They would have to go west through the narrow river valley that separated Leyte from Samar and hope that it didn't close in before they returned.

They were married over the week-end, though he was easily sixty and she could not have been even thirty.

`` They wouldn't have sold me in the first place if there'd been food enough to go around ''.

They have pulled out all my teeth and now she will carve out my tongue with her hacksaw!!

They couldn't have much dough, but then none of the freight-bums Feathertop rolled had much.

They have also led the nation in the direction of a welfare state.

They believe that if the South had been let alone it would have produced a civilization superior to that of modern America.

They, too, have fragments of the go code with them.

As Wisman put it, `` They have separate pieces of the pie, and we have the whole pie.

They are huge areas which have been swept by winds for so many centuries that there is no soil left, but only deep bare ridges fifty or sixty yards apart with ravines between them thirty or forty feet deep and the only thing that moves is a scuttling layer of sand.

They are in general those fears that once seemed to have been amenable to prayer or ritual.

They are presumed to have plunged to a common grave in this fatal embrace.

They have indicated the direction but they have not been explicit enough, I believe, in pointing out Faulkner's independence, his questioning if not indeed challenging the Southern tradition.

They have an ancestry extending back, however, at least to 1728, when William Byrd described the Lubberlanders he encountered in the back country of Virginia and North Carolina.

They tell us, sir, that we are free, because we have in one hand a ballot, and in the other a stock certificate.

They all have this in common: the earth is situated near the center of the deferent.

They were in fact quietly laughing at him, for their King wished to have nothing to do with the Western world.

On December 21, the day that the Irish House of Commons petitioned for removal of Sir Constantine Phipps, their Tory Lord Chancellor, Molesworth reportedly made this remark on the defense of Phipps by Convocation: `` They that have turned the world upside down, are come hither also ''.

They have remained on the opened page of my mind in all the years which since have passed.

They, in effect, have compromised the opposing positions of the nineteenth century.

They, too, have links with the city's ills.

They opposed the Forand bill, which would have placed the major burden of financial support upon the individual himself through compulsory payroll deduction ; ;

They argued that a new type of political force was needed to challenge the Conservative Party.

They argued that misogyny is a better explanation than polygyny.

They have also argued that, while the modern Communist Party may be flawed, it is comparatively better than previous regimes, with respect to improving the general standard of living, than any other government that has governed China in the past century and can be seen in a more favourable light compared with most governments of the developing nations.

They argued that the Old Covenant required a priest to mediate between God and humanity, but that New Covenant explicitly abolishes the need for priestly role by making every Christian a priest with direct access to God's grace.

They argued that the Knights were perfectly justified in their crusade as it was a sacred duty of Christians to spread the true faith.

They argued that ancient precedent was not sufficient, because " the people were sovereign.

They have argued that his removal was necessary for future stability in the island nation.

They argued that existing neural models had failed to produce intelligent behaviour because they were too small, and that in order to create " artificial brains " it was necessary to manually assemble tens of thousands of evolved neural modules together, with the billion neuron " CAM-Brain " requiring around 10 million modules ; this idea was rejected by Igor Aleksander, who said " The point is that these puzzles are not puzzles because our neural models are not large enough.

They argued that China had controls in place and the sale might depress prices.

They argued that the Constitution was a " compact " or agreement among the states.

" They argued that " genuine freedom and individuality could only exist in a free society " and that in contrast to " misanthropic bourgeois individualism " anarchism was based in " a deep love of freedom, understood as a social product, a deep respect for human rights, a profound celebration of humankind and its potential and a commitment to a form of society where a ' true individuality ' was irrevocably linked to ' the highest communist socieability '"

They also argued that crucifixion was a standard form of execution in ancient times and not just one especially reserved for Jesus.

They argued that the negative employment effects of minimum wage laws are minimal if not non-existent.

They argued that the different policy views were not related to views on whether raising the minimum wage would reduce teen employment ( the median economist said there would be a reduction of 1 %), but on value differences such as income redistribution.

They argued that under such conditions, the reduced danger to the climate is obvious, and this held even if cities were targeted, for there was less likelihood of mass fires.

They argued that by signing to major labels and appearing on MTV, punk bands like Green Day were buying into a system that punk was created to challenge.

They opposed the supremacy of the monarch in the church ( Erastianism ), and argued that the only head of the Church in heaven or earth is Christ.

They argued even further that morality or immorality of any action could not be judged outside of the cultural context within which it occurred.

They argued that men dominated women not so much for material benefits as for the ego satisfaction intrinsic in domination.

They argued that women have always had the same obligations as men.

They argued that as scientists they had a duty to uncover the truth whether that was politically correct or not.

They argued that sociobiology does not necessarily lead to any particular political ideology, as many critics implied.

* They argue that the Dogmatic Constitution Pastor æternus concerns the permanence of the primacy of the Holy See over the universal church and condemns as heretical the propositions that the authority granted to St. Peter by Christ either was abolished after his death or devolved to the college of bishops, both positions that were argued by Orthodox theologians.

They argued that this was a response to attacks by counter-revolutionary forces.

They argued that popular support was expressed in the insurrection and that further appeals to popular support would be a waste of scarce resources.