laplace ( 1749 – 1827 ) who introduced a general version of the theorem and used it to approach problems in celestial mechanics, medical statistics, reliability, and jurisprudence.
In mathematics, a Gödel code was the basis for the proof of Gödel's incompleteness theorem.
An example of this phenomenon is Dirichlet's theorem, to which it was originally applied by Heine, that a continuous function on a compact interval is uniformly continuous: here continuity is a local property of the function, and uniform continuity the corresponding global property.
The full significance of Bolzano's theorem, and its method of proof, would not emerge until almost 50 years later when it was rediscovered by Karl Weierstrass.
The culmination of their investigations, the Arzelà – Ascoli theorem, was a generalization of the Bolzano – Weierstrass theorem to families of continuous functions, the precise conclusion of which was that it was possible to extract a uniformly convergent sequence of functions from a suitable family of functions.
The existence of problems within NP but outside both P and NP-complete, under that assumption, was established by NP-intermediate | Ladner's theorem.

theorem and proven
For a first order predicate calculus, with no (" proper ") axioms, Gödel's completeness theorem states that the theorems ( provable statements ) are exactly the logically valid well-formed formulas, so identifying valid formulas is recursively enumerable: given unbounded resources, any valid formula can eventually be proven.
* Catalan's conjecture, a theorem conjectured in 1844 and proven in 2002
* The Poincaré theorem ( proven by Grigori Perelman )
The five color theorem, which has a short elementary proof, states that five colors suffice to color a map and was proven in the late 19th century ; however, proving that four colors suffice turned out to be significantly harder.
The four color theorem was proven in 1976 by Kenneth Appel and Wolfgang Haken.
Additionally in 2005, the theorem was proven by Georges Gonthier with general purpose theorem proving software.
In 1976, while other teams of mathematicians were racing to complete proofs, Kenneth Appel and Wolfgang Haken at the University of Illinois announced that they had proven the theorem.
" At the same time the unusual nature of the proof — it was the first major theorem to be proven with extensive computer assistance — and the complexity of the human verifiable portion, aroused considerable controversy.
The first result in that direction is the prime number theorem, proven at the end of the 19th century, which says that the probability that a given, randomly chosen number is prime is inversely proportional to its number of digits, or the logarithm of n.
The theorem was conjectured by Euler and Legendre and first proven by Gauss.
Bell's theorem implies, and it has been proven mathematically, that compatible measurements cannot show Bell-like correlations, and thus entanglement is a fundamentally non-classical phenomenon.
In mathematics, a theorem is a statement that has been proven on the basis of previously established statements, such as other theorems, and previously accepted statements, such as axioms.
In order to be proven, a theorem must be expressible as a precise, formal statement.
In this example, the converse can be proven as another theorem, but this is often not the case.
On the other hand, Fermat's last theorem has always been known by that name, even before it was proven ; it was never known as " Fermat's conjecture ".
A proven " No-Go " theorem indicates this situation, called the Quintom scenario, requires at least two degrees of freedom for dark energy models.
This theorem was proven independently by Leonid Levin in the Soviet Union, and has thus been given the name the Cook-Levin theorem.
This conjecture can be justified ( but not proven ) by assuming that 1 / ln t describes the density function of the prime distribution, an assumption suggested by the prime number theorem.
He also claims to have proven a derivation of Bayes ' theorem from the concept of fuzzy subsethood.
For sufficiently nice prior probabilities, the Bernstein-von Mises theorem gives that in the limit of infinite trials and the posterior converges to a Gaussian distribution independent of the initial prior under some conditions firstly outlined and rigorously proven by Joseph Leo Doob in 1948, namely if the random variable in consideration has a finite probability space.
In Euclidean geometry, for right triangles it is a consequence of the Pythagorean theorem, and for general triangles a consequence of the law of cosines, although it may be proven without these theorems.
Notice that although we don't know if NP is equal to P or not, we do know that EXPTIME-complete problems are not in P ; it has been proven that these problems cannot be solved in polynomial time, by the time hierarchy theorem.
While the ideal structure of becomes considerably more complex as n increases, the rings in question still remain Noetherian, and any theorem about that can be proven using only the fact that is Noetherian, can be proven for.

theorem and by
This reduction has been accomplished by the general methods of linear algebra, i.e., by the primary decomposition theorem.
The latter theorem has been generalized by Yamabe and Yujobo, and Cairns to show that in Af there are families of such cubes.
However, that particular case is a theorem of Zermelo – Fraenkel set theory without the axiom of choice ( ZF ); it is easily proved by mathematical induction.
Assuming ZF is consistent, Kurt Gödel showed that the negation of the axiom of choice is not a theorem of ZF by constructing an inner model ( the constructible universe ) which satisfies ZFC and thus showing that ZFC is consistent.
Assuming ZF is consistent, Paul Cohen employed the technique of forcing, developed for this purpose, to show that the axiom of choice itself is not a theorem of ZF by constructing a much more complex model which satisfies ZF ¬ C ( ZF with the negation of AC added as axiom ) and thus showing that ZF ¬ C is consistent.
The concept and theory of Kolmogorov Complexity is based on a crucial theorem first discovered by Ray Solomonoff, who published it in 1960, describing it in " A Preliminary Report on a General Theory of Inductive Inference " as part of his invention of algorithmic probability.
* Automated theorem proving, the proving of mathematical theorems by a computer program
He stopped by his local library where he found a book about the theorem .< ref >
In 1956, he applied the same thinking to the Riemann – Roch theorem, which had already recently been generalized to any dimension by Hirzebruch.
Automated theorem proving ( also known as ATP or automated deduction ) is the proving of mathematical theorems by a computer program.
In 1920, Thoralf Skolem simplified a previous result by Leopold Löwenheim, leading to the Löwenheim – Skolem theorem and, in 1930, to the notion of a Herbrand universe and a Herbrand interpretation that allowed ( un ) satisfiability of first-order formulas ( and hence the validity of a theorem ) to be reduced to ( potentially infinitely many ) propositional satisfiability problems.
* Metamath-a language for developing strictly formalized mathematical definitions and proofs accompanied by a proof checker for this language and a growing database of thousands of proved theorems ; while the Metamath language is not accompanied with an automated theorem prover, it can be regarded as important because the formal language behind it allows development of such a software ; as of March, 2012, there is no " widely " known such software, so it is not a subject of " automated theorem proving " ( it can become such a subject ), but it is a proof assistant.
Artin's theorem states that in an alternative algebra the subalgebra generated by any two elements is associative.
A generalization of Artin's theorem states that whenever three elements in an alternative algebra associate ( i. e. ) the subalgebra generated by those elements is associative.
A corollary of Artin's theorem is that alternative algebras are power-associative, that is, the subalgebra generated by a single element is associative.
Using the above theorem it is easy to see that the original Borsuk Ulam statement is correct since if we take a map f: S < sup > n </ sup > → ℝ < sup > n </ sup > that does not equalize on any antipodes then we can construct a map g: S < sup > n </ sup > → S < sup > n-1 </ sup > by the formula
* The Lusternik – Schnirelmann theorem: If the sphere S < sup > n </ sup > is covered by n + 1 open sets, then one of these sets contains a pair ( x, − x ) of antipodal points.
* The case n = 1 can be illustrated by the claim that there always exist a pair of opposite points on the earth's equator with the same temperature, this can be shown to be true much more easily using the intermediate value theorem.

0.306 seconds.