Help


[permalink] [id link]
+
Page "Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media" ¶ 1
from Wikipedia
Edit
Promote Demote Fragment Fix

Some Related Sentences

Chomsky and has
Jane Jacobs described it as a natural consequence of collusion between those managing power and trade, while Noam Chomsky has argued that the word " crony " is superfluous when describing capitalism.
Others such as Michael Johnston and Noam Chomsky assert that classical liberalism as such can no longer exist in a modern day context as its principles were only relevant at the time its founding thinkers conceptualised them ; and that classical liberalism has grown into two divergent philosophies since the beginning of the twentieth century: social liberalism and market liberalism.
The main proponent of such a theory is Noam Chomsky, the originator of the generative theory of grammar, who has defined language as a particular set of sentences that can be generated from a particular set of rules.
Chomsky also states that since the concept of matter may be affected by new scientific discoveries, as has happened in the past, scientific materialists are being dogmatic in assuming the opposite.
According to Noam Chomsky, any property can be considered material, if one defines matter such that it has that property.
Based on the extent to which the application of neoliberal policies has contributed to income disparities and inequality, both Klein and Noam Chomsky have suggested that the primary role of neoliberalism was as an ideological cover for capital accumulation by multinational corporations.
De Icaza is critical of the actions of the state of Israel towards the Palestinians in the Middle East and has blogged about Israel being a " terrorist state ," echoing the same statements made by Noam Chomsky.
For example, philosopher Noam Chomsky has argued that postmodernism is meaningless because it adds nothing to analytical or empirical knowledge.
Jeffrey A. Sluka has described Noam Chomsky and Edward S. Herman as pioneers in academic studies about state terrorism.
Chomsky has speculated that UG might be extremely simple and abstract, for example only a mechanism for combining symbols in a particular way, which he calls Merge.
Critics such as Howard Zinn and Noam Chomsky argue that the United States has sought, or has found itself forced into, a quasi-imperialist role by its status as the world's sole superpower.
Lakoff's claim that Chomsky asserts independence between syntax and semantics has been rejected by Chomsky, who has given examples from within his work where he talks about the relationship between his semantics and syntax.
Chomsky goes further and claims that Lakoff has " virtually no comprehension of the work he is discussing " ( the work in question being Chomsky's ).
Noam Chomsky has criticized the concept of the clash of civilizations as just being a new justification for the United States " for any atrocities that they wanted to carry out ," which was required after the Cold War as the Soviet Union was no longer a viable threat.
In 1957, Noam Chomsky published Syntactic Structures, in which he developed the idea that each sentence in a language has two levels of representation — a deep structure and a surface structure.
For Chomsky, the nature of such mental representations is largely innate, so if a grammatical theory has explanatory adequacy it must be able to explain the various grammatical nuances of the languages of the world as relatively minor variations in the universal pattern of human language.
Zinn's longtime publisher, Beacon Press, published what has come to be known as the Senator Mike Gravel edition of The Pentagon Papers, four volumes plus a fifth volume with analysis by Chomsky and Zinn.
* Noam Chomsky said of Pilger: " John Pilger's work has been a beacon of light in often dark times.
The field of linguistics and psycholinguistics since then has been defined by reactions to Chomsky, pro and con.
Noam Chomsky has argued that forces opposing the development of such a world conscience include free market ideologies that valorise corporate greed in nominal electoral democracies where advertising, shopping malls and indebtedness, shape citizens into apathetic consumers in relation to information and access necessary for democratic participation.

Chomsky and said
In formal language theory, a context-free grammar is said to be in Chomsky normal form if all of its production rules are of the form:
Chomsky said in an interview,
Herman and Chomsky have said that the media " is not a solid monolith " but that it represents a debate between powerful interests while ignoring perspectives that challenge the " fundamental premises " of all these interests.
As well, Chomsky has said that while the media are against corruption, they are not against society legally empowering corporate interests which is a reflection of the powerful interests that the model would predict.
Chomsky subsequently said that asking for the preface to be removed is his one regret in the matter.
Noam Chomsky has said that Anthony Lewis is at " the far left of the spectrum " that is available in the mainstream media, and thus is useful in discovering the tacit assumptions that underlie all mainstream discussion.
" Buckley's celebrated politeness sometimes wore thin: in a 1969 debate with linguist and political activist Noam Chomsky, Buckley said " I rejoice in your disposition to argue the Vietnam question, especially when I recognize what an act of self-control this must involve.
Linguist and activist Noam Chomsky has said that while it offers an alternative to capitalism, its still embedded in a capitalist system which limits Mondragon's decisions:

Chomsky and social
Noam Chomsky argues in Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media that people in modern society consist of decision-makers and social participants who have to be made to agree.
For example, Peter Hain interprets libertarian socialism as minarchist rather than anarchist, favoring radical decentralization of power without going as far as the complete abolition of the state and libertarian socialist Noam Chomsky supports dismantling all forms of unjustified social or economic power, while also emphasizing that state intervention should be supported as a temporary protection while oppressive structures remain in existence.
# Anti-Communism: This was included as a filter in the original 1988 edition of the book, but Chomsky argues that since the end of the Cold War ( 1945 – 91 ), anticommunism was replaced by the " War on Terror ", as the major social control mechanism.
A member of the Industrial Workers of the World ( IWW ), Chomsky is a self-described Anarcho-Syndicalist, a position which he sees as the appropriate application of classical liberal political theory to contemporary industrial society: " Now a federated, decentralized system of free associations, incorporating economic as well as other social institutions, would be what I refer to as anarcho-syndicalism ; and it seems to me that this is the appropriate form of social organization for an advanced technological society in which human beings do not have to be forced into the position of tools, of cogs in the machine.
Associated from the outset with radical left-wing politics and issues of social justice, City Lights has in recent years augmented its list of political non-fiction, publishing books by Noam Chomsky, Michael Parenti, Howard Zinn, Cindy Sheehan, and Ward Churchill.
Rejecting the nativist account of language acquisition proposed by Noam Chomsky, Bruner offered an alternative in the form of an interactionist or social interactionist theory of language development.
Chomsky argues that since the end of the Cold War ( 1945 – 91 ), anticommunism was replaced by the " War on Terror ", as the major social control mechanism.
The CPC also made a splash and stretched public debate in its early development by hosting a day-long Capitol Hill Forum on Globalization, Economic Justice, and Human Rights, during which Noam Chomsky, distinguished linguist and social commentator, was the keynote speaker -- his only public testimony ever presented before Congress.
* While Chomsky was revolutionizing linguistics, the rest of social science was asleep .» Chomsky was revolutionizing linguistics.
Influential American anarchists include Josiah Warren, Henry David Thoreau, Lysander Spooner, Lucy Parsons, Murray Rothbard, Benjamin Tucker, Voltairine de Cleyre, Johann Most, Luigi Galleani, Emma Goldman, Alexander Berkman, social ecologist Murray Bookchin, Paul Goodman, and linguist Noam Chomsky.
In a broad sense, people who may share with " traditional socialism a distrust of the market, of private investment, and of the achievement ethic, and a commitment to expansion of the welfare state " might sometimes be described as “ left-libertarians .” More narrowly, some social anarchists and libertarian socialists, including Murray Bookchin, are sometimes characterized as “ left-libertarian .”, and Noam Chomsky, who identifies as a “ libertarian socialist ,” applies the “ left-libertarian ” label to himself.

Chomsky and Alex
In the past several years, several notable musicians have come from Dallas, including Erykah Badu, Gibby Haynes of the Butthole Surfers, Mike Nesmith of The Monkees, Neon Indian, The Polyphonic Spree, Old 97s, St. Vincent, Edie Brickell & the New Bohemians, LehtMoJoe, Toadies, MeatLoaf, Baboon, The Secret Machines, Dorrough, Mount Righteous, The Paper Chase, Devourment, Absu, Course of Empire, Coilback, MC 900 Ft. Jesus, Reverend Horton Heat, Lone Star Trio, Sofa Kingdom, Princess Tex, End Over End, The Trees, Three On A Hill, Buck Pets, About Nine Times, Last Rites, Sara Hickman, Robin Myrick, Meredith Miller, Mildred, Orange Schubert, Picket Line Coyotes, Chomsky, The Deathray Davies, Shallow Reign, Loco Gringos, Hash Palace, Yeah, Yeah, Yeah !, Decadent Dub Team, Rigor Mortis, Karma Gettin, Lithium X-mas, Matthew and the Arrogant Sea and Alex Moore and Pantera.

Chomsky and Carey
* The Palestinians of Israel / an interview with Azmi Bishara in The new Intifada: resisting Israel ’ s apartheid, edited by Roane Carey ; introduction by Noam Chomsky, London ; New York: Verso, 2001, ISBN 1-950943-77-8

0.532 seconds.