[permalink] [id link]
Philoponus has raised the central question of the scientific and philosophical Aristotle ’ s work on chemistry.
from
Wikipedia
Some Related Sentences
Philoponus and has
Cosmas's view has never been influential even in religious circles ; a near-contemporary Christian, John Philoponus, disagreed with him as did most Christian philosophers of the era.
Philoponus and central
Philoponus and question
Philoponus and philosophical
The Christian philosopher, John Philoponus, presented the philosophical arguments against the ancient Greek notion of an infinite past and future.
John Philoponus (; ; 490 – 570 ) also known as John the Grammarian or John of Alexandria, was a Christian and Aristotelian commentator and the author of a considerable number of philosophical treatises and theological works.
Most of Philoponus ’ early philosophical works strive to define the distinction between matter, extension, place and various kinds of change.
Philoponus and Aristotle
The first Greek Christians to comment extensively on Aristotle were John Philoponus, Elias, and David in the sixth century, and Stephen of Alexandria in the early seventh century.
* John Philoponus: On Aristotle On Coming-to-be and Perishing 1. 1-5, translated by C. J. F. Williams.
* John Philoponus: On Aristotle On Coming-to-be and Perishing 1. 6-2. 4, translated by C. J. F. Williams.
* Philoponus: On Aristotle, Physics 5-8, with Simplicius: On Aristotle on the Void, translated by Paul Lettinck and J. O. Urmson ( 1994 ).
His critique of Aristotle in the Physics commentary was a major influence on Giovanni Pico della Mirandola and Galileo Galilei, who cited Philoponus substantially in his works.
Philoponus ’ early writings are based on lectures given by Ammonius, but gradually he established his own independent thinking in his commentaries and critiques of Aristotle ’ s On the Soul and Physics.
In the latter work Philoponus became one of the earliest thinkers to reject Aristotle ’ s dynamics and propose the ‘ theory of impetus ’: i. e. an object moves and continues to move because of an energy imparted in it by the mover, and ceases movement when that energy is exhausted.
In this erroneous but insightful theory can be found the first step towards the concept of inertia in modern physics, although Philoponus ’ theory was largely ignored at the time because he was too radical in his rejection of Aristotle.
* Commentary on Aristotle's Physics Philoponus ' most important commentary, in which he challenges Aristotle on time, space, void, matter and dynamics.
Both Aristotle and Philoponus argue that in kinds of change there are differences, in their form and matter.
Similarly to Aristotle, who rejected the immaterial things, and in contrast to Plato whose metaphysics accepted immaterial substances, Philoponus ’ concept of substance refers to the material objects.
There are various interpretations of the theory of mixture, but it seems that Philoponus is rather refining Aristotle ’ s approach than rejecting it.
Philoponus and ’
The intellectual battle against eternalism became one of Philoponus ’ major preoccupations and dominated several of his publications ( some now lost ) over the following decade.
Thus Philoponus ’ theological work is recognized in the history of science as the first attempt at a unified theory of dynamics.
In that regard, the repetitive nature of Philoponus ’ commentaries demonstrates his pedagogical awareness.
Concerning the discussion of space, Philoponus ’ claim that from every point in space is possible to draw identical figures, made him be perceived as an innovative thinker who influenced later Renaissance scholars, for instance, Gianfranceso Pico della Mirandola and Galileo Galilei.
Philoponus ’ contribution to the topic is in his new definition of potential, the third of the seven elements criteria.
John Philoponus ’ Christological “ opus magnum ” stands in the line with St. Cyril of Alexandria and Severus of Antioch.
Philoponus and work
Although averse to Christianity he abstains from assailing Christian doctrines, even when he combats expressly the work of his contemporary, John Philoponus, directed against the Aristotelian doctrine of the eternity of the universe.
Similarly to ideas presented in Physics, Philoponus in the work titled Arbiter states that our corrupted bodies ( material things ) will be eventually brought into being ( matter and form ) by God.
Philoponus and on
John Philoponus stands out for having attempted a fundamental critique of Aristotle's views on the eternity of the world, movement, and other elements of Aristotelian thought.
About 550 AD the Christian philosopher John Philoponus wrote a treatise on the astrolabe in Greek, which is the earliest extant Greek treatise on the instrument.
* Philoponus: Corollaries on Place and Void, with Simplicius: Against Philoponus On the Eternity of the World, translated by David Furley and Christian Wildberg ( 1991 ).
Perhaps most notable of these is his commentary on Genesis, which is cited by Cosmas Indicopleustes, John Philoponus, and Photius ( Cod.
John Philoponus wrote at least 40 works on a wide array of subjects including grammar, mathematics, physics, chemistry, and theology.
0.661 seconds.