His death causes Paul to ask himself, " What use is it to him now that he was such a good mathematician in school?

* What does it mean to say that one thing causes another?

Marianne LaFrance, the former chair of the Larry Kramer Initiative for Lesbian and Gay Studies at Yale University, says, " Now we're asking not just ' What causes homosexuality?

' also ' What causes heterosexuality?

What often causes confusion is the large amount of evidence of widespread lead poisoning, particularly amongst those who would have had easy access to piped water.

# What causes some people to be attracted to their own sex?

# What causes discrimination against people with a homosexual orientation and how can this be influenced?

A urethral stricture is a narrowing of the urethra < ref name =" titleUrethral stricture: What causes it?

# What are the other harmful factors that have equal or better claim to be called " root causes?

What causes the passage to be so shocking, indeed, is the power of sustaining over such a long phrase what we expect as a brief explosion.

* RH Disease, What causes Rhesus Disease.

What are the causes and consequences of this lack of agreement?

What will is it that causes this heart to beat?

* What is death by natural causes?

Moritz Grosse-Wentrup and Bernhard Schölkopf, from the Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems in Germany, with their project " What are the neuro-physiological causes of performance variations in brain-computer interfacing?

" " What causes the seasons?

:*" What we call little things are merely the causes of great things ; they are the beginning, the embryo, and it is the point of departure which, generally speaking, decides the whole future of an existence.

The famous question that drove his inquiry into the anthropology of the gift was: " What power resides in the object given that causes its recipient to pay it back?

* What causes heiligenschein

" Mack frequently would interrupt Moran's description of something with a drawling " What causes that?

* What causes thundersnow?

He wrote: " When normals and stigmatized do in fact enter one another's immediate presence, especially when they attempt to maintain a joint conversational encounter, there occurs one of the primal scenes of sociology ; for, in many cases, these moments will be the ones when the causes and effects of stigma will be directly confronted by both sides .... " What are unthinking routines for normals can become management problems for the discreditable .... The person with a secret failing, then, must be alive to the social situation as a scanner of possibilities, and is therefore likely to be alienated from the simpler world in which those around them apparently dwell.

What is clear is that there are various causes of colicky babies other than the obvious gassy causes:

" from the show Garfield and Friends shows a variation of the " Who's on First " routine, with three dogs hired as farmhands named Who, What, and Where causing similar confusion among the main characters ( especially Roy Rooster ).

In the credits, Burton is credited as playing " Tony ," as opposed to " Duke " ( perhaps to avoid confusion with the George Washington Duke character ) Rocky V is the second time in the series to do so, with the first being Rocky II as Apollo asked " What are you afraid of, Tony?

What may add to the confusion is that the word snuff may also refer to dipping tobacco ( also known as moist snuff, which may confuse even more ), which is applied to the lower lip and the gums rather than inhaled or placed under the upper lip.

What Rous argued was that " when a person or persons have gotten Supreme Power, and by the same excluded all other from authority, either that authority which is thus taken by power must be obeyed, or else all authority and government must fall to the ground ; and so confusion ( which is worse than titular tyranny ) be admitted into a Commonwealth " ( Rous, Lawfulnes, pp. 7 – 8 ).

What this means is that a significant tradition in the study of syntax and grammar has been incapable from the start of acknowledging the endo-vs. exocentric distinction, a fact that has generated confusion about what should count as an endo-or exocentric structure.

What little is known about him comes from 8th-century writer Bede, but inconsistencies between various works have led to confusion about the exact circumstances of Wighard's election and whether he was ever confirmed in that office.

`` What is it you want me to do, Mr. Brenner ''??

What is the gunk ''??

`` Oh, it's that myth, about Orpheus and What is her name??

`` What is the scaffolding for, Brassnose ''??

`` What is your name, boy??

`` What is with this vow jazz ''??

What appears here is shorter than what he actually said but very close to his own words.

`` What is more true than anything else??

What is the history of criticism but the history of men attempting to make sense of the manifold elements in art that will not allow themselves to be reduced to a single philosophy or a single aesthetic theory??

What they are after is the beatific vision.

What they discuss with dialectical seriousness is the degree to which sex can inspire the Muse.

What one actually remembers is its greenness.

What Hume calls `` sensation '' is what Whitehead calls `` perception in the mode of presentational immediacy '' which is a sophisticated abstraction from perception in the mode of causal efficacy.

What he really wants is to find `` a sacred cause '' to which he can honestly devote himself.

What was only a vague suspicion in the case of Sherlock Holmes now appears as a direct accusation: the private eye is in danger of turning into his opposite.

For example, suppose a man wearing a $200 watch, driving a 1959 Rolls Royce, stops to ask a man on the sidewalk, `` What time is it ''??

What I am here to do is to report on the gyrations of the struggle -- a struggle that amounts to self-redefinition -- to see if we can predict its future course.

What I want to point out here is that all of them are ex-liberals, or modified liberals, with perhaps one exception.

What is the common man's complaint??

What is simply an opinion formed in defiance of the laws of human probability, whether or not it is later confirmed, has become by September of the election year `` a firm conviction ''.

What is more, the legends have become so sacrosanct that the very habit of self-examination or self-criticism smells of low treason, and men who practice it are defeatists and unpatriotic scoundrels.

`` What I'd like you to comment on is the criticism leveled at your Committee ''.

What is the probable course of future developments??