HAARP has been blamed by conspiracy theorists for a range of events, including numerous natural disasters.

The HAARP has been constructed at the previous site of an over-the-horizon radar ( OTH ) installation.

The HAARP site has been constructed in three distinct phases:

Computer scientist David Naiditch has also referred to HAARP as " a magnet for conspiracy theorists ", saying the project has been blamed for triggering catastrophes such as floods, droughts, hurricanes, thunderstorms, and devastating earthquakes in Pakistan and the Philippines, major power outages, the downing of TWA Flight 800, Gulf War syndrome, and chronic fatigue syndrome.

* Author of the self-published Angels Don't Play This HAARP, Nick Begich has told lecture audiences that HAARP could trigger earthquakes and turn the upper atmosphere into a giant lens so that " the sky would literally appear to burn ".

The High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program ( HAARP ) is an ionospheric research program jointly funded by the U. S. Air Force, the U. S. Navy, the University of Alaska, and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency ( DARPA ).

In addition, scientific results obtained with HAARP are routinely published in major research journals ( such as Geophysical Research Letters, or Journal of Geophysical Research ), written both by university scientists ( American and foreign ) or by U. S. Department of Defense research lab scientists.

HAARP approaches the study of the ionosphere by following in the footsteps of an ionospheric heater called EISCAT near Tromsø, Norway.

The means range from stopping the growth of human societies through reproductive health and family planning programs, which promote abstinence, contraception and abortion, or intentionally reducing the bulk of the world population through genocides by mongering unnecessary wars, through plagues by engineering emergent viruses and tainting vaccines, and through environmental disasters by controlling the weather ( HAARP, chemtrails ), etc.

* Stereoscopic Observations of HAARP Glows from HIPAS, Poker Flat, and Nenana, Alaska by R. F.

*" Intro ", by Muse from HAARP

The HAARP program operates a major sub-arctic facility, named the HAARP Research Station, on an Air Force – owned site near Gakona, Alaska.

An Air Force spokeswoman said Ventura made an official request to visit the research station but was rejected -" he and his crew showed up at HAARP anyway and were denied access ".

HAARP was also featured in the animated series G. I.

The most prominent instrument at the HAARP Station is the Ionospheric Research Instrument ( IRI ), a high-power radio frequency transmitter facility operating in the high frequency ( HF ) band.

Work on the HAARP Station began in 1993.

As of 2008, HAARP had incurred around $ 250 million in tax-funded construction and operating costs.

The HAARP project directs a 3. 6 MW signal, in the 2. 8 – 10 MHz region of the HF ( high-frequency ) band, into the ionosphere.

According to the HAARP team, this will advance the study of basic natural processes that occur in the ionosphere under the natural but much stronger influence of solar interaction, and how the natural ionosphere affects radio signals.

The HAARP program began in 1990.

The HAARP facility regularly ( once a year on most years according to the HAARP home page ) hosts open houses, during which time any civilian may tour the entire facility.

Each summer, the HAARP holds a summer school for visiting students, including foreign nationals, giving them an opportunity to do research with one of the world's foremost research instruments.

Various aspects of HAARP can study all of the main layers of the ionosphere.

HAARP performs the same functions but with more power and a more flexible and agile HF beam.

The small effects that are produced, however, can be observed with the sensitive scientific instruments installed at the HAARP Station, and these observations can provide information about the dynamics of plasmas and insight into the processes of solar-terrestrial interactions.

Besides I heard her old uncle that stays there has been doin' it ''.

Southern resentment has been over the method of its ending, the invasion, and Reconstruction ; ;

The situation of the South since 1865 has been unique in the western world.

The North should thank its stars that such has been the case ; ;

As it is, they consider that the North is now reaping the fruits of excess egalitarianism, that in spite of its high standard of living the `` American way '' has been proved inferior to the English and Scandinavian ways, although they disapprove of the socialistic features of the latter.

In what has aptly been called a `` constitutional revolution '', the basic nature of government was transformed from one essentially negative in nature ( the `` night-watchman state '' ) to one with affirmative duties to perform.

For lawyers, reflecting perhaps their parochial preferences, there has been a special fascination since then in the role played by the Supreme Court in that transformation -- the manner in which its decisions altered in `` the switch in time that saved nine '', President Roosevelt's ill-starred but in effect victorious `` Court-packing plan '', the imprimatur of judicial approval that was finally placed upon social legislation.

Labor relations have been transformed, income security has become a standardized feature of political platforms, and all the many facets of the American version of the welfare state have become part of the conventional wisdom.

Historically, however, the concept is one that has been of marked benefit to the people of the Western civilizational group.

In recent weeks, as a result of a sweeping defense policy reappraisal by the Kennedy Administration, basic United States strategy has been modified -- and large new sums allocated -- to meet the accidental-war danger and to reduce it as quickly as possible.

The malignancy of such a landscape has been beautifully described by the Australian Charles Bean.

There has probably always been a bridge of some sort at the southeastern corner of the city.

Even though in most cases the completion of the definitive editions of their writings is still years off, enough documentation has already been assembled to warrant drawing a new composite profile of the leadership which performed the heroic dual feats of winning American independence and founding a new nation.

Madison once remarked: `` My life has been so much a public one '', a comment which fits the careers of the other six.

Thus we are compelled to face the urbanization of the South -- an urbanization which, despite its dramatic and overwhelming effects upon the Southern culture, has been utterly ignored by the bulk of Southern writers.

But the South is, and has been for the past century, engaged in a wide-sweeping urbanization which, oddly enough, is not reflected in its literature.

An example of the changes which have crept over the Southern region may be seen in the Southern Negro's quest for a position in the white-dominated society, a problem that has been reflected in regional fiction especially since 1865.

In the meantime, while the South has been undergoing this phenomenal modernization that is so disappointing to the curious Yankee, Southern writers have certainly done little to reflect and promote their region's progress.

Faulkner culminates the Southern legend perhaps more masterfully than it has ever been, or could ever be, done.

The `` approximate '' is important, because even after the order of the work has been established by the chance method, the result is not inviolable.

But it has been during the last two centuries, during the scientific revolution, that our independence from the physical environment has made the most rapid strides.

In the life sciences, there has been an enormous increase in our understanding of disease, in the mechanisms of heredity, and in bio- and physiological chemistry.

Even in domains where detailed and predictive understanding is still lacking, but where some explanations are possible, as with lightning and weather and earthquakes, the appropriate kind of human action has been more adequately indicated.

The persistent horror of having a malformed child has, I believe, been reduced, not because we have gained any control over this misfortune, but precisely because we have learned that we have so little control over it.