They would have to go west through the narrow river valley that separated Leyte from Samar and hope that it didn't close in before they returned.

They thought it would be a chance for you to make a life out where nobody will be thought any better than the next except for just what's inside of them.

They believe that if the South had been let alone it would have produced a civilization superior to that of modern America.

They recognized that slavery was a moral issue and not merely an economic interest, and that to recognize it explicitly in their Constitution would be in explosive contradiction to the concept of sovereignty they had set forth in the Declaration of 1776 that `` all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among them are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

Defoe then commented, `` If they Could Draw that young Gentleman into Their Measures They would show themselves quickly, for they are not asham'd to Say They want only a head to Make a beginning ''.

They would all lie around on the rug during the meal, a very pretty sight as Rob Roy, Prudence, and Calamity Jane were all snow-white.

They would champion me.

They would be lolling under a tree sipping Ouzo, relishing the leisurely life, assuring him that the day was yet young.

`` They straggle at such a rate '', he told the commander-in-chief, `` that if the enemy were enterprising, they might get two from us, when we would take one of them, which makes me wish General Howe would go on, lest any incident happen to us ''.

They would go to New York together, where parties would be piled on weariness and on misery.

They opposed the Forand bill, which would have placed the major burden of financial support upon the individual himself through compulsory payroll deduction ; ;

They tried to outface him, but Joseph Simmons was as wide as two average men, and it would have taken braver men than these were to outface him.

They would feel what Mary was undergoing.

They all prayed now that the North would realize that peace must come, for Virginia had defended her land victoriously.

They caused my love for Jessica to become warmer and at the same time more hopeless, as if my adolescent self knew that only torment would ever bring me the courage to ask to see her again.

They could not guess that from their concepts of liberty and freedom would some day be born a new nation that for years would be the symbol of hope to the oppressed countries of the world.

They could be used to attack a nation's people ( which would inevitably mean the loss of the attacker's own people ), or they could be used with discrimination to destroy the enemy's military force.

They like it and would supply most of the capital because of the long term leases by strong oil companies.

They recall Byron's classic comment: `` I wish he would explain his explanation ''.

They argue further ( and somewhat contradictorily ) that our knowledge and resources in preventive medicine would make it possible to control such an outbreak of disease.

They become increasingly willing to accept the price increase that the industry claims the wage bargain would entail.

They argue that the oldest copies of this text family are likely to have been lost or destroyed over time with use, and therefore extant manuscripts cannot accurately date a text family.

They argue that his ascension to the station of bishop in Alexandria occurred under questionable circumstances.

They argue that Banquo is merely setting aside his sword for the night.

They argue that genes determine the architecture of a learning system, but that specific " facts " about how grammar works can only be learned as a result of experience.

They argue that the abuse of casuistry is the problem, not casuistry per se ( itself an example of casuistic reasoning ).

They also argue that satellite radio will boost Canadian culture by giving vital exposure to independent artists, instead of concentrating just on the country's stars, and point to the CRTC's successful extraction of promises to program 10 % Canadian content on satellite services already operational in the United States as important concessions.

They further argue that government encouragement of content filtering, or legal requirements for content-labeling software, would be equivalent to censorship.

They argue that there is a chance for the content-filtering software to be abused.

They argue that distinct selves can have perceptions that stand in relations of similarity and causality with one another.

They argue that although the price of oil went back down in the 1980s, there was no corresponding deflation.

They argue that some, if not all, of the cost difference between public and private schools comes from a process known as cream skimming — selecting only those students that belong to a preferred economic, religious, or ethnic group — rather than from differences in administration.

They argue that accurate, independent reasoning distinguishes the developed or educated mind and they thus stress the development of this faculty.

They argue that when most of the Oldowan tools were found in association with human fossils, Homo was always present, but Paranthropus was not.

They argue that nations and races must purge themselves of socially and biologically weak or degenerate people, while simultaneously promoting the creation of strong people, in order to survive in a world defined by perpetual national and racial conflict.

They argue, for example, that feminism often promotes misandry and the elevation of women's interests above men's, and criticize radical feminist positions as harmful to both men and women.

They argue that the measure " heritability " includes both a direct effect of the genotype on IQ and also indirect effects such that the genotype changes the environment, thereby affecting IQ.

They also argue that binding massive amounts of investments on nuclear energy would take funding away from more effective solutions.

They argue that the disciple who formed this community was both an historical person and a companion of Jesus Christ.

They further argue that UV light also is poorly reflected from soil and dull surfaces.

They argue that we own our bodies which are the laborers, this right of ownership extends to what we create.

They argue such an analogy fails because physical property is generally rivalrous while intellectual works are non-rivalrous ( that is, if one makes a copy of a work, the enjoyment of the copy does not prevent enjoyment of the original ).

They do argue, however, that to base a concept of intelligence on IQ test scores alone is to ignore many important aspects of mental ability.

They argue that the phenomenon of the global spread of English is better understood in the framework of appropriation ( e. g. Spichtinger 2000 ), that is, English used for local purposes around the world.

They argue that the American constitution owes as much or more to the English Liberal philosopher John Locke's emphasis on the rights of property and to Montesquieu's theories of the separation of powers.