[permalink] [id link]
An estimator is unbiased if its expected value is the true value of the parameter ; It is consistent if it converges to the true value as sample size gets larger, and it is efficient if the estimator has lower standard error than other unbiased estimators for a given sample size.
from
Wikipedia
Some Related Sentences
estimator and is
Eta-squared is a biased estimator of the variance explained by the model in the population ( it estimates only the effect size in the sample ).
In fact, the distribution of the sample mean will be equal to the distribution of the samples themselves ; i. e., the sample mean of a large sample is no better ( or worse ) an estimator of x < sub > 0 </ sub > than any single observation from the sample.
One simple method is to take the median value of the sample as an estimator of x < sub > 0 </ sub > and half the sample interquartile range as an estimator of γ.
However, because of the fat tails of the Cauchy distribution, the efficiency of the estimator decreases if more than 24 % of the sample is used.
Also, while the maximum likelihood estimator is asymptotically efficient, it is relatively inefficient for small samples.
The truncated sample mean using the middle 24 % order statistics is about 88 % as asymptotically efficient an estimator of x < sub > 0 </ sub > as the maximum likelihood estimate.
In statistics, an estimator is a rule for calculating an estimate of a given quantity based on observed data: thus the rule and its result ( the estimate ) are distinguished.
This is in contrast to an interval estimator, where the result would be a range of plausible values ( or vectors or functions ).
An " estimator " or " point estimate " is a statistic ( that is, a function of the data ) that is used to infer the value of an unknown parameter in a statistical model.
If the parameter is denoted θ then the estimator is typically written by adding a " hat " over the symbol:.
Being a function of the data, the estimator is itself a random variable ; a particular realization of this random variable is called the " estimate ".
In the context of decision theory, an estimator is a type of decision rule, and its performance may be evaluated through the use of loss functions.
When the word " estimator " is used without a qualifier, it usually refers to point estimation.
Then an " estimator " is a function that maps the sample space to a set of sample estimates.
An estimator of is usually denoted by the symbol.
It is often convenient to express the theory using the algebra of random variables: thus if X is used to denote a random variable corresponding to the observed data, the estimator ( itself treated as a random variable ) is symbolised as a function of that random variable,.
For a given sample, the " error " of the estimator is defined as
estimator and unbiased
The estimator is an unbiased estimator of if and only if.
Often, people refer to a " biased estimate " or an " unbiased estimate ," but they really are talking about an " estimate from a biased estimator ," or an " estimate from an unbiased estimator.
In fact, even if all estimates have astronomical absolute values for their errors, if the expected value of the error is zero, the estimator is unbiased.
The ideal situation, of course, is to have an unbiased estimator with low variance, and also try to limit the number of samples where the error is extreme ( that is, have few outliers ).
In particular, for an unbiased estimator, the variance equals the MSE.
Ordinary least squares ( OLS ) is often used for estimation since it provides the BLUE or " best linear unbiased estimator " ( where " best " means most efficient, unbiased estimator ) given the Gauss-Markov assumptions.
The Gauss-Markov theorem shows that the OLS estimator is the best ( minimum variance ), unbiased estimator assuming the model is linear, the expected value of the error term is zero, errors are homoskedastic and not autocorrelated, and there is no perfect multicollinearity.
The OLS estimator remains unbiased, however.
where is the unique symmetric unbiased estimator of the third cumulant and is the symmetric unbiased estimator of the second cumulant.
While the first one may be seen as the variance of the sample considered as a population, the second one is the unbiased estimator of the population variance, meaning that its expected value E is equal to the true variance of the sampled random variable ; the use of the term n − 1 is called Bessel's correction.
estimator and if
Often, if just a little bias is permitted, then an estimator can be found with lower MSE and / or fewer outlier sample estimates.
* In statistics, a statistic is called complete if it does not allow an unbiased estimator of zero.
Least squares corresponds to the maximum likelihood criterion if the experimental errors have a normal distribution and can also be derived as a method of moments estimator.
If the errors are correlated, the resulting estimator is BLUE if the weight matrix is equal to the inverse of the variance-covariance matrix of the observations.
Even among unbiased estimators, if the distribution is not Gaussian the best ( minimum mean square error ) estimator of the variance may not be
Formally, if T is a complete sufficient statistic for θ and E ( g ( T )) = τ ( θ ) then g ( T ) is the minimum-variance unbiased estimator ( MVUE ) of τ ( θ ).
The Rao – Blackwell theorem states that if g ( X ) is any kind of estimator of a parameter θ, then the conditional expectation of g ( X ) given T ( X ), where T is a sufficient statistic, is typically a better estimator of θ, and is never worse.
The improved estimator is unbiased if and only if the original estimator is unbiased, as may be seen at once by using the law of total expectation.
estimator and its
Real world situation does not allow for such time-series, in which case a statistical estimator needs to be used in its place.
In a linear model in which the errors have expectation zero conditional on the independent variables, are uncorrelated and have equal variances, the best linear unbiased estimator of any linear combination of the observations, is its least-squares estimator.
The MSE is the second moment ( about the origin ) of the error, and thus incorporates both the variance of the estimator and its bias.
The MSE thus assesses the quality of an estimator in terms of its variation and unbiasedness.
* The mean squared error of an estimator is the expected value of the square of its deviation from the unobservable quantity being estimated.
Despite the apparent limitations of this estimator, the result given by its Rao – Blackwellization is a very good estimator.
Using it to improve the already improved estimator does not obtain a further improvement, but merely returns as its output the same improved estimator.
An alternative method is to use the relationship between the range of a sample and its standard deviation derived by Leonard H. C. Tippett, an estimator which tends to be less influenced by the extreme observations which typify special-causes.
is an estimator of the common standard deviation of the two samples: it is defined in this way so that its square is an unbiased estimator of the common variance whether or not the population means are the same.
In its simplest form, the bound states that the variance of any unbiased estimator is at least as high as the inverse of the Fisher information.
The Cramér – Rao bound is stated in this section for several increasingly general cases, beginning with the case in which the parameter is a scalar and its estimator is unbiased.
or the minimum possible variance for an unbiased estimator divided by its actual variance.
Let be an estimator of any vector function of parameters,, and denote its expectation vector by.
Remember that an estimator for the price of a derivative is a random variable, and in the framework of a risk-management activity, uncertainty on the price of a portfolio of derivatives and / or on its risks can lead to suboptimal risk-management decisions.
* Finally, experiments or simulations can be run using the estimator to test its performance.
It would seem that the sample mean is a better estimator since its variance is lower for every N > 1.
0.119 seconds.