* United States v. Chadwick ( 1977 )

* A unanimous opinion in Chadwick v. Janecka ( 3d Cir.

The court paid much consideration to two previous Supreme Court cases that involved authorities conducting a warrantless search of a vehicle in order to examine the contents of a container inside of the vehicle: United States v. Chadwick ( 433 U. S. 1 ) and Arkansas v. Sanders ( 442 U. S. 753 ).

Justice Brennan reasoned that the possibility the police or other “ unwelcome meddlers ” might rummage through the trash bags “ does not negate the expectation of privacy in their contents any more than the possibility of a burglary negates an expectation of privacy in the home .” Under United States v. Chadwick, the bags could not have been searched without a warrant had Greenwood been carrying them in public.

Following him in varying degrees of scepticism were T.W. Shore, H.M. Chadwick, Thomas Hodgkin and F. G. Beck.

In the main stream of historical thinking is a group of scholars, H.M. Chadwick, R.H. Hodgkin, Sir Frank Stenton et al. who are in varying degrees sceptical of the native traditions of the conquest but who defend the catastrophic type of invasion suggested by them.

The explanation for these different isotopes awaited the discovery of the neutron, a neutral-charged particle with a mass similar to the proton, by the physicist James Chadwick in 1932.

In addition to his personal recollections, he had access to the records of Henry Chadwick, the game's first statistician and archivist.

* Ventris, Michael and John Chadwick, 1973.

In 1905, after Henry Chadwick wrote an article saying that baseball grew from the British sports of cricket and rounders, Spalding called for a commission to find out the real source of baseball.

Receiving the archives of Henry Chadwick in 1908, Spalding combined these records with his own memories ( and biases ) to write America's National Game ( published 1911 ) which, despite its flaws, was probably the first scholarly account of the history of baseball.

* Chadwick, Henry, “ Faith and Order at the Council of Nicaea ”, Harvard Theological Review LIII ( Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press, 1960 ), 171-195.

The practice of keeping records of player achievements was started in the 19th century by Henry Chadwick.

Based on his experience with cricket, Chadwick devised the predecessors to modern day statistics including batting average, runs scored, and runs allowed.

In 1903, the British sportswriter Henry Chadwick published an article speculating that baseball derived from a British game called rounders, which Chadwick had played as a boy in England.

According to Nora Chadwick, in Celtic Ireland " Beltine ( or Beltaine ) was celebrated on 1 May, a spring-time festival of optimism.

* Chadwick, Nora ( 1970 ) The Celts.

* The Borzoi Handbook Winifred E. Chadwick.

In the words of Henry Chadwick, " If the Consolation contains nothing distinctively Christian, it is also relevant that it contains nothing specifically pagan either ... is a work written by a Platonist who is also a Christian, but is not a Christian work.

There are significant works by composers such as Hans Werner Henze of Germany, Gilbert Biberian of England and Roland Chadwick of Australia.

Chadwick Hansen ’ s Witchcraft at Salem, published in 1969, defined Mather as a positive influence on the Salem Trials.

Some historians who have examined the life of Cotton Mather after Chadwick Hansen ’ s book also seem to yearn for a positive view of Cotton Mather.

2002 ), a U. S. court of appeals held that H. Beatty Chadwick could be held indefinitely under federal law, for his failure to produce US $ 2. 5 mill.

Lincoln denounced the Supreme Court decision in Dred Scott v. Sandford as a conspiracy to extend slavery.

In March 1857, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Dred Scott v. Sandford ; Chief Justice Roger B. Taney opined that blacks were not citizens, and derived no rights from the Constitution.

One example of this ( from the Queen's Bench in England ) is Doyle v Olby ( Ironmongers ) Ltd 2 QB 158, the claimant appealed ( successfully ) on the basis that, although he won in the court below, the lower court had applied the wrong measure of damages and he had not been fully recompensated.

" " Graham v. Borgen ", 483 F 3d.

* Emperor Charles I. of Austria ( 1916 – 1918 ) http :// www. youtube. com / watch? v = jMU9FFzez1A

* Emperor Franz Joseph ( 1848 – 1916 ) http :// www. youtube. com / watch? v = jecUwMPk8pE & feature = related

The doctrine that no man can cast off his native allegiance without the consent of his sovereign was early abandoned in the United States, and Chief Justice John Rutledge also declared in Talbot v. Janson, " a man may, at the same time, enjoy the rights of citizenship under two governments.

