What else he said was lost in the rattle of gunfire on all sides.

`` What else would I mean, anyways ''??

`` What else ''??

`` What is more true than anything else??

`` What else could I do??

Concerning the sentence the editor asked, `` What else can Virginia do than to hang the men who have defied her laws, organized treason, and butchered her citizens ''.

`` What else ''??

What else was there to say??

What else did Eddie have to say ''??

Joachim Fest writes: " What he seemed to fear more than anything else was a death devoid of dramatic effects.

What every thing is really worth to the man who has acquired it, and who wants to dispose of it or exchange it for something else, is the toil and trouble which it can save to himself, and which it can impose upon other people.

What is going on affects me the same as everyone else.

What the anti-relativists -- self-declared -- want us to worry about, and worry about and worry about, as though our very souls depended on it, is a kind of spiritual entropy, a heat death of the mind, in which everything is as significant, and thus as insignificant, as everything else: anything goes, to each his own, you pays your money and you takes your choice, I know what I like, not in the couth, tout comprendre, c ' est tout pardonner.

What else may have motivated him, is open to speculation.

Like, " What else would you expect him to do but to go off and be a nerd?

And then Schmidt declared the fusion: " What else do we need to our clubs become one ?".

" What else could it mean to assert that there is no such thing as nature ?".

" Corot responded: " What there is to see in painting, or rather what I am looking for, is the form, the whole, the value of the tones … That is why for me the color comes after, because I love more than anything else the overall effect, the harmony of the tones, while color gives you a kind of shock that I don ’ t like.

Her first words were, ' What else did you record?

" Afterward, I felt, ' What else could I have done?

What is apparent is that he ( and everybody else at the time ) greatly underestimated the potential of his original device, imagining it to be limited to mostly military applications.

He is quoted as saying, " What I had reacted to was not only her physical appearance, but also her values and world view, her stinginess, her total selfishness, her lack of love for anyone else in the world – even her own husband and children – her narcissism, her Negro prejudice, her exploitation of everyone, her assumption that anyone was wrong who disagreed with her, her lack of friends, her sloppiness and dirtiness ..." He also grew up with few friends other than his cousin Will, and as a result "... grew up in libraries and among books.

The inclusion of the gnomes was the photographer's idea, in fact, but the symbolism was quite deliberate, according to Feinsten: " What else could it be?

What else will perform the desired function?

`` What is it you want me to do, Mr. Brenner ''??

What is the gunk ''??

`` Oh, it's that myth, about Orpheus and What is her name??

`` What is the scaffolding for, Brassnose ''??

`` What is your name, boy??

`` What is with this vow jazz ''??

What appears here is shorter than what he actually said but very close to his own words.

What is the history of criticism but the history of men attempting to make sense of the manifold elements in art that will not allow themselves to be reduced to a single philosophy or a single aesthetic theory??

What they are after is the beatific vision.

What they discuss with dialectical seriousness is the degree to which sex can inspire the Muse.

What one actually remembers is its greenness.

What Hume calls `` sensation '' is what Whitehead calls `` perception in the mode of presentational immediacy '' which is a sophisticated abstraction from perception in the mode of causal efficacy.

What he really wants is to find `` a sacred cause '' to which he can honestly devote himself.

What was only a vague suspicion in the case of Sherlock Holmes now appears as a direct accusation: the private eye is in danger of turning into his opposite.

For example, suppose a man wearing a $200 watch, driving a 1959 Rolls Royce, stops to ask a man on the sidewalk, `` What time is it ''??

What I am here to do is to report on the gyrations of the struggle -- a struggle that amounts to self-redefinition -- to see if we can predict its future course.

What I want to point out here is that all of them are ex-liberals, or modified liberals, with perhaps one exception.

What is the common man's complaint??

What is simply an opinion formed in defiance of the laws of human probability, whether or not it is later confirmed, has become by September of the election year `` a firm conviction ''.

What is more, the legends have become so sacrosanct that the very habit of self-examination or self-criticism smells of low treason, and men who practice it are defeatists and unpatriotic scoundrels.

`` What I'd like you to comment on is the criticism leveled at your Committee ''.

What is the probable course of future developments??