[permalink] [id link]
Cārvāka emerged as an alternative to the orthodox Hindu pro-Vedic Āstika schools, as well as a philosophical predecessor to subsequent or contemporaneous nāstika philosophies such as Ājīvika, Jainism and Buddhism ( the latter two later spinning off into what may be described today as separate religions ) in the classical period of Indian philosophy.
from
Wikipedia
Some Related Sentences
Cārvāka and orthodox
While the early nāstika systems such as Cārvāka and Ājīvika gradually became extinct or evolved into others, the Jain and Buddhist traditions spun off into what may be described today as separate religions, distinct from Hinduism ( which is now restrictively meant to encompass only the six orthodox Āstika philosophical systems ).
Cārvāka and Hindu
Also known as Lokāyata, it is a system of Hindu philosophy that assumes various forms of philosophical skepticism and religious indifference. It is named after its founder, Cārvāka, author of the Bārhaspatya-sūtras.
See Also: Hinduism -- Hindu scripture -- Samkhya -- Yoga -- Nyaya -- Vaisesika -- Vedanta -- Bhakti -- Cārvāka -- Indian logic
Indeed, the title character of the sixth century Tamil Buddhist epic Manimekalai is advised at one point to study the various Hindu schools of philosophy, such as Sankhya and Vaisheshika as well as Buddhism, Ajivika, Cārvāka, and Jainism.
Ājīvika is thought to be contemporaneous to other early Hindu nāstika philosophical schools of thought, such as Cārvāka, Jainism and Buddhism, and may have preceded the latter two systems.
Cārvāka and schools
As opposed to other schools, the first principle of Cārvāka philosophy was the rejection of inference as a means to establish metaphysical truths.
Although materialist schools existed before Cārvāka, it was the only school which systematized materialist philosophy by setting them down in the form of aphorisms in the 6th century.
Chatterjee and Datta explain that our understanding of Cārvāka philosophy is fragmentary, based largely on criticism of its ideas by other schools, and that it is not a living tradition:
By this definition, Nyāyá, Vaiśeṣika, Sāṃkhya, Yoga, Mimāṃsā and Vedānta are classified as āstika schools ; and some schools like Cārvāka, Ājīvika, Jainism and Buddhism are considered nāstika.
Cārvāka and philosophical
500 BC came to mean " skepticism " in general without yet being organized as a philosophical school, and that the name of a villain in the epic Mahabharata, Cārvāka, was attached to the position in order to disparage it.
The thoroughly materialistic and anti-religious philosophical Cārvāka school that originated in India with the Bārhaspatya-sūtras ( final centuries BCE ) is probably the most explicitly atheist school of philosophy in the region.
Cārvāka and contemporaneous
E. W. Hopkins, in his The Ethics of India ( 1924 ) claims that Cārvāka philosophy was contemporaneous to Jainism and Buddhism, mentioning " the old Cārvāka or materialist of the 6th century BC ".
Cārvāka and philosophies
When Madhavacharya compiled Sarva-darśana-samgraha ( a digest of all philosophies ) in the 14th century, he had no Cārvāka / Lokāyata text to quote from, or even refer to.
Unlike many of the Indian philosophies of the time, Cārvāka did not believe in austerities or rejecting pleasure out of fear of pain and held such reasoning to be foolish.
Cārvāka and Jainism
Cārvāka and be
The Cārvāka school thus appears to have gradually grown out of generic skepticism in the Mauryan period, but its existence as an organized body cannot be ascertained for times predating the 6th century.
Buddhist philosophers reasoned that the Cārvāka proposition, that inference could not be used as a form of evidence ( Pramana ), was absurd.
No independent works on Cārvāka philosophy can be found except for a few sūtras composed by Brihaspati.
Whatever is written on Cārvāka post this is based on second-hand knowledge, learned from preceptors to disciples and no independent works on Cārvāka philosophy can be found.
These refutations are sources of Cārvāka philosophy since, they continued to be made even after all the authentic Cārvāka / Lokāyata texts had been lost.
However, the representation of the Cārvāka thought in these works is not always firmly grounded in first hand knowledge of Cārvāka texts and should be viewed critically.
Cārvāka deemed Vedas to be tainted by the three faults of untruth, self-contradiction, and tautology.
Cārvāka held the view that Invariable Concomitance ( vyāpti ), a theory of Indian logic which refers to the relation between middle term and major term freed from all conditions, could not be ascertained.
Cārvāka and period
Cārvāka and Indian
Cārvāka was an Indian hedonist school of thought that arose approximately 600 BCE, and died out in the 14th century CE.
In Ancient Indian philosophy, materialism developed around 600 BC with the works of Ajita Kesakambali, Payasi, Kanada, and the proponents of the Cārvāka school of philosophy.
Cārvāka Fragments: A New Collection, Journal of Indian Philosophy, Volume 30, Number 6, December 2002, pp. 597 – 640.
Cārvāka and philosophy
Adherents of the heterodox Cārvāka or Lokāyata philosophy of India hold that this world is made of four elements only.
The basic tenets of Cārvāka philosophy, of no soul and existence of four ( not five ) elements were probably inspired from him.
Cārvāka was a living philosophy up to the 12th century AD after which this system seems to have disappeared without leaving any trace.
One of the most important references to the Cārvāka philosophy is the Sarva-darśana-saṅgraha ( etymologically all-philosophy-collection ), a famous work of 14th century Advaita Vedanta philosopher Mādhava Vidyāraṇya from South India, which starts with a chapter on the Cārvāka system.
0.168 seconds.