Austrian economics, 3 v. Edward Elgar.

Description and scroll to chapter preview links for v. 1.

Part of Title I was found unconstitutional by the United States Supreme Court as it pertains to states in the case of Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett as violating the sovereign immunity rights of the several states as specified by the Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution.

In fact, Congress explicitly cited Toyota v. Williams in the text of the ADAAA itself as one of its driving influences for passing the ADAAA.

Access Now v. Southwest Airlines

Access Now v. Southwest Airlines was a case where the District Court decided that the website of Southwest Airlines was not in violation of the Americans with Disability Act because the ADA is concerned with things with a physical existence and thus cannot be applied to cyberspace.

( Most notably, in the case Li v. Yellow Cab Co., 13 Cal. 3d 804 ( 1975 ), the California Supreme Court adopted the principle of comparative negligence in the face of a California Civil Code provision codifying the traditional common-law doctrine of contributory negligence.

See, e. g., Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States, ( giving federal courts the authority to fashion common law rules with respect to issues of federal power, in this case negotiable instruments backed by the federal government ); see also International News Service v. Associated Press, 248 U. S. 215 ( 1918 ) ( creating a cause of action for misappropriation of " hot news " that lacks any statutory grounding, but that is one of the handful of federal common law actions that survives today ); National Basketball Association v. Motorola, Inc., 105 F. 3d 841, 843-44, 853 ( 2d Cir.

" Amchem Prods., Inc. v. Windsor, 521 U. S. 591, 617 ( 1997 ) ( quoting Mace v. Van Ru Credit Corp., 109 F. 3d 388, 344 ( 7th Cir.

* 1972 – The California Supreme Court in the case of People v. Anderson, 6 Cal. 3d 628 invalidates the state's death penalty and commutes the sentences of all death row inmates to life imprisonment.

In Archuleta v. Hedrick, 365 F. 3d 644 ( 8th Cir.

In California, a nolo contendere plea is known as a West plea after a seminal case involving plea bargains, People v. West ( 1970 ) 3 Cal. 3d 595.

v. Crumley's, Inc., 174 P. 3d 948, Mont., 2008 )

The claim that secular humanism could be considered a religion for legal purposes was examined by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Peloza v. Capistrano School District, 37 F. 3d 517 ( 9th Cir.

v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 28 F. 3d 1042: trade secrets and software systems.

In 1995, South Dakota challenged the authority of the Secretary of Interior, under the IRA, to take of land into trust on behalf of the Lower Brulé Sioux Tribe ( based on the Rosebud Indian Reservation ), in South Dakota v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 69 F. 3d 878, 881-85 ( 8th Cir.

* Rancman v. Interim Settlement Funding Corp., 99 Ohio St. 3d 121 ( 2003 )

The " Some Credible Evidence " standard does not require the fact-finder to weigh conflicting evidence, merely requiring the investigator or prosecutor to present the bare minimum of material credible evidence to support the allegations against the subject, or in support of the allegation ; see Valmonte v. Bane, 18 F. 3d 992 ( 2nd Cir.

v. Smith, 15 F. 3d 1519, 1527 ( 9th Cir. 1994 ).

:: Example: “ ervousness alone does not justify extended detention and questioning about matters not related to the stop .” United States v. Chavez-Valenzuela, 268 F. 3d 719, 725 ( 9th Cir.

2001 ); accord United States v. Beck, 140 F. 3d 1129, 1139 ( 8th Cir.

1998 ); United States v. Wood, 106 F. 3d 942, 248 ( 10th Cir.

See, e. g., United States v. Winnie, 97 F. 3d 975 ( 7th Cir.

" Source: State v. Anderson, 141 Wash. 2d 357, 5 P. 3d 1247, 1253 ( 2000 ).

:: Example: See also Eolas Technologies Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., 399 F. 3d 1325, 1339 ( C. A. Fed. 2005 ) (“ oftware code ... drives the functional nucleus of the finished computer product .” ( quoting Imagexpo, L. L. C.

See, e. g., State v. Gore, 143 Wash. 2d 288, 313-14, 21 P. 3d 262 ( 2001 ), overruled by State v. Hughes, 154 Wash. 2d 118, 110 P. 3d 192 ( 2005 ); contra Blakely, 124 S. Ct.