Help


[permalink] [id link]
+
Page "Mercantilism" ¶ 64
from Wikipedia
Edit
Promote Demote Fragment Fix

Some Related Sentences

Hume and famously
For instance, David Hume famously regarded Space and Time as nothing more than psychological facts about human beings, which would effectively reduce Space and Time to ideas, which are properties of humans ( substances ).
David Hume famously argued in A Treatise of Human Nature that people invariably slip between describing that the world is a certain way to saying therefore we ought to conclude on a particular course of action.
The idea of substance was famously critiqued by David Hume, who held that since substance is not able to be perceived, it should not be assumed to exist.
Hume famously remarked that, " We speak not strictly and philosophically when we talk of the combat of passion and of reason.
Hume famously rejected the idea of any meaningful statement that did not fall into this schema, saying:
But the instructional sciences are based on induction ; and as David Hume famously points out induction is not the same as truth.
Hume famously claimed that reason is, and ought to be, only the slave of the passions.

Hume and noted
It was first sighted by Europeans during an expedition of Hamilton Hume and William Hovell in 1824, when the area, first named " Swampy " was noted that agricultural settlement.
The importance of Machiavelli's realism was noted by many important figures in this endeavor, for example Bodin, Francis Bacon, Descartes, Harrington, Rousseau, Hume and Adam Smith.
Allan Octavian Hume noted based on the observation of " hundreds of nests " that they always nested on large trees near habitations even when there were convenient cliffs in the vicinity.
Allan Octavian Hume and Stuart Baker noted that the stronghold of the species was north of the Ganges and west of the Brahmaputra, mainly in Maldah, Purnea, Madhubani and Purulia districts of present day Bihar.
Hume collected a specimen in Manipur which he noted was very rare, hiding among dense reeds in Loktak Lake.
His nephew, David, later Baron Hume, the noted Scottish jurist was baptised 1757 at Chirnside.
Arthur Schopenhauer's philosophy is noted for the quality and readability of its prose, as are some of the works of the British Empiricists, such as Locke and Hume.
When other pieces on religion by Hume are taken into consideration, it may be noted that they all end with ( apparently ) ironic statements reaffirming the truth of Christian religious views.

Hume and impossibility
In An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, David Hume uses Epicurus as a character for explaining the impossibility of our knowing God to be any greater or better than his creation proves him to be.

Hume and goal
Mo Takaloo celebrates his goal which saves Maidstone from relegation at Folkestone InvictaMaidstone, who were now managed by Lloyd Hume and Alan Walker in a joint capacity, surprisingly managed to win the league at the first time of asking, gaining promotion to the Isthmian League Premier Division.
It is progressively being upgraded to freeway standard with the goal to ultimately bypass all towns between the Hume Freeway and north of Shepparton.

Hume and constant
A central problem in the philosophy of science, going back to David Hume, is that of distinguishing causal relationships ( such as those implied by laws ) from principles that arise due to constant conjunction.
A central problem in the philosophy of science, going back to David Hume, is that of distinguishing scientific laws from principles that arise merely accidentally because of the constant conjunction of one thing and another.
Hume argued that we can never see one event cause another, but only the constant conjunction of events.

Hume and positive
Hume, however, stopped short when it came to the positive side of the theory, where God was called upon to replace such connections, complaining that ' We are got into fairy land [...] Our line is too short to fathom such immense abysses.
The methodological basis for a positive / normative distinction has its roots in the fact-value distinction in philosophy, the principal proponents of such distinctions being David Hume and G. E. Moore.
In particular, David Hume ( 1711 – 1776 ) argued that human beings are unable to ground normative arguments in positive arguments, that is, to derive ought from is.

Hume and trade
Hume panned gold and mined for a number of years in addition to operating a trade store off and on.

Hume and .
What Hume calls `` sensation '' is what Whitehead calls `` perception in the mode of presentational immediacy '' which is a sophisticated abstraction from perception in the mode of causal efficacy.
But at the touch of Hume and Voltaire the noble or hideous visitations which had haunted the mind since Agamemnon's blood cried out for vengeance, disappeared altogether or took tawdry refuge among the gaslights of melodrama.
The justification for attributing life to objects was stated by David Hume in his Natural History of Religion ( Section III ): " There is a universal tendency among mankind to conceive all beings like themselves, and to transfer to every object those qualities with which they are familiarly acquainted, and of which they are intimately conscious.
An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding is a book by the Scottish empiricist philosopher David Hume, published in 1748.
Hume was disappointed with the reception of the Treatise, which " fell stillborn from the press ," as he put it, and so tried again to disseminate his more developed ideas to the public by writing a shorter and more polemical work.
After expounding his epistemology, Hume explains how to apply his principles to specific topics.
In the first section of the Enquiry, Hume provides a rough introduction to philosophy as a whole.
Next, Hume discusses the distinction between impressions and ideas.
According to Hume, the difference between the two is that ideas are less vivacious than impressions.
Hume accepts that ideas may be either the product of mere sensation, or of the imagination working in conjunction with sensation.
According to Hume, the creative faculty makes use of ( at least ) four mental operations which produce imaginings out of sense-impressions.
( Hume 1974: 317 ) In a later chapter, he also mentions the operations of mixing, separating, and dividing.
( Hume 1974: 340 ) Fig.
This seems to pose a serious problem for the empirical account, though Hume brushes it aside as an exceptional case by stating that one may experience a novel idea that itself is derived from combinations of previous impressions.
In this chapter, Hume discusses how thoughts tend to come in sequences, as in trains of thought.
In the first part, Hume discusses how the objects of inquiry are either " relations of ideas " or " matters of fact ", which is roughly the distinction between analytic and synthetic propositions.
( Hume 1974: 322 ) In explaining how matters of fact are entirely a product of experience, he dismisses the notion that they may be arrived at through a priori reasoning.
For Hume, every effect only follows its cause arbitrarily — they are entirely distinct from one another.
( Hume 1974: 330-332 ) Here he is describing what would become known as the problem of induction.
For Hume, we assume that experience tells us something about the world because of habit or custom, which human nature forces us to take seriously.
By " necessary connection ", Hume means the power or force which necessarily ties one idea to another.
Unlike his predecessors, Berkeley and Locke, Hume rejects the idea that volitions or impulses of the will may be inferred to necessarily connect to the actions they produce by way of some sense of the power of the will.
( Hume 1974: 353-354 ) He produces like arguments against the notion that we have knowledge of these powers as they affect the mind alone.
( Hume 1974: 355-356 ) He also argues in brief against the idea that causes are mere occasions of the will of some god ( s ), a view associated with the philosopher Nicolas Malebranche.
Hume believes that all disputes on the subject have been merely verbal arguments — that is to say, arguments which are based on a lack of prior agreement on definitions.

0.582 seconds.