Help


[permalink] [id link]
+
Page "Gillian McKeith" ¶ 11
from Wikipedia
Edit
Promote Demote Fragment Fix

Some Related Sentences

McKeith and argues
" In response to the criticism, McKeith argues: " I am on a crusade to change the nation and fortunately, or unfortunately, that is going to put me in the limelight.

McKeith and can
In May 2005, McKeith was given the Best Organic Businesses 2005 Consumer Education Award by the Soil Association, a British charity promoting organic food, in recognition of her work in " tackling obesity, championing healthier eating and promoting the contribution that organic fruit, vegetables and other products can make to sound nutrition.

McKeith and give
In this book, he refers to her as " Gillian McKeith ( or, to give her full medical title: Gillian McKeith )"-by implication referring to the controversial manner in which she attained her Doctor of Philosophy degree.

McKeith and .
Clifford represents Gillian McKeith, saying of her doctorate in nutrition potentially being misconstrued as a medical degree by viewers of her advertisements: " personally, I wish it had never been mentioned.
During the program she developed a close relationship with Stacey Solomon and Nigel Havers, while making an enemy of Gillian McKeith.
Gillian McKeith ( born 28 September 1959 ) is a Scottish nutritionist, television presenter, and writer.
McKeith takes a holistic approach to health, promoting exercise, a pescetarian diet high in fruits and vegetables, grains, beans, nuts, and tofu, and the avoidance of processed and high-calorie foods, sugar and fat, red meat, alcohol, caffeine, white flour, and additives.
McKeith was born in Perth, Scotland, and grew up on a council estate.
She is a member of the American Association of Nutritional Consultants, but this association runs no checks on the qualifications of its certified members, permitting Ben Goldacre to register his dead cat for the same qualification as McKeith.
If they failed to stick to it, McKeith moved in with them to make sure they followed her advice.
In her book You Are What You Eat, McKeith advocates examination of the tongue, the mapping of pimples, and detailed scrutiny of faecal matter and urine as indicators of health.
The MHRA found McKeith guilty of " selling goods without legal authorisation whilst making medicinal claims about their efficacy.
In 2007 McKeith presented Three Fat Brides, One Thin Dress for Channel 4, a competitive version of the You Are What You Eat format in which three women compete for a designer wedding dress.
In 2009 she appeared on the W Network in Canada on Eat Yourself Sexy, in which participants claimed to have a diminished sense of sex appeal or sex drive, with McKeith employing the same practices as in You Are What You Eat.
McKeith has threatened legal action against a number of critics, including nutrition professor John Garrow, who questioned her credentials in 2004.
Daily Telegraph journalist Tom Chivers states that McKeith does have a PhD, but she ceased to use the title ' Doctor ' voluntarily after the Advertising Standards Authority ruled her use of the title publicly broke two clauses of the Committee of Advertising Practice's code, regarding " substantiation " and " truthfulness ", and was " likely to mislead " the public into thinking she is a medical doctor.
*( 2006 ) Dr Gillian McKeith ’ s Shopping Guide.

also and argues
Swift however, Landa argues, is not merely criticizing economic maxims but also addressing the fact that England was denying Irish citizens their natural rights and dehumanizing them by viewing them as a mere commodity.
He also argues that the labor asymmetry can be explained in terms of a change in real wages, but this explanation fails to explain the business cycle in terms of resource allocation.
Several original treatises also survive, and include a work On Fate, in which he argues against the Stoic doctrine of necessity ; and one On the Soul.
According to the Talmud, Amram promulgated the laws of marriage and divorce amongst the Jews in Egypt ; the Talmud also argues that Amram had extreme longevity, which he used to ensure that doctrines were preserved through several generations.
( Hume 1974: 355-356 ) He also argues in brief against the idea that causes are mere occasions of the will of some god ( s ), a view associated with the philosopher Nicolas Malebranche.
He also argues that alternative conceptions of morality exist which do not rely on the assumptions that Kant makes – he cites utilitarianism as an example which does not require the summum bonum.
Martin also argues that a non-objective account of ethics might be acceptable and challenges the view that a subjective account of morality would lead to moral anarchy.
He also argues that John's " poor " Greek is a literary device since Galileans were known to have excellent Greek.
In A critique of Postcolonial Reason, Spivak argues that Western philosophy has a history of not only exclusion of the Subaltern from discourse, but also does not allow them to occupy the space of a fully human subject.
But, one opinion in the Jerusalem Talmud argues that the concubine should also receive a marriage contract, but without including a clause specifying a divorce settlement.
When the human main character, Takeru, argues that humans also have the ability to reproduce and disperse, the higher existence says carbon too easily mingles with other elements and therefore it would be impossible for a carbon-based existence to have evolved on its own.
But he argues that one can understand the Hebrew conception of love only by looking at one of the core commandments of Judaism, Leviticus 19: 18, " Love your neighbor as yourself ", also called the second Great Commandment.
Hunt argues that it was not the guilt of wickedness, but the shame of weakness that seized Germany's national psychology, and " served as a solvent of the Weimar democracy and also as an ideological cement of Hitler's dictatorship.
He also presents an argument against qualia ; he argues that the concept is so confused that it cannot be put to any use or understood in any non-contradictory way, and therefore does not constitute a valid refutation of physicalism.
The KMT also opposes Taiwan independence and argues that efforts to establish a Taiwanese national identity separated from the Chinese national identity are unnecessary and needlessly provocative.
Wayne Brindle argues, based on Paul's former writings against the Judaizers in Galatians and 2 Corinthians, that rumors had probably spread about Paul totally negating the Jewish existence in a Christian world, see also Antinomianism in the New Testament and Supersessionism.
Paul also argues unmarried people must please God, just like married people must please their spouses.
Sylvia Tamale argues that this was done not only in defiance of the council's cooperation with the colonial authorities, but also in protest against its interference with women's decisions about their own rituals.
" He also argues for a 14 year time span for its construction.
Joosten, however, while accepting that the carelessness of the English scribe is the most likely explanation for most such instances, nevertheless argues that a minority of such readings are due to translation errors in the Spanish text: as, for example, where the Italian text employs the conjunction pero, with an Italian meaning ' therefore '; while the Spanish text also reads pero, with a Spanish meaning ' however '; the Italian sense being the one demanded by the context.
Campbell also argues that the image of the Virgin Mary was derived from the image of Isis and her child Horus: " The antique model for the Madonna, is Isis with Horus at her breast ".
Mill also argues that simpler beings ( he often refers to pigs ) have an easier access to the simpler pleasures ; since they do not see other aspects of life, they can simply indulge in their lower pleasures.
Although Rousseau argues that sovereignty ( or the power to make the laws ) should be in the hands of the people, he also makes a sharp distinction between the sovereign and the government.
He asserts that he too had a sighting and also argues that the hoaxed photo is not a good reason to dismiss eyewitness reports and other evidence.
Ian Peddie argues that they were "... loud, powerful and often heavy, but their music was also humorous, self-reflective and extremely subtle ".

0.106 seconds.