Help


[permalink] [id link]
+
Page "The Rigveda: A Historical Analysis" ¶ 20
from Wikipedia
Edit
Promote Demote Fragment Fix

Some Related Sentences

Talageri and evidence
In this chapter, Talageri alleges " Professor Witzel inventing evidence, suppressing inconvenient data, following an inconsistent methodology, retrofitting data into pre-conceived notions, contradicting himself again and again, and using misleading language ".

Talageri and by
The Rigveda: A Historical Analysis is a book by Shrikant G. Talageri ( born 1958 ).
In the eighth chapter Talageri discusses the interpretations of the Rig Veda by scholars and philosophers like Ralph T. H.
Talageri asserts that " this strong condemnation of a book ", as he characterizes " unread and unseen by them, is both unacademic and unethical.
Talageri also uses the purportedly late Vedic Anukramani ( a list of poets, deities and meters ) in analyzing the text of the Rigveda that is, per current scholarly consensus, and challenged by Talageri, hundreds of years earlier.
After the publication of his book on the Rig Veda ( 2000 ), Talageri was proposed ( by Witzel ) ( email on 17 June 2000 ) to do advanced study or a Ph. D. at Harvard, " provided he is open-minded and flexible in his views, and does not show himself to be intransigent or predisposed to certain ideas ".

Talageri and Witzel
On the basis of Erdosy's and Witzel's mis-citation of Talageri's book's title and name, Talageri concludes that Witzel criticized the book without having read or seen it.

Talageri and have
Talageri speculates that some of the tribes that fought against king Sudas and his army on the banks of the Parusni River during the Dasarajna battle have migrated to western countries in later times,

Talageri and on
Talageri gives also his views on unsettled topics like the chronological order of the Mandalas.
Talageri wrote a critique of a number of scholars such as Griffith, Pargiter, Tilak and Aurobindo in his book on the Rig Veda.

Talageri and scholars
Talageri later considered his criticism of other scholars as unnecessary ( but then repeated it forcefully in his next book, 2008 ), and he wrote that other writers like N. S.

Talageri and .
* S. G. Talageri, The RigVeda-A Historical Analysis chapter 4
Talageri, in his book " The Rigveda: A Historical Analysis ", proposes Airyam Vaejah to be located in Kashmir.
Nirala, and Shrikant Talageri among others.
Nirala, and Shrikant Talageri among others.
* Talageri, Shrikant G. 2000.
Talageri argues that the Indo-Iranian Airyanem Vaejah lies in Kashmir.
According to Talageri, the Rigvedic Aryans lived in Haryana, from where they migrated to the Sarasvati River region, and then westward to Iran and Europe.
* The Rigveda-A Historical Analysis, ch. 9: Michael Witzel-An Examination of Western Vedic Scholarship Shrikant G. Talageri

considers and evidence
The scientific community considers that Duesberg's arguments are the result of cherry-picking predominantly outdated scientific data and selectively ignoring evidence in favour of HIV's role in AIDS.
Kurt Schwenk, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Connecticut, finds the discovery of these glands intriguing, but considers most of the evidence for venom in the study to be " meaningless, irrelevant, incorrect or falsely misleading ".
Anbessa Tefera and Peter Unseth consider the poorly attested Shabo language to be Nilo-Saharan, though unclassified within the family due to lack of data ; Dimmendaal considers it to be a language isolate on current evidence.
The Court considers that the evidence available to it is insufficient to demonstrate the total dependence of the contras on United States aid.
Whilst Richard Wiseman considers remote viewing to be proven by the current standards of scientific endeavour, he uses this to call for higher standard of evidence when studying the paranormal.
The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle ignores the existence of Svein, or his claim to the throne, which Howard considers as evidence of the relative entries being unreliable, of failing to give a complete picture.
Lakoff's reliance on empirical scientific evidence, i. e. specifically falsifiable predictions, in the 1987 work and in Philosophy in the Flesh ( 1999 ) suggests that the cognitive-metaphor position has no objections to the scientific method, but instead considers the scientific method a finely developed reasoning system used to discover phenomena which are subsequently understood in terms of new conceptual metaphors ( such as the metaphor of fluid motion for conducted electricity, which is described in terms of " current " " flowing " against " impedance ," or the gravitational metaphor for static-electric phenomena, or the " planetary orbit " model of the atomic nucleus and electrons, as used by Niels Bohr ).
In establishing the critical text, the textual critic considers both " external " evidence ( the age, provenance, and affiliation of each witness ) and " internal " or " physical " considerations ( what the author and scribes, or printers, were likely to have done ).
However, modern opinion considers the apparent similarities the result of convergent evolution, and based on a wealth of evidence splits the classically defined " Pelecaniformes " into several groups.
It also considers written evidence from the intelligence and security agencies and relevant government departments.
The scientific community considers the evidence that HIV causes AIDS to be conclusive and rejects AIDS-denialist claims as pseudoscience based on conspiracy theories, faulty reasoning, cherry picking, and misrepresentation of mainly outdated scientific data.
In reflective problem solving and thoughtful decision making using critical thinking, one considers evidence ( like investigating evidence ), the context of judgment, the relevant criteria for making the judgment well, the applicable methods or techniques for forming the judgment, and the applicable theoretical constructs for understanding the problem and the question at hand.
( However, Cornell considers the evidence tenuous ).
Stanton Friedman considers the general attitude of mainstream academics as arrogant and dismissive, or bound to a rigid world view that disallows any evidence contrary to previously held notions.
People present evidence to a Gender Recognition Panel, which considers their case and issues a Gender Recognition Certificate.
As Tenpenny is dying Carl considers shooting him, but Sweet stops him, saying that they shouldn't leave evidence that Tenpenny was killed instead of it just being an accident.
Referring to linguistic arguments as well as archaeological evidence, Schumacher even considers Lepontic a primary branch of Celtic, perhaps even the first language to diverge from Proto-Celtic.
Stiglitz finds no evidence to support this belief, and considers the ' Washington Consensus ' policy of free markets to be a blend of ideology and bad science.
Senior considers that these conquests can only refer to Menander: Against this, John Mitchener considers that the Greeks probably raided the Indian capital of Pataliputra during the time of Demetrius, though Mitchener's analysis is not based on numismatic evidence.
Note that classical hypothesis testing gives one hypothesis ( or model ) preferred status ( the ' null hypothesis '), and only considers evidence against it.
Malcolm Todd however considers there to be no evidence to support this.
Regarding the empirical evidence, based on large panels of countries or time series approaches, Fields ( 2001 ) considers the Kuznets hypothesis refuted.
The modern writer Marc Bloch considers seisin to signify " possession made venerable by the lapse of time " and that " paper documentary evidence was not required to establish seisin, rather human memory of the use of land or administration of justice there was invoked, especially these by the ancestors ".

0.961 seconds.