Then and become partially defined operations on G, and will in fact be defined everywhere ; so we define * to be and to be.

Then define

We wish to maximize total value subject to the constraint that total weight is less than or equal to W. Then for each w ≤ W, define m to be the maximum value that can be attained with total weight less than or equal to w. m then is the solution to the problem.

Then to define multiplication, it suffices by the distributive law to describe the product of any two such terms, which is given by the rule

For f a real polynomial in x, and for any a in such an algebra define f ( a ) to be the element of the algebra resulting from the obvious substitution of a into f. Then for any two such polynomials f and g, we have that ( fg ) ( a )

For f ∈ R, define D < sub > f </ sub > to be the set of ideals of R not containing f. Then each D < sub > f </ sub > is an open subset of Spec ( R ), and is a basis for the Zariski topology.

Then one might define the glass as being 0. 7 empty and 0. 3 full.

# Then, the juxtaposition of a writer's works leads the critic to define symbolical themes.

Then it may be buttered and eaten as a toast ( its most common use as a breakfast dish ), or it may be filled or topped with either doces ( sweet ) or salgados ( savory ) ingredients, which define the kind of meal the tapioca is used for: breakfast, afternoon tea or dessert.

Then, the angle θ around this axis in the X-Y plane can be used to define the trajectory as,

In particular, let p define the coordinates of points in a reference frame M coincident with a fixed frame F. Then, when the origin of M is displaced by the translation vector d relative to the origin of F and rotated by the angle φ relative to the x-axis of F, the new coordinates in F of points in M are given by

Then it is not possible to define, in ZFC, the set of all ( Gödel numbers of ) formulas that define real numbers.

Then define a process Y, such that each state of Y represents a time-interval of states of X.

Then is an intuitionistic Kripke frame, and we define a model in this frame by

For such a subgroup G, define Fix ( G ) to be the field consisting of all elements of L that are held fixed by all elements of G. Then the maps E Gal ( L / E ) and G Fix ( G ) form an antitone Galois connection.

Then we could define, which grows much faster than any for finite k ( here ω is the first infinite ordinal number, representing the limit of all finite numbers k ).

Let B be a complex Banach algebra containing a unit e. Then we define the spectrum σ ( x ) ( or more explicitly σ < sub > B </ sub >( x )) of an element x of B to be the set of those complex numbers λ for which λe − x is not invertible in B.

If we take E to be the sum of the even exterior powers of the cotangent bundle, and F to be the sum of the odd powers, define D = d + d *, considered as a map from E to F. Then the topological index of D is the Euler characteristic of the Hodge cohomology of M, and the analytical index is the Euler class of the manifold.

Then we recursively define the truth of a formula in a model:

For every r ≥ 0, let n ( r, f ) be the number of poles, counting multiplicity, of the meromorphic function f in the disc | z | ≤ r. Then define the Nevanlinna counting function by

) Suppose additionally that a < sub > n </ sub > is the number of elements of A with weight n. Then we define the formal Dirichlet generating series for A with respect to w as follows:

Then define

Then define the function F to be

Then we can solve for f ′.

Then f = u + iv is complex-differentiable at that point if and only if the partial derivatives of u and v satisfy the Cauchy – Riemann equations ( 1a ) and ( 1b ) at that point.

Let R be a domain and f a Euclidean function on R. Then:

Then the probability density function f *( x ) of the size biased population is

Then the image set f ( I ) is also an interval, and either it contains f ( b ), or it contains f ( a ); that is,

It is frequently stated in the following equivalent form: Suppose that is continuous and that u is a real number satisfying or Then for some c ∈ b, f ( c ) = u.

Then the pair (( A < sub > i </ sub >)< sub > i ∈ I </ sub >, ( f < sub > ij </ sub >)< sub > i ≤ j ∈ I </ sub >) is called an inverse system of groups and morphisms over I, and the morphisms f < sub > ij </ sub > are called the transition morphisms of the system.

* Let the index set I of an inverse system ( X < sub > i </ sub >, f < sub > ij </ sub >) have a greatest element m. Then the natural projection π < sub > m </ sub >: X → X < sub > m </ sub > is an isomorphism.

Let the line of symmetry intersect the parabola at point Q, and denote the focus as point F and its distance from point Q as f. Let the perpendicular to the line of symmetry, through the focus, intersect the parabola at a point T. Then ( 1 ) the distance from F to T is 2f, and ( 2 ) a tangent to the parabola at point T intersects the line of symmetry at a 45 ° angle.

Then ( X × Y, ( π < sub > 1 </ sub >, π < sub > 2 </ sub >)) is a terminal morphism from Δ to the object ( X, Y ) of D × D. This is just a restatement of the above since the pair ( f, g ) represents an ( arbitrary ) morphism from Δ ( Z ) to ( X, Y ).

Then because the construction of f was uniform, this is a recursive function of two variables.

Then the sufficient condition for exact reconstructability from samples at a uniform sampling rate f < sub > s </ sub > ( in samples per unit time ) is:

Then we can translate this system into fuzzy program in such a way that f is the interpretation of a vague predicate Good ( x, y ) in the least fuzzy Herbrand model of this program.

Then f is called an immersion if its derivative is everywhere injective.

Then the energy of the vacuum is exactly E < sub > 0 </ sub >.

Then, p < sup > 2 </ sup > is the fraction of the population homozygous for the first allele, 2pq is the fraction of heterozygotes, and q < sup > 2 </ sup > is the fraction homozygous for the alternative allele.

) Then X < sub > i </ sub > is the value ( or realization ) produced by a given run of the process at time i. Suppose that the process is further known to have defined values for mean μ < sub > i </ sub > and variance σ < sub > i </ sub >< sup > 2 </ sup > for all times i. Then the definition of the autocorrelation between times s and t is

Then X is reflexive if and only if each X < sub > j </ sub > is reflexive.

Then the cotangent space at x is defined as the dual space of T < sub > x </ sub > M:

Then I < sub > x </ sub > and I < sub > x </ sub >< sup > 2 </ sup > are real vector spaces and the cotangent space is defined as the quotient space T < sub > x </ sub >< sup >*</ sup > M = I < sub > x </ sub > / I < sub > x </ sub >< sup > 2 </ sup >.

Then the complex derivative of ƒ at a point z < sub > 0 </ sub > is defined by

Indeed, following, suppose ƒ is a complex function defined in an open set Ω ⊂ C. Then, writing for every z ∈ Ω, one can also regard Ω as an open subset of R < sup > 2 </ sup >, and ƒ as a function of two real variables x and y, which maps Ω ⊂ R < sup > 2 </ sup > to C. We consider the Cauchy – Riemann equations at z = 0 assuming ƒ ( z ) = 0, just for notational simplicity – the proof is identical in general case.

Then, for any given sequence of integers a < sub > 1 </ sub >, a < sub > 2 </ sub >, …, a < sub > k </ sub >, there exists an integer x solving the following system of simultaneous congruences.

Then the overall runtime is O ( n < sup > 2 </ sup >).

Then the Cartesian product set D < sub > 1 </ sub > D < sub > 2 </ sub > can be made into a directed set by defining ( n < sub > 1 </ sub >, n < sub > 2 </ sub >) ≤ ( m < sub > 1 </ sub >, m < sub > 2 </ sub >) if and only if n < sub > 1 </ sub > ≤ m < sub > 1 </ sub > and n < sub > 2 </ sub > ≤ m < sub > 2 </ sub >.