Help


[permalink] [id link]
+
Page "Computing Machinery and Intelligence" ¶ 17
from Wikipedia
Edit
Promote Demote Fragment Fix

Some Related Sentences

Turing and offers
A Turing tarpit is any programming language or computer interface that allows for flexibility in function but is difficult to learn and use because it offers little or no support for common tasks.
When asked by the military to justify her complicity, Dr. Lamb offers a reformulation of the Turing test: " General, a machine becomes human ... when you can't tell the difference anymore.

Turing and selection
A Darwin machine ( a 1987 coinage by William H. Calvin, by analogy to a Turing machine ) is a machine that, like a Turing machine, involves an iteration process that yields a high-quality result, but, whereas a Turing machine uses logic, the Darwin machine uses rounds of variation, selection, and inheritance.

Turing and Be
John Backus presented FP in his 1977 Turing Award lecture " Can Programming Be Liberated From the von Neumann Style?
In his most well-known paper, ' What Might Cognition Be If Not Computation ,' van Gelder used the Watt Governor as a model to contrast with the Turing Machine.

Turing and kind
By a straightforward reduction to the halting problem it is possible to prove that ( for any Turing complete language ) finding all possible run-time errors in an arbitrary program ( or more generally any kind of violation of a specification on the final result of a program ) is undecidable: there is no mechanical method that can always answer truthfully whether a given program may or may not exhibit runtime errors.
This kind of reduction corresponds to Turing reduction.
Computing of this kind that goes beyond the Turing Limit is called hypercomputation.
Robby went on to develop networked examples of this kind of hierarchical " glue " at The Turing Hub.

Turing and have
Loops and conditional branching were possible, and so the language as conceived would have been Turing-complete as later defined by Alan Turing.
But other thinkers sympathetic to his basic argument have suggested that the necessary ( though perhaps still not sufficient ) extra conditions may include the ability to pass not just the verbal version of the Turing test, but the robotic version, which requires grounding the robot's words in the robot's sensorimotor capacity to categorize and interact with the things in the world that its words are about, Turing-indistinguishably from a real person.
Other formalisms ( besides recursion, the λ-calculus, and the Turing machine ) have been proposed for describing effective calculability / computability.
Because all these different attempts at formalizing the concept of " effective calculability / computability " have yielded equivalent results, it is now generally assumed that the Church – Turing thesis is correct.
Except for the limitations imposed by their finite memory stores, modern computers are said to be Turing-complete, which is to say, they have algorithm execution capability equivalent to a universal Turing machine.
At least nine Turing Award laureates and seven recipients of the Draper Prize in engineering have been or are currently associated with MIT.
More precisely, these proofs have to be verifiable in polynomial time by a deterministic Turing machine.
A non-deterministic Turing machine ( NTM ), by contrast, may have a set of rules that prescribes more than one action for a given situation.
For example, a non-deterministic Turing machine may have both " If you are in state 2 and you see an ' A ', change it to a ' B ' and move left " and " If you are in state 2 and you see an ' A ', change it to a ' C ' and move right " in its rule set.
Similarly, we have that NC is equivalent to the problems solvable on an alternating Turing machine restricted to at most two options at each step with space and alternations.
: To construct U is to write down the definition of a general-recursive function U ( n, x ) that correctly interprets the number n and computes the appropriate function of x. to construct U directly would involve essentially the same amount of effort, and essentially the same ideas, as we have invested in constructing the universal Turing machine.
Since 1952, more than 50 Stanford faculty, staff, and alumni have won the Nobel Prize, and Stanford has the largest number of Turing award winners ( dubbed the " Nobel Prize of Computer Science ") for a single institution.
The makers of Turing, Holt Software Associates, have since ceased operations.
It is unclear whether Turing is still in development, but there have been no new releases since November 25, 2007.
Turing is designed to have a very lightweight, readable, intuitive syntax.
His contributions have been acknowledged and lauded, repeatedly, with honorary degrees and awards that include the National Medal of Technology, the Turing Award, the Presidential Medal of Freedom, and membership in the National Academy of Engineering.
The attribution of thought or thought processes to non-human objects and phenomena ( especially computers ) could be considered anthropomorphism, though such categorizations have been contested by such computer scientists as Alan Turing ( see Computing Machinery and Intelligence ).
Fourteen Nobel Prize laureates, one Fields Medalist, and one Turing award winner have been affiliated with the university as faculty, researchers, or alumni.
Alan Turing in his 1950 paper Computing Machinery and Intelligence had predicted that by the turn of the millennium, we would have " computers with a storage capacity of about 10 < sup > 9 </ sup >", what today we would call " 128 megabytes.
Attempts have been made to use the concepts of Turing machine or computable function to fill this gap, leading to the claim that only questions regarding the behavior of finite algorithms are meaningful and should be investigated in mathematics.
Many of Church's doctoral students have led distinguished careers, including C. Anthony Anderson, Peter B. Andrews, George A. Barnard, William W. Boone, Martin Davis, Alfred L. Foster, Leon Henkin, John G. Kemeny, Stephen C. Kleene, Simon B. Kochen, Maurice L ' Abbé, Isaac Malitz, Gary R. Mar, Michael O. Rabin, Nicholas Rescher, Hartley Rogers, Jr., J. Barkley Rosser, Dana Scott, Raymond Smullyan, and Alan Turing.
Many have recognized that a major theme of The Diamond Age involves a distinction between Artificial Intelligence ( AI ) and human intelligence, with AI being depicted in the novel as having failed in its goal of creating software capable of passing the Turing Test.
Since a Befunge-93 program can only have a single stack and its storage array is bounded, the Befunge-93 language is, unlike most machine languages, not Turing-complete ( however, it has been shown that Befunge-93 is Turing Complete with unbounded stack word size ).
Naur is the only Dane to have won the Turing Award.
Thus we can construct a Turing machine that expects on its tape a string describing an action table followed by a string describing the input tape, and computes the tape that the encoded Turing machine would have computed.

Turing and sense
In any Turing complete language, it is possible to write any computer program, so in a very rigorous sense nearly all programming languages are equally capable.
Hypercomputers compute functions that a Turing machine cannot, hence, not computable in the Church-Turing sense.
Let T be a Turing machine which " represents " me in the sense that T can prove just the mathematical statements I prove.
Turing writes, " all digital computers are in a sense equivalent.
It is in this sense that the Turing degree of a set corresponds to its level of algorithmic unsolvability.
Nonetheless ANTIC has no capacity for writing back computed values to memory, it merely reads data from memory and processes it for output to the screen, therefore it does not qualify as a Turing machine in the mathematical sense of an abstracted computation device.
Turing completeness, as just defined above, corresponds only partially to Turing completeness in the sense of computational universality.
Note that while these reductions are stronger in the sense that they provide a finer distinction into equivalence classes, and have more restrictive requirements than Turing reductions, this is because the reductions themselves are less powerful ; there may be no way to build a many-one reduction from one set to another even when a Turing reduction for the same sets exists.

0.416 seconds.