However, as in Cantor's argument ( above ), this idea leads to difficulties.

However, in CL it is necessary to explicitly refer to the function namespace when passing a function as an argument — which is also a common occurrence, as in the example above.

" This form of the argument is far more difficult to separate from a purely first cause argument than is the example of the house's maintenance above, because here the First Cause is insufficient without the candle's or vessel's continued existence.

Given the definition of above, we might fix ( or ' bind ') the first argument, producing a function of type.

The above definition implies this one: the upper bound of the empty subset is any existing element of A, because A is nonempty ; furthermore, as provable with an induction argument over the size of nonempty finite subsets, the upper bound of a finite subset may be obtained by finding upper bounds of pairs iteratively.

Then, using the periodic Bernoulli function P < sub > n </ sub > defined above and repeating the argument on the interval, one can obtain an expression of ƒ ( 1 ).

In this notation, the use of a vertical bar as delimiter indicates that the argument following it is the " parameter " ( as defined above ), while the backslash indicates that it is the modular angle.

Heawood noticed Kempe's mistake and also observed that if one was satisfied with proving only five colors are needed, one could run through the above argument ( changing only that the minimal counterexample requires 6 colors ) and use Kempe chains in the degree 5 situation to prove the five color theorem.

The argument above began by giving an unavoidable set of five configurations ( a single vertex with degree 1, a single vertex with degree 2, ..., a single vertex with degree 5 ) and then proceeded to show that the first 4 are reducible ; to exhibit an unavoidable set of configurations where every configuration in the set is reducible would prove the theorem.

The argument above may not hold for the universe as a whole, since travel times may well explain the lack of physical presence on Earth of alien inhabitants of far away galaxies.

An illustration of Cantor's diagonal argument for the existence of uncountable set s. The sequence at the bottom cannot occur anywhere in the infinite list of sequences above.

However, when k ≥ 3, the expected value is well-defined, and by the above argument, it is

Yet he attacks the idealism of Schopenhauer and Descartes with an argument similar to Kant's critique of the latter ( see above );

In the above argument, the assertion " this number is either rational or irrational " invokes the law of excluded middle.

In the argument above, for any and, whenever and are true, necessarily is true.

If S contains two elements that are not pairwise orthogonal ( in particular, the set of all quantum states includes such pairs ) then an argument like that given above shows that the answer is no.

Though some points above may be arguable, but some key points seemingly aren't giving that it would require one to abide by many of the premises to even make an argument to begin with.

In the Leipzig disputation with Martin Luther, 1519, Johann Eck used the Corpus, specifically the Angelic Hierarchy, as argument for the apostolic origin of papal supremacy, pressing the Platonist analogy, " as above, so below ".

Since E < sub > 2 </ sub >-E < sub > 1 </ sub > ≫ kT, it follows that the argument of the exponential in the equation above is a large negative number, and as such N < sub > 2 </ sub >/ N < sub > 1 </ sub > is vanishingly small ; i. e., there are almost no atoms in the excited state.

Paedobaptists point to a number of passages in the New Testament which seem to corroborate the above argument.

( In the above symbolic argument, " x is the smallest rational number " would be R and " r < sub > 0 </ sub > ( which is different from x ) is the smallest rational number " would be ¬ R.

It is common to use this first type of argument with propositions such as the one above, concerning the non-existence of some mathematical object.

Thus, as per Draper's argument above, the theory that there is an omniscient and omnipotent being who is indifferent requires no hidden reasons in order to explain evil.

The criterion, given above for the solvability of the word problem in a single group can be extended to a criterion for the uniform solvability of the word problem for a class of finitely presented groups by a straightforward argument.

And here again we hear the same refrain mentioned above: `` the paramount goal of the United States set long ago was to guard the rights of the individual, ensure his development, enlarge his opportunity ''.

Without the good magazines, without their book reviews, their hospitality to European writers, without above all their awareness of literary standards, we might very well have had a generation of Krim's heroes -- Wolfes, Farrells, Dreisers, and I might add, Sandburgs and Frosts and MacLeishes in verse -- and then where would we be??

In the above development we have applied the thermodynamics of equilibrium ( referred to by some as thermostatics ) to the steady state.

if we take Af above, that will be large enough.

With the above results we can make the following remarks about the graph of F.

Simultaneously we should be underlining the interrelationships of technical progress in various fields, showing how agricultural training can be introduced into education, how health affects labor productivity, how small business can benefit the rural farm community, and, above all, how progress in each field relates to national progress.

It is said that another heaven is to the southward and upward of this one, and it is called Andlang ' Endlong ' but the third heaven is yet above that, and it is called Vídbláin ' Wide-blue ' and in that heaven we think this abode is.

Referring to the above sketch of Spartan history, we find Agesilaus shining most in its first and last period, as commencing and surrendering a glorious career in Asia, and as, in extreme age, maintaining his prostrate country.

As already pointed out above, we have to distinguish between medium-resolution spectrometers that are used for LS AAS and high-resolution spectrometers that are designed for CS AAS.

Using the above theorem it is easy to see that the original Borsuk Ulam statement is correct since if we take a map f: S < sup > n </ sup > → ℝ < sup > n </ sup > that does not equalize on any antipodes then we can construct a map g: S < sup > n </ sup > → S < sup > n-1 </ sup > by the formula

If we look at this situation from far above, so that we cannot see the supporters, we see the large balloon as a small object animated by erratic movement.

If we wish to implement this filter as a digital filter, we can apply the bilinear transform by substituting for the formula above ; after some reworking, we get the following filter representation:

If in the above we relax Banach space to normed space the analogous structure is called a normed algebra.

If we attempt to use the above formula to compute the derivative of f at zero, then we must evaluate 1 / g ′( f ( 0 )).

So the above product is always equal to the difference quotient, and to show that the derivative of at a exists and to determine its value, we need only show that the limit as x goes to a of the above product exists and determine its value.

By doing this to the formula above, we find:

Since the entries of the Jacobian matrix are partial derivatives, we may simplify the above formula to get: