Therefore each binomial trial can be thought of as producing a value of a random variable associated with that trial and taking the values 0 and 1, with probabilities Q and P respectively.

The photocathode sensitivities S, phosphor efficiencies P, and anode potentials V of the individual stages shall be distinguished by means of subscripts 1, and 2, in the text, where required.

* If the balance factor of L is + 1, a single right rotation ( with P as the root ) is needed ( Left-Left case ).

For example, P might be the circle with radius 1 and center ( 0, 0 ): P =

The running time of the new computation will be the length of time the unimproved fraction takes ( which is 1 − P ), plus the length of time the improved fraction takes.

In the case of parallelization, Amdahl's law states that if P is the proportion of a program that can be made parallel ( i. e., benefit from parallelization ), and ( 1 − P ) is the proportion that cannot be parallelized ( remains serial ), then the maximum speedup that can be achieved by using N processors is

In the limit, as N tends to infinity, the maximum speedup tends to 1 / ( 1 − P ).

In practice, performance to price ratio falls rapidly as N is increased once there is even a small component of ( 1 − P ).

As an example, if P is 90 %, then ( 1 − P ) is 10 %, and the problem can be sped up by a maximum of a factor of 10, no matter how large the value of N used.

A great part of the craft of parallel programming consists of attempting to reduce the component ( 1 – P ) to the smallest possible value.

Illustrative is the hydration of phenylacetylene gives acetophenone, and the ( Ph < sub > 3 </ sub > P ) AuCH < sub > 3 </ sub >- catalyzed hydration of 1, 8-nonadiyne to 2, 8-nonanedione:

Alcohol sales are prohibited on Sunday in West Virginia until 1: 00 P. M. EST.

The resultant ciphertext replaces P < sub > 1 </ sub > and P < sub > 2 </ sub >.

Additionally, though the Chronicler's principal source is the Deuteronomistic History, coming primarily, as stated above, from the books of 2 Samuel and 1 – 2 Kings and other public records and sources ( see above ), the Chronicler also uses other biblical sources, particularly from the Pentateuch, as redacted and put together by P ( the Priestly Source ).

Given points P < sub > 0 </ sub > and P < sub > 1 </ sub >, a linear Bézier curve is simply a straight line between those two points.

A quadratic Bézier curve is the path traced by the function B ( t ), given points P < sub > 0 </ sub >, P < sub > 1 </ sub >, and P < sub > 2 </ sub >,

which can be interpreted as the linear interpolant of corresponding points on the linear Bézier curves from P < sub > 0 </ sub > to P < sub > 1 </ sub > and from P < sub > 1 </ sub > to P < sub > 2 </ sub > respectively.

For each element a of a group G, conjugation by a is the operation φ < sub > a </ sub >: G → G given by ( or a < sup >− 1 </ sup > ga ; usage varies ).

: p ( N )/ N → 1 as N → ∞

: R < sub > 1 </ sub >- CH = CH-R < sub > 2 </ sub > + O < sub > 3 </ sub > → R < sub > 1 </ sub >- CHO + R < sub > 2 </ sub >- CHO + H < sub > 2 </ sub > O

* Historical Situation → The historical situation goes through three stages: in chapters 1 – 39 the prophet speaks of a judgment which will befall the wicked Israelites ; in chapters 40 – 55 the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple ( 587 BCE ) is treated as an accomplished fact and the fall of Babylon as an imminent threat ; and in chapters 56 – 66 the fall of Babylon is already in the past.

: X + C → XC ( 1 )

The systematic name for sucrose, O-α-D-glucopyranosyl -( 1 → 2 )- D-fructofuranoside, indicates four things:

The systematic name for lactose is O-β-D-galactopyranosyl -( 1 → 4 )- D-glucopyranose.

This is because we arrange things such that for every integer, there is a distinct odd integer: ... − 2 → − 3, − 1 → − 1, 0 → 1, 1 → 3, 2 → 5, ...; or, more generally, n → 2n + 1.

1 kg • m / s²

* Scanning: If a is the next symbol in the input stream, for every state in S ( k ) of the form ( X → α • a β, j ), add ( X → α a • β, j ) to S ( k + 1 ).

( 2 ) S → • S + M ( 0 ) # predict from ( 1 )

( 3 ) S → • M ( 0 ) # predict from ( 1 )

( 1 ) T → number • ( 0 ) # scan from S ( 0 )( 6 )

( 2 ) M → T • ( 0 ) # complete from ( 1 ) and S ( 0 )( 5 )

( 6 ) P → S • ( 0 ) # complete from ( 4 ) and S ( 0 )( 1 )

( 1 ) S → S + • M ( 0 ) # scan from S ( 1 )( 5 )

( 2 ) M → • M * T ( 2 ) # predict from ( 1 )

( 3 ) M → • T ( 2 ) # predict from ( 1 )

( 1 ) T → number • ( 2 ) # scan from S ( 2 )( 4 )

( 2 ) M → T • ( 2 ) # complete from ( 1 ) and S ( 2 )( 3 )

( 4 ) S → S + M • ( 0 ) # complete from ( 2 ) and S ( 2 )( 1 )

( 6 ) P → S • ( 0 ) # complete from ( 4 ) and S ( 0 )( 1 )

( 1 ) M → M * • T ( 2 ) # scan from S ( 3 )( 3 )

( 2 ) T → • number ( 4 ) # predict from ( 1 )

( 1 ) T → number • ( 4 ) # scan from S ( 4 )( 2 )

( 2 ) M → M * T • ( 2 ) # complete from ( 1 ) and S ( 4 )( 1 )

( 4 ) S → S + M • ( 0 ) # complete from ( 2 ) and S ( 2 )( 1 )

( 6 ) P → S • ( 0 ) # complete from ( 4 ) and S ( 0 )( 1 )

( T3 ) ~ ( ψ • G ψ ) ( n ) 1, PC