i. 18a ; compare Josephus, B. J. ii. 14, § 5 ; Jastrow, Dict.

§ 18 ( 5 ) of the Act specifies that agreements to comply with British Standards should be disregarded when deciding whether an agreement is a restriction upon trade.

This results in an increasing rate of fusion reactions, eventually igniting a thermonuclear flame ( carbon detonation ) which causes the supernova .< sup >, § 5. 1. 2 </ sup >

In May 2010, the Washington State Supreme Court provided an opinion after it was asked to certify a question referred by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington: “ Whether a public library, consistent with Article I, § 5 of the Washington Constitution, may filter Internet access for all patrons without disabling Web sites containing constitutionally-protected speech upon the request of an adult library patron .” The Washington State Supreme Court ruled that NCRL ’ s internet filtering policy did not violate Article I, Section 5 of the Washington State Constitution.

Under § 1332 ( d ) ( 2 ) the federal district courts have original jurisdiction over any civil action where the amount in controversy exceeds $ 5, 000, 000 and

§ 5, who, however, confounds the two occasions on which Hephaestus was thrown from Olympus.

The most recent revision of UCC § 2-201 increases the triggering point for the UCC Statute of Frauds to $ 5, 000, but as of 2006 no U. S. state has adopted revised Section 201.

§ 4, 5, i. 58.

Specifically in California, Code of Civil Procedure § 1279. 5 and Family Code § 2082 regulate common law and court decreed name changes.

Code of Civil Procedure § 1279. 5 ( a ) reads, " Except as provided in subdivision ( b ), ( c ), ( d ), or ( e ), nothing in this title shall be construed to abrogate the common law right of any person to change his or her name.

* Conversion of a separation judgment ( DRL § 170. 5 )

§ 5 ), and from that time forward, it was permanently annexed to the province of Syria.

5, § 9 ).

1, § 1 ; 10, § 4 ; 11, §§ 5 – 6 ).

The second paragraph of Chapter 5 contains several articles of disparate administrative content ; but they are not the same as the " other prescripts " of § 1 ; the redaction of the headings is generally seen as confusing and infelicitous on this point.

5, § 230-( trl.

understood, it is not known precisely how long it will take white dwarfs to cool to blackness .< sup >, § IIIE, IVA .</ sup > Barrow and Tipler estimate that it would take 10 < sup > 15 </ sup > years for a white dwarf to cool to 5 K ; however, if weakly interacting massive particles exist, it is possible that interactions with these particles will keep some white dwarfs much warmer than this for approximately 10 < sup > 25 </ sup > years .< sup >, § IIIE .</ sup > If protons are not stable, white dwarfs will also be kept warm by energy released from proton decay.

§ 78dd-1 ) and making false entries into its books and records ( 15 U. S. C § 78m ( b )( 2 ) & ( 5 )).

The Code of Federal Regulations ( 27 CFR Edition § 5. 37 Alcohol content ) requires that liquor labels must state the percentage of ABV.

Melampus, for example, quotes from her in his book Peri Palmon Mantike (" On Twitches ") § 17, § 18 ; and Pliny quotes from her respecting eagles and hawks, evidently from some book of augury, and perhaps from a work which is still extant in MS., entitled Orneosophium.

While the deuterocanonical Book of Baruch ( Baruch 1: 11, 12 ) and the writings of Josephus ( Antiquities 10. 11. 2-4 § 231-247 ) do mention Belshazzar, the references to Belshazzar in these works were ultimately dependent on the book of Daniel.

On a doxographic source used by Philo in book i., § 4 623, see Wendland in " Sitzungsbericht der Berliner Akademie.

The TV advertisings for their book were banned because they were considered as " advertising a worldview or religion ", which is forbidden by § 7 section 8 of the state treaty on broadcasting ( Rundfunkstaatsvertrag ) and European laws on media.

Three concurring justices also asserted that the Florida Supreme Court had violated Article II, § 1, cl.

Bertrand Russell discussed the paradox briefly in § 38 of The Principles of Mathematics ( 1903 ), distinguishing between implication ( associated with the form " if p, then q "), which he held to be a relation between unasserted propositions, and inference ( associated with the form " p, therefore q "), which he held to be a relation between asserted propositions ; having made this distinction, Russell could deny that the Tortoise's attempt to treat inferring Z from A and B is equivalent to, or dependent on, agreeing to the hypothetical " If A and B are true, then Z is true.

Three of the concurring justices also asserted that the Florida Supreme Court had violated Article II, § 1, cl.

Diebold claimed the memos as their copyrighted material, and asserted that anyone who published the memos online was in violation of the Online Copyright Infringement Liability Limitation Act provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act found in § 512 of the United States Copyright Act.

Wells asserted that by accepting the purchase order from Texas Instruments, Pfaff had placed the invention " on sale " one year and one week before applying for the patent, which would make it invalid under § 102 ( b ).

Arthur Schopenhauer wrote in § 18 of On the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason ( 1813 ): "... the representation of coexistence is impossible in Time alone ; it depends, for its completion, upon the representation of Space ; because, in mere Time, all things follow one another, and in mere Space all things are side by side ; it is accordingly only by the combination of Time and Space that the representation of coexistence arises.

1903 ), specifically Annex § 2, Ch. 1, Article 23, stating "... it is especially prohibited ... o employ poison or poisoned arms ".

In his § 8. 7 Five Approaches to Division by Zero he remarks that "... there is no uniformly satisfactory solution " ( p. 166 )

In 1844 ( 4 November ), the Norwegian Ministry of Justice declared: "... it is assumed that the so-called Portuguese Jews are, regardless of the Constitution ’ s § 2, entitled to dwell in this country, which is also, to knowledge, what has hitherto been assumed.

Subpart I — The Senior Officer Present § 700. 922 Shore Patrol: "... the senior officer present shall cause to be established, temporarily or permanently, in charge of an officer, a sufficient patrol of officers, petty officers, and noncommissioned officers to maintain order and suppress any unseemly conduct on the part of any person on liberty.

* Troelstra, A. S. ( no date but later than 1990 ), " A History of Constructivism in the 20th Century ", http :// staff. science. uva. nl /~ anne / hhhist. pdf, A detailed survey for specialists: § 1 Introduction, § 2 Finitism & § 2. 2 Actualism, § 3 Predicativism and Semi-Intuitionism, § 4 Brouwerian Intuitionism, § 5 Intuitionistic Logic and Arithmetic, § 6 Intuitionistic Analysis and Stronger Theories, § 7 Constructive Recursive Mathematics, § 8 Bishop's Constructivism, § 9 Concluding Remarks.

… Establishing a constitutional due process right under § 1983 to retest evidence with each forward step in forensic science would leave perfectly valid judgments in a perpetually unsettled state.

One of the central clause is § 35 VwVfG.

The definition in § 35 says, that an administration act is characterized by the following features:

§ 68 VwVGO rules the preliminary proceeding, called “ Vorverfahren ” or “ Widerspruchsverfahren ”, which is a stringent prerequisite for the administrative procedure, if an action for rescission or a writ of mandamus against an authority is aimed.

An empirical or an a posteriori concept is a general representation ( Vorstellung ) or non-specific thought of that which is common to several specific perceived objects ( Logic, I, 1., § 1, Note 1 )

The priority structure is defined primarily by § 507 of the Bankruptcy Code (.

The probable first appearance of the Greek adjective esôterikos is in Lucian of Samosata's " The Auction of Lives ", § 26, written around AD 166.

This is affirmed in § 2 ( 2 ) of the Land Transport Act 1999.

Moore's argument for the indefinability of “ good ” ( and thus for the fallaciousness of the “ naturalistic fallacy ”) is often called the Open Question Argument ; it is presented in § 13 of Principia Ethica.

Volksverhetzung is punishable in Germany even if committed abroad and even if committed by non-German citizens, if only the incitement of hatred takes effect within German territory, e. g. the seditious sentiment was expressed in German writ or speech and made accessible in Germany ( German criminal code's Principle of Ubiquity, Section 9 § 1 Alt.

Externalism about reasons ( or reasons externalism ) is the denial of reasons internalism ( Finlay & Schroeder, 2008, § 1. 1 ).

In Norway, § 44 of the penal code states specifically that " a person who at the time of the crime was insane or unconscious is not punished ".

" In § 166, I instanced the enormous horns of the extinct Irish elk, and contended that in this and in kindred cases, where for the efficient use of some one enlarged part many other parts have to be simultaneously enlarged, it is out of the question to suppose that they can have all spontaneously varied in the required proportions.

§ 82: As a result the Church, to whom the transmission and interpretation of Revelation is entrusted, does not derive her certainty about all revealed truths from the holy Scriptures alone.

It is, rather, " one of those innumerable objects of thought which are themselves incapable of definition, because they are the ultimate terms by reference to which whatever is capable of definition must be defined " ( Principia Ethica § 10 ¶ 1 ).

Moore coined the term " naturalistic fallacy " to describe arguments of this form ; he explains ( in § 12 ) that the fallacy involved is an instance of a more general type of fallacy, which he leaves unnamed, but which we might call the " definitional fallacy ".

The Code of Canon Law 332 § 2 states, " If it happens that the Roman Pontiff resigns his office, it is required for validity that the resignation is made freely and properly manifested but not that it is accepted by anyone.