`` What is it you want me to do, Mr. Brenner ''??

What is the gunk ''??

`` Oh, it's that myth, about Orpheus and What is her name??

`` What is the scaffolding for, Brassnose ''??

`` What is your name, boy??

`` What is with this vow jazz ''??

What appears here is shorter than what he actually said but very close to his own words.

`` What is more true than anything else??

What is the history of criticism but the history of men attempting to make sense of the manifold elements in art that will not allow themselves to be reduced to a single philosophy or a single aesthetic theory??

What they are after is the beatific vision.

What they discuss with dialectical seriousness is the degree to which sex can inspire the Muse.

What one actually remembers is its greenness.

What Hume calls `` sensation '' is what Whitehead calls `` perception in the mode of presentational immediacy '' which is a sophisticated abstraction from perception in the mode of causal efficacy.

What he really wants is to find `` a sacred cause '' to which he can honestly devote himself.

What was only a vague suspicion in the case of Sherlock Holmes now appears as a direct accusation: the private eye is in danger of turning into his opposite.

For example, suppose a man wearing a $200 watch, driving a 1959 Rolls Royce, stops to ask a man on the sidewalk, `` What time is it ''??

What I am here to do is to report on the gyrations of the struggle -- a struggle that amounts to self-redefinition -- to see if we can predict its future course.

What I want to point out here is that all of them are ex-liberals, or modified liberals, with perhaps one exception.

What is the common man's complaint??

What is simply an opinion formed in defiance of the laws of human probability, whether or not it is later confirmed, has become by September of the election year `` a firm conviction ''.

What is more, the legends have become so sacrosanct that the very habit of self-examination or self-criticism smells of low treason, and men who practice it are defeatists and unpatriotic scoundrels.

`` What I'd like you to comment on is the criticism leveled at your Committee ''.

What is the probable course of future developments??

Finally Luis Hernandez said, `` What must be, must be.

What these fragments are and how they activate the go order may not be revealed.

`` What I am saying does not mean that there will henceforth be no form in art.

What will be the final symmetry of the good society??

What shall these effects be??

What I want is to have this evidence come before Congress and if the Attorney General does not report it, as I am very sure he won't, as he has refused to do anything of the kind, I then wish that a committee of seven Representatives be appointed with power to take the evidence.

Those famous lines of the Greek Anthology with which a fading beauty dedicates her mirror at the shrine of a goddess reveal a wise attitude: `` Venus, take my votive glass, Since I am not what I was, What from this day I shall be, Venus, let me never see ''.

What better affirmative step could be taken to this end than repeal of the Connally amendment -- an act which could expose the United States to no practical risk yet would put an end to our self-judging attitude toward the court, enable us to utilize it, and advance in a tangible way the cause of international law and order??

What was missing in the Governor's argument, as in so many similar arguments, was a premise which would enable one to make the ethical leap from what might be militarily desirable to what is right.

What evidence is there of an objective kind that in fact your government proposes to do just that, and that it can be done ''??

What we will be sacrificing in any such arrangement will be our power to be selective which is contained in the reciprocal trade principle under which we now operate.

`` What will be the subject ''??

`` What room is there going to be in an apartment for any child ''??

`` What possessed you to tell me a clotheshorse would be a good idea ''??

What the next move will be only time, of course, will tell.

What would the first projects be??

What targets still remain to be hit??

What may be acceptable in one state may be strictly prohibited across the boundary line.

What can be done for the `` individual contributor '' who is extremely important -- and likely to be more so -- in the operation of the technically oriented company??