Faith does not involve a search by natural reason to prove what is believed.

In both " JLA " and " 52 ," Grant Morrison states that Luthor's ego leads him to believe that the only reason Superman commits good deeds is to somehow strike at Luthor and prove who is better, arguing that it is impossible for Superman to be as good as he appears to be.

His scepticism to which his ontological parsimony request leads appears in his doctrine that human reason can prove neither the immortality of the soul nor the existence, unity, and infinity of God.

Podkayne suspects the reason behind her brother's behavior, but cannot prove it.

Market definition is necessary, in rule of reason cases, for the plaintiff to prove a conspiracy is harmful.

For a simple example, if for some reason we had any doubt that the roots 1 and 2 in the above example were distinct, then we might prove this by noting that 1 is an odd number while 2 is even.

The TAG is a transcendental argument that attempts to prove that God is the precondition of all human knowledge and experience, by demonstrating the impossibility of the contrary ; in other words, that logic, reason, or morality cannot exist without God.

While that had proven a fatal assumption with Vicious ( Lydon cites Sid's musical inability as a prime reason for the Pistols ' break-up ), Wobble would prove to be a natural talent.

McAleese's very approval ratings were widely seen as the reason for her re-election, with no opposition party willing to bear the cost ( financial or political ) of competing in an election that would prove difficult to win.

Whatever the reason, Andersen thought the change would prove more satirical.

Theologians usually use reason and deduction to prove the existence, unity and oneness of God.

According to Peter Harvey, One uses ' not-Self ', then, as a reason to let go of things, not to ' prove ' that there is no Self.

Whatever the reason for this later change to the offensive, it was to prove fatal for the Japanese in Burma.

An innocent party wishing to set aside a contract for duress to the person need to prove only that the threat was made and that it was a reason for entry into the contract ; the onus of proof then shifts to the other party to prove that the threat had no effect in causing the party to enter into the contract.

The reason is partly technical ( it is difficult to construct and prove universal generalizations about criticism as a human behaviour ) and partly practical ( it is more useful to understand particular behaviours which are of direct practical concern ).

In 1904 William Henry Stevenson analysed possible sites and said " So far, there is nothing to prove the identity of this Eðandune named in the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle with Edington " but then goes on to say that " there can be little reason for questioning it ".

The characteristic class approach to curvature invariants was a particular reason to make a theory, to prove a general Gauss-Bonnet theorem.

So for this reason, relations of ideas cannot be used to prove matters of fact.

In support of this, Kershaw cites the example of the massacre of 1, 160 Jewish men at Luzk on July 3, 1941, none of whom were Communist Party members, and all of whom were shot for no other reason than, as the " Einsatzkommando " leader reported to Berlin, to prove to the local Jewish community who were the Herrnvolk ( master race ) and who were not.

* This inertia of the gas is also the reason why on a hydropneumatic Citroën the driver will many times not even realise the event of a blown tyre — if not for the added noise — which can cause dynamic unrest and prove fatal on a steel-sprung car.

Cattle, horses and other livestock are commonly branded today for the same reason they were in Ancient times, to prove ownership.

The only reason I want to be there is to get the pictures and prove that the US is not what they think.

Van Til summarized the main drive of his apologetic by reason of circular logic, saying: "( T ) he only proof for the existence of God is that without God you couldn't prove anything.

Adopting this Neoplatonic idea of God as the one who can only be felt by the longing soul, but not grasped by the reason, Bahya finds it superfluous to prove the incorporeality of God.

In most US states, the employer must prove this case based on preponderance of the evidence.

To prove the bona fide occupational qualifications defense, an employer must prove three elements: a direct relationship between sex and the ability to perform the duties of the job, the BFOQ relates to the " essence " or " central mission of the employer's business ," and there is no less-restrictive or reasonable alternative ( United Automobile Workers v. Johnson Controls, Inc., 111 S. Ct.

These acts simply permitted injured employees to sue the employer and then prove a negligent act or omission.

Though the employee must prove that the employer was negligent in causing his or her injuries, the employer loses its common law defenses of contributory negligence, assumption of the risk, and the fellow employee doctrine.

" In order to establish a constructive discharge, an employee must plead and prove, by the usual preponderance of the evidence standard, that the employer either intentionally created or knowingly permitted working conditions that were so intolerable or aggravated at the time of the employee's resignation that a reasonable employer would realize that a reasonable person in the employee's position would be compelled to resign.

In the years since Griggs, courts have defined " business necessity " as requiring the employer to prove that whatever is causing the racial disparity — be it a test, an educational requirement, or another hiring practice — has a demonstrable factual relationship to making the company more profitable.

Trade union effectiveness in securing decent collective agreements and to protect workers are restricted because Unions must obtain recognition from the employer after it can prove by secret ballot that the majority of the eligible employees are its members.

" If an employer can prove that a pay differential exists because of one of these factors, there is no liability.

If the employer pleads a potentially fair reason, the burden is on him to prove it.

If the employee proves that there could have been a competing reason then the burden shifts back to the employer to prove that their alleged reason was the main one.

For incompetence, the employer must normally give a warning and time to improve unless it can prove the employee already knew what was required.

If the employee has long service with no complaints or has just had a good appraisal it will take a while for the employer to prove it has given a fair chance of improvement or it may be impossible to prove incompetence.

Suspicion of a crime is an example of where the employer need only prove it believed guilt as opposed to the employee being found guilty, although an investigation is still needed, even if the crime is against the discplinary code, but not until before termination-it can be after notice of dismissal.

An employer can be entitled to dismiss multiple employees where it cannot prove who is guilty or to dismiss only some of those guilty based on blameworthiness.

For capability or conduct, the employer does not have to prove on the balance of probabilities that the employee is incompetent or badly behaved, merely that based on sufficient evidence it honestly believes on reasonable grounds that he is.

* Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins,, which held that the burden of proof shifted, once an employee had proved that an unlawful consideration had played a part in the employer's personnel decision, to the employer to prove that it would have made the same decision if it had not been motivated by that unlawful factor, but that such proof by the employer would constitute a complete defense for the employer.

In a distress termination, where the plan does not have enough money to pay all benefits, the employer must prove severe financial distress-for instance the likelihood that continuing the plan would force the company to shut down.

Typically, an employer must prove just cause before an arbitrator to sustain an employee's termination, suspension, or other discipline.