So we are faced with a vast network of amorphous entities perpetuating themselves in whatever manner they can, without regard to the needs of society, controlling society and forcing upon it a regime representing only the corporation's needs for survival.

Again omitting recent developments, E.T. Leeds' dictum of 1913 has stood unchallenged: `` So far as archaeology is concerned, there is not the least warrant for the second ( shore occupied by ) of these theories ''.

So far as I am concerned, the child is unmistakably father to the man, despite the obvious fact that child and father differ greatly -- sometimes for the better and sometimes for the worse.

So much for all that.

So be it -- then we must embark on a crash program for 200-megaton bombs of the common or hydrogen variety, and neutron bombs, which do not exist but are said to be the coming thing.

`` So, we have to protect the old man for his own good.

`` So that's sculpture '', commented Argiento wryly, when he had sluiced down the floor for a week, `` making mud pies ''.

So when the Big House filled up and ran over, the sisters-in-law found beds for everyone in their own homes.

So, I say, Mr. Speaker, God bless you and keep you for many years not only for this body but for the United States of America and the free world.

So many times I have wondered why veterinarians do not wipe the table clean before each new canine patient is placed on it for examination.

So much for the prototype.

So our innate generosity of spirit prompts us to share our trials, errors and solutions with any who are taking the pool plunge for the first time -- in the pious hope that some may profit from our experience.

So much for the tiresome facts, as familiar to you, I'm sure, as to the constables and state troopers who followed in your wake.

So far as I can see, there is only one way out for the positivist.

So strenuous it was physically, with its days of horseback riding over rough roads that it seems an amazing feat of endurance for both Miss Packard and Miss Upton.

`` So you're looking for a woman who married a man who might have lived here a year ago and might have been poisoned.

So it wouldn't be for days or even a week before you could do anything.

So in the name of justice the magistrate cleared the court of all except officials to allow the captain to elaborate for almost an hour.

So they go looking for mergers with other firms that have publicly quoted stock, and almost daily they pound on the doors of firms like Frito.

So junior's bedroom was usually tricked out with heavy, nondescript pieces that supposedly could take the `` hard knocks '', while the fine secretary was relegated to the parlor where it was for show only.

The biblical symbol for this affirmation is expressed in the words: `` So God created man in his own image ; ;

`` So that the man should not have thoughts of grandeur, and become lifted up, as if he had no lord, because of the dominion that had been given to him, and the freedom, fall into sin against God his Creator, overstepping his bounds, and take up an attitude of self-conceited arrogance towards God, a law was given him by God, that he might know that he had for lord the lord of all.

So assume ƒ is differentiable at 0, as a function of two real variables from Ω to C. This is equivalent to the existence of two complex numbers and ( which are the partial derivatives of ƒ ) such that we have the linear approximation

So, the moment you add to any proposition or variable semantic content, the problem arises again, because the propositions and variables with semantic content run outside the system.

So the symbol is homogeneous in the variables y, of degree n. The symbol is well defined even though ∂/∂ x < sub > i </ sub > does not commute with x < sub > i </ sub > because we only keep the highest order terms and differential operators commute " up to lower-order terms ".

So to use a predicate as a variable is to have it occupy the place of a name which only individual variables should occupy.

So, in order for a differential dQ, that is a function of four variables to be an exact differential, there are six conditions to satisfy.

So, each particle adds three independent variables to the wavefunction, one for each coordinate needed to describe the position of that particle.

So these variable became what we know as Ashtekar variables, a particular flavor of Einstein-Cartan theory with a complex connection. General relativity theory expressed in this way, made possible to pursue quantization of it using well-known techniques from quantum gauge field theory.

So long as the underlying specification is correct, multicollinearity does not actually bias results, it just produces large standard errors in the related independent variables.

So the line is a horizontal tangent for the arctangent when x tends to −∞, and is a horizontal tangent for the arctangent when x tends to +∞.

So does not have an asymptote when x tends to +∞.

So the above product is always equal to the difference quotient, and to show that the derivative of at a exists and to determine its value, we need only show that the limit as x goes to a of the above product exists and determine its value.

So its limit as x goes to a exists and equals Q ( g ( a )), which is f ′( g ( a )).

So, is the relative price of a unit of x as to the number of units given up in y.

So we can identify the " class of all sets " with the predicate x = x or any equivalent predicate.

So any point P =( x, y ) on the parabola will be equidistant both to ( 0, f ) and ( x ,- f ).

So, the parabola can be written as ; and for a parabola such as f ( x )= x², the a coefficient is 1, so the focus F is ( 0, ¼ )

So, the prime number theorem can also be written as π ( x ) ~ Li ( x ).

So that the propagation velocity v is v = x / t = ω / k.

So too with " g " and " c ", and " p " and " b ", and also " s " and " z " ( and " x ").

So when the value x is assigned to y, the sentence can be rewritten to, which simplifies to, a contradiction.

So that in fine, I cannot write you in x sheets of paper the strange sight I saw there, organs and all destroyed.

So we decompose the numerator x + 6 as ( x − 4 ) + 10, and we write the integral as

So we calculate the greatest common divisor of the polynomials p ( x ) and p ′( x ); adjust the leading coefficient to be one and call it g ( x ).

So the multiple root of p ( x ) is r = 1.

So any multiple of g ( x, y )- 3 may be added to f ( x, y ) leaving f ( x, y ) unchanged in the region of interest ( above the circle where our original constraint is satisfied ).