Help


[permalink] [id link]
+
Page "Generalized System of Preferences" ¶ 6
from Wikipedia
Edit
Promote Demote Fragment Fix

Some Related Sentences

Critics and assert
Critics assert that the empirical evidence does not support the views of the anti-globalization movement.
Critics of capitalism including socialists and other anti-capitalists often assert that crony capitalism is the inevitable result of any capitalist system.
Critics of the Situationists frequently assert that their ideas are not in fact complex and difficult to understand, but are at best simple ideas expressed in deliberately difficult language, and at worst actually nonsensical.
Critics also noted the similarity to Unisys ' attempts to assert rights over the GIF image compression standard via LZW patent enforcement.
" Critics have accused it of being an antisemitic " pseudo-scholarly body " with links to neo-Nazi organizations, and assert that its primary purpose is to disseminate views denying key facts of Nazism and the genocide of Jews and others.
Critics have accused the Institute of antisemitism and having links to neo-Nazi organizations, and assert that its primary focus is denying key facts of Nazism and the genocide of Jews and others.
Critics also assert that Joseph Smith instituted polygamy in order to cover-up an 1835 adulterous affair with a neighbor's daughter, Fanny Alger, by taking Alger as his second wife.
Critics assert that Terrace used his analysis to destroy the movement of ape-language research.
Critics assert that naked CDSs should be banned, comparing them to buying fire insurance on your neighbor ’ s house, which creates a huge incentive for arson.
Critics of Yanagita's work assert that his conception of " the common people " is overly homogenous, eliding most local difference and conflict in favor of an organic conception of the Japanese nation-state.
Critics assert that Maggie's need for love and acceptance is her underlying motivation throughout The Mill on the Floss, and the conflicts that arise in the novel often stem from her frustrated attempts at gaining this acceptance.
Critics of the ICRC assert discrimination since Turkey and Egypt were granted membership in 1929 while using the Islamic Red Crescent as their emblem, citing the same concerns about the cross.
Critics from defenders of proprietorship sometimes assert that the All People's Right threatens the essence of ownership and the " management practices " of property owners, who may or may not have created and preserved environmentally important qualities Private owners and their representatives have also argued that newly created access rights ought to lead to financial compensation for private landowners, though they tend to also argue that there should be no corresponding compensation for people who historically tended now-expropriated land in common, with proven ecological records — for example, aboriginals.
Critics assert that Conyers has been influenced by publishing houses who have contributed significant money to Conyers.
Critics of SDP decisions usually assert that those liberties ought to be left to the more politically accountable branches of government.
Critics assert that the very fact that religion was the primary selector for research subjects may have introduced a bias, and that the fact that all subjects were holocaust survivors may also have had an effect.
Critics of SDP decisions typically assert that those liberties ought to be left to the more politically accountable branches of government.
Critics of Lamsa assert that he, like many native speakers Aramaic, extend the semantic areas of words beyond the evidence of existent texts.
Critics assert that much original work by Michelangelo – in particular pentimenti, highlights and shadows, and other detailing painted a secco – was lost in the removal of various accretions.
Critics assert that it is unvalidated and lacks specificity.
Critics of the OFBCI, including Americans United for Separation of Church and State and the American Civil Liberties Union, assert that it violated the Establishment Clause by using tax money to fund religion.
Critics of the group, such as the similarly named Americans for Medical Progress, dismiss it as a shell organization that " exists primarily as a website to publicize the views and promote the book " of founders Ray and Jean Greek, and assert that it ignores the significant medical advances made through animal-based research.
Critics of sovereign citizen theory assert that sovereign citizens fail to sufficiently examine the context of the case laws from which they cite, and ignore adverse evidence, such as Federalist No. 15, where Alexander Hamilton expressed the view that the Constitution placed everyone personally under federal authority.
Critics assert that the newer requirements will eventually lead to a shortage of qualified mariners, especially in places like the United States.

Critics and these
Critics of this type of argument have tended to point out that this is just a standard criticism of representative democracy — a democratically elected government will not always act in the direction of greatest current public support — and that, therefore, there is no inconsistency in the leaders ' positions given that these countries are parliamentary democracies.
Critics of these and other controversial diagnoses often cite the DSM's previous inclusion of homosexuality, and the APA's eventual decision to remove it, as a precedent for current disputes.
Critics of these versions, such as Taoism scholar Eugene Eoyang, claim that translators like Stephen Mitchell produce readings of the Tao Te Ching that deviate from the text and are incompatible with the history of Chinese thought.
Critics have objected to GMOs on several grounds, including tampering with nature, ecological concerns, economic concerns raised by the fact these organisms are often subject to intellectual property law, whether food produced from GMOs should be banned or labelled, whether such food is safe, and whether GM crops are useful to address the world's food needs.
Critics have objected to GM crops per se on several grounds, including ecological concerns, and economic concerns raised by the fact these organisms are subject to intellectual property law.
Critics in Congress worried whether these " foreigners ", unacquainted with democracy, could or should become citizens.
Critics of mind control theories caution against the broader implications of these conversion models.
Critics claimed that these laws would lead to " 24-hour drinking ".
Critics have pointed to the Forer effect to suggest some of these appear to be more accurate and discriminating than they really are.
Critics may respond that this view seems to imply it would be similarly wrong for humans to try to reduce suffering in these ways, a position which few would advocate.
Critics use these statistics to support the original claim that originally it was not a merger of equals, that it was a takeover of UMIST by Manchester University and that this was not in UMIST's best interests.
Critics claim that these theories, when used as an explanation for fine-tuning, commit the inverse gambler's fallacy.
Critics of these views argue that withholding taxes in domestic trade or defying powerful nations regarding trade in narcotics or arms will very rapidly prove dangerous or fatal to some of the participants-and, furthermore, that at least some of these decisions are unpopular and are not reflective of the public will.
Critics have pointed out that Norway's economic structure is highly dependent on natural resources that do not require skilled labor, making economic growth highly vulnerable to fluctuations in the demand and pricing for these natural resources.
Critics of the claim for species status argue that these differences were caused by pathologies of anatomy and physiology.
Critics have also pointed out that landlocked humans without access to fish develop normal brains and these nutritional requirements are easily met with a land-based diet.
Critics suggest that Shakespeare did similar work with these sources in Othello, Julius Caesar and Coriolanus.
Critics of this practice such as Greenpeace, claim these practices contribute to inequality between developing countries rich in biodiversity, and developed countries hosting companies that engage in ' biopiracy '.
You've seen these two expert and resourceful players in " Citizen Kane "-" The Magnificent Ambersons " in which Miss Moorehead's performance won her the 1942 Film Critics ' Award.
Critics cite the financial involvement of the foundation as the turning point when these clinics began to change from giving practical experience to engaging in advocacy.
Critics of Cabot's growth, such as the Little Rock-based newspaper Arkansas Times, accused these residents of " white flight ": simply giving up on an integrated Little Rock school district.
Critics of both are concerned that these large businesses will leverage their economic and political power to defeat attempts to regulate or restrain the spread of genetic engineering in agriculture, or leverage intellectual property rights in GMOs to unfair advantage over their competitors, against the interests of users and consumers of their products, and to the detriment of the environment.
Critics of GMOs and corporations say that these rights give already powerful corporations an even greater advantage, and in a way which disrupts millennia-old agricultural practices.
Critics contend that these requirements base salvation on the ' teachings of men ' rather than the grace of God or the instructions of the Bible.

0.205 seconds.