Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Act of July 3, 1952 ( 66 Stat. 328 ) as amended ( 42 U.S.C. 1952-1958 ), is further amended to read as follows: Section 1.

Upon such sale, there shall be returned to any State or public agency which has contributed financial assistance under Section 3 of this joint resolution a proper share of the net proceeds of the sale.

The first step in processing was to analyze the returns from Questions 1, 2, and 3 to determine whether the respondents were large businesses or small businesses, in accordance with the definitions contained in ASPR Section 1-701.

Affidavit is treated as “ Evidence ” within the meaning of Section 3 of the Evidence Act.

He was the ruler of everything and the creator of heaven and earth ( Section 3 ).

Section 2 of the Non-Fatal Offences against the Person Act 1997 creates the offence of assault, and section 3 of that Act creates the offence of assault causing harm.

Section 3 ( 6 ) provided that a constable could arrest without warrant anyone he reasonably suspected to be committing affray.

This license is a 2-clause BSD license with an additional copyleft clause similar to the GNU GPL version 2's Section 3, requiring source code of an application using Berkeley DB to be made available for a nominal fee.

* " Special Section: Ranch Apocalypse " in Spectrum issue 23: 1 ( May 1993 ), and Responses in Spectrum 23: 3 ( October 1993 ), p56 – 59

Chap 227 Magistrates Ordinance Section 99 which states the magistrate can ' summarily sentence the offender to a fine at level 3 and to imprisonment for 6 months.

Sorting decimals properly is a bit more difficult, because different locales use different symbols for a decimal point, and sometimes the same character used as a decimal point is also used as a separator, for example " Section 3. 2. 5 ".

In The NCAA rulebook defines eligible receivers for college football in Rule 7, Section 3, Article 3.

* Section 3. H. i: The Four Noble Truths-Wings to Awakening ( translated by Thanissaro Bhikkhu )

* Phase Transitions in Combinatorial Optimization Problems, Section 3: Introduction to Graphs ( 2006 ) by Hartmann and Weigt

Users on the GnuCash mailing list have reported using it for Section 501 ( c ) 3 non-profit organizations successfully.

:: Example 3 ( semi-presidential republic ): Chapter 4, Article 86, Section 4 of the Constitution of Russia states:

:: Example 6 ( semi-presidential republic ): Under Chapter 4, Article 80, Section 3 of the Constitution of Russia:

:: Example 3 ( semi-presidential republic ): Chapter 4, Section 2 of the Constitution of the Republic of Korea states:

Some states have fixed term legislatures, with no option of bringing forward elections ( e. g. Article II, Section 3, of the U. S. Constitution ).

The two primary exemptions in the Investment Company Act of 1940 that hedge funds relied on were ( a ) Section 3 ( c ) 1 which restricts funds to 100 or fewer investors and ( b ) Section 3 ( c ) 7, which requires all investors to meet a " qualified purchaser " criterion.

Although under Section 3 ( c ) 7 a fund can have an unlimited number of investors, if a fund has any class of equity securities owned by more than 499 investors, it must register its securities with the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Section 6 of the Statute of Frauds Amendment Act 1828 ( commonly known as Lord Tenterden's Act ) was enacted to prevent section 4 of the 1677 Act being circumvented by bringing an action for the tort of deceit ( the tort in Freeman v. Palsey ).

In Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer,, the Supreme Court ruled that Congress may abrogate state immunity from suit under Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment.

In Central Virginia Community College v. Katz,, the Court ruled the Congress could do the same regarding bankruptcy cases by way of Article I, Section 8, Clause 4 of the Constitution.

For example, in Richardson v. Ramirez, the Court cited Section 2 as justification for the states disenfranchising felons.

In Perry v. United States ( 1935 ), the Supreme Court ruled that under Section 4 voiding a United States government bond " went beyond the congressional power.

Section 5, the last section, was construed broadly by the Supreme Court in Katzenbach v. Morgan ( 1966 ).

In Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad,, the Supreme Court ruled that ( 1 ) the Sixteenth Amendment removes the Pollock requirement that certain income taxes ( such as taxes on income " derived from real property " that were the subject of the Pollock decision ), be apportioned among the states according to population ; ( 2 ) the federal income tax statute does not violate the Fifth Amendment's prohibition against the government taking property without due process of law ; ( 3 ) the federal income tax statute does not violate the Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 requirement that excises, also known as indirect taxes, be imposed with geographical uniformity.

v. 1, Chapter III, Section 2, p. 177, " Origin and Progress of the Oracles "

Section 13A of the act was fully applied by the Supreme Court of the United States in New Negro Alliance v. Sanitary Grocery Co., in an opinion authored by Justice Owen Roberts.

In Bush v. Vera, the Supreme Court, in a plurality opinion, rejected Texas's contention that Section 5 required racially-gerrymandered districts.

Justice Brennan, author of the majority opinion in Craig v. Boren, provided a brief but notable dissent based solely on Section 2.

" Section 1 has thus been used to uphold laws against objectionable conduct such as hate speech ( e. g., in R. v. Keegstra ) and obscenity ( e. g., in R. v. Butler ).

In 1933, the North Carolina State Supreme Court heard Brewer v. Valk, an appeal from Forsyth County Superior Court, in which the Supreme Court upheld that the 1929 law violated both the U. S. Constitution's 14th Amendment and Article 1, Section 17 of the 1868 North Carolina State Constitution.

This limit on freedom of association results from Section 1981 of Title 42 of the United States Code, as balanced against the First Amendment in the 1976 decision of Runyon v. McCrary.

The preamble of Section 91 of the Constitution Act, 1867 states: " It shall be lawful for the Queen, [...] to make laws for the Peace, Order, and good Government of Canada, in relation to all Matters not coming within the Classes of Subjects by this Act assigned exclusively to the Legislatures of the Provinces ;" In addition to assigning powers that are not otherwise stated elsewhere ( which has been very narrowly interpreted ), this has led to the creation of the national emergency and national concern doctrines, which are governed by the principles stated by Le Dain J. in R. v. Crown Zellerbach Canada Ltd .:

This played to his strengths, and many of his decisions are considered farsighted ; the principle in Blaney v Hendricks, for example, that interest is due on an account where money was lent, which anticipated Section 3 of the Law Reform ( Miscellaneous Provisions ) Act 1934.

" The Second Circuit relied on the case of Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 U. S. 579 ( 1952 ), where the U. S. Supreme Court had ruled that President Truman, during the Korean War years, could not use his position and power as commander in chief, created under Article 2, Section 2, of the U. S. Constitution, to seize the nation's steel mills on the eve of a nationwide steelworkers strike.

One of its first major cases was Cole v Whitfield ( 1988 ), concerning the troublesome Section 92, which had been interpreted inconsistently and confusingly since the beginning of the court.

* October 31-In Sauvé v. Canada ( Chief Electoral Officer ), the Supreme Court rules that all prisoners have the right to vote under Section Three of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, regardless of the stipulation in the Canada Elections Act that prisoners serving sentences of two years or more may not vote

Section 230 ( e )( 2 ); see also Gucci America, Inc. v. Hall & Associates, 135 F. Supp.

22 June 2004 ) ( state right of publicity claim is not covered by Section 230 ); but see Carafano v. Metrosplash. com, Inc., 339 F. 3d 1119 ( 9th Cir.

Beginning in March 2009, GLAD has filed Federal Court challenges to Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act that prevents the federal government from providing certain federal rights and benefits and assigning certain responsibilities to individuals in same-sex marriages, including Gill v. Office of Personnel Management, Massachusetts v. United States Department of Health and Human Services, and Pedersen v. Office of Personnel Management